بوم شناسی کشاورزی

بوم شناسی کشاورزی

ارزیابی مدل SSM_Wheat برای تخمین مراحل فنولوژی گندم (Triticum aestivum L.) تحت شرایط تاریخ کاشت و ارقام مختلف

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 گروه تولیدات گیاهی، دانشکده کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه گنبد کاووس، گنبد کاووس، ایران
2 بخش زراعی و باغی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان گلستان، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، گرگان، ایران
چکیده
گندم (Triticum aestivum L) یکی از مهم‌ترین غلات است که می‌توان با کمک مدل‌های رشد گیاهی، مراحل رشدی و عملکرد آن را در مناطق مختلف پیش‌بینی کرد. مدل SSM-Wheat یکی از مدل‌های اختصاصی توصیف رشد و عملکرد گندم است. لذا هدف از این تحقیق، ارزیابی مدل SSM-Wheat برای پیش‌بینی مراحل فنولوژیکی و عملکرد گندم است. اطلاعات لازم برای شبیه‌سازی مراحل فنولوژی و عملکرد گندم از داده‌های تجربی مربوط به هفت تاریخ کاشت (10 آبان، 20 آبان، 30 آبان، ، 10 آذر، 20 آذر، 30 آذر و 10 دی ماه ) و چهار ژنوتیپ گندم نان (لاین N9-93 و ارقام آراز، تکتاز و آرمان) طی دو سال زراعی 1400-1399 و 1401-1400 به دست آمد. ارزیابی مدل SSM-Wheat نشان داد که این مدل مراحل فنولوژیکی شامل روز تا سبز شدن، روز تا ساقه رفتن، روز تا خوشه‌دهی، روز تا گل‌دهی و روز تا رسیدگی فیزیولوژیکی، و همچنین عملکرد دانه را در تاریخ‌های کاشت مختلف و ارقام گندم تحت شرایط آب‌و‌هوایی مدیترانه‌ای خشک به‌طور دقیق شبیه‌سازی می‌کند. بااین‌حال، این مدل روز تا پنجه‌زنی، عملکرد بیولوژیکی و شاخص برداشت را به‌طور دقیق پیش‌بینی نکرد. بالاترین ضرایب تعیین (R²) برای روز تا خوشه‌دهی (79/0)، روز تا گل‌دهی (77/0) و روز تا رسیدگی فیزیولوژیکی (92/0) به دست آمد. در مجموع، با توجه به ارزیابی نسبتاً دقیق این مدل، می‌توان از آن در برنامه‌ریزی‌های مدیریت مزرعه، مانند انتخاب تاریخ کاشت، ارقام مناسب، تجزیه و تحلیل عملکرد محصول و ارزیابی محدودیت‌های آن استفاده کرد.
 
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Evaluation of the SSM_Wheat Model for Estimating the Phenological Stages of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under Different Planting Date and Cultivar Conditions

نویسندگان English

ali Rahemi karizki 1
Faramarz Sayyedi 2
Habibollah Soughi 2
Arazqlych Moarfy 1
Mojtaba Salehi Shaikhi 1
Saeed Bagherikia 2
1 Department of Plant Production, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Gonbad University, Gonbad, Iran
2 Agricultural and Horticultural Department, Golestan Province Agriculture and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Promotion Organization, Gorgan, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L) is one of the most important cereal crops. A model is a tool that helps us interpret and understand the world we live in. Crop modeling, a branch of agricultural science, has been around for about 40 years, with the development of powerful and efficient computers playing a major role in its advancement. These models usually enable the determination of management options and can be used to explore a wide range of management strategies at low costs. Plant models have proven to be useful tools for estimating crop yield, integrating a comprehensive set of values under physiological conditions, and evaluating crop management options. One essential feature of simulation models is the accurate prediction of crop phenology. The key phenological stages required for simulating the physiological processes of growth and yield in wheat are as follows: Days from planting to emergence, days from emergence to tillering, days from tillering to stem elongation, days from stem elongation to booting, days from booting to heading, days from heading to anthesis, days from anthesis to physiological maturity, and days from physiological maturity to harvest. The aim of this research is to evaluate the SSM-Wheat model for predicting the phenological stages and yield of wheat.
 
Materials and Methods
The necessary information for simulating the phenological stages and yield of wheat was obtained from experimental data on 7 planting dates (November 1st, November 10th, November 20th, November 30th, December 10th, December 20th, and December 30th) and four bread wheat genotypes (line N9-93 and the varieties Araz, Taktaz, and Arman) over two cropping years, 2019-2020 and 2020-2021. Data on the phenological stages and yield of wheat were used to evaluate the model. Daily meteorological data (maximum and minimum temperatures, precipitation, and solar radiation) were collected and defined in the model. Soil characteristics parameters were considered based on the model's default data.
 
Results and Discussion
The evaluation of the SSM-Wheat model showed that this model accurately simulates the phenological stages, including days to emergence, days to stem elongation, days to heading, days to flowering, and days to physiological maturity, as well as grain yield across different planting dates and wheat varieties under the climatic conditions of Gonbad. However, the model did not accurately predict days to tillering, biological yield, and harvest index. The highest coefficients of determination (R²) were obtained for days to heading (0.79), days to flowering (0.77), and days to physiological maturity (0.92). Accurate prediction of crop phenology is a crucial feature of simulation models. Yield in crop simulation models is largely regulated by the timing of developmental stages. The poor prediction of biological yield and harvest index may be due to water stress and high temperatures during the grain-filling and maturity stages, which caused leaf drop and reduced biomass, leading to incomplete harvest by the combine. Delayed planting and low temperatures during the early growth stages in areas with very cold winters, due to inadequate plant establishment and growth to withstand autumn frosts, and high temperatures in hot and dry regions during the late growth stages, especially the grain-filling period, can reduce plant yield. Grain weight is a key component of final grain yield and is influenced by environmental stresses, particularly water stress.
 
Conclusion
The evaluation of the SSM-Wheat model showed that this model was acceptable in simulating phenological stages, including days to emergence, days to stem elongation, days to heading, days to flowering, days to physiological maturity, and grain yield across different planting dates and cultivars under the climatic conditions of Gonbad Kavous. However, the model poorly predicted days to tillering, biological yield, and harvest index. It seems necessary to revalidate and refine the model accuracy using data from diverse experiments, and if the results of this review are confirmed, to incorporate them into the model equations. Nevertheless, this model can be used in field management planning, such as selecting planting dates, suitable cultivars, analyzing crop yield, and its limitations. Obviously, models become effective only when applied with an analysis of physiological and ecological conditions, based on experimental measurements and observations from the system.
 







© Authors retain the copyright. This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)




 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Coefficient of determination
Grain yield
Harvest index
Physiological examination
Simulation

© Authors retain the copyright. This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)

  • Ahmadi Alipour, H., Soltani, A., Kazemi, H., & Nehbandani, A. )2017(. Zoning Golestan province in terms of the ability and the wheat production gap using a simulation model (SSM). Journal of Crops Improvement, 20(1), 129-144. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22059/jci.2018.237053.1784
  • Bahramjerdi, F. )2015(. Evaluation of SSM-Wheat simulation model under Kerman conditions/ M.Sc. Thesis, Rafsanjan Vali Asr University, Rafsanjan, Iran. 1-100. (In Persian).
  • Berghuijs, H.N., Silva, J.V., Rijk, H.C.A., van Ittersum, M.K., van Evert, F.K., & Reidsma, P. )2023(. Catching-up with genetic progress: Simulation of potential production for modern wheat cultivars in the Netherlands. Field Crops Research, 296(15), 108891.‏ https://doi.org/1016/j.fcr.2023.108891
  • Delghandi, M., & Boroomand Nasab, S., )2014(. Evaluation of DSSAT 4.5-CSM-CERES-Wheat to simulate growth and development, yield and phenology stages of wheat under water deficit condition (case study: Ahvaz region). Water and Soil, 28(1), 82-91.‏ https://doi.org/10.22067/jsw.v0i0.20658
  • Hammer, G.L., Sinclair, T.R., Boote, K.J., Wright, G.C., Meinke, H., & Bell, M.J. )1995(. A peanut simulation model: I. model development and testing. Agronomy Journal, 87(6), 1085–1093. https://doi.org/ 2134/agronj1995.00021962008700060009x
  • Hu, P., Chapman, S.C., Sukumaran, S., Reynolds, M., & Zheng, B. )2022(. Phonological optimization of late reproductive phase for raising wheat yield potential in irrigated mega-environments. Journal of Experimental Botany, 73(12), 4236-4249.‏ https://doi.org/1093/jxb/erac144
  • Iran’s Agricultural Ministry. )2022 (Iran’s Agricultural Ministry. 2022. Annual statistics of agricultural production. available at: maj.ir.
  • Kassie, B.T., Asseng, S., Porter, C.H., & Royce, F.S. (2016). Performance of DSSAT-Nwheat across a wide range of current and future growing conditions. European Journal of Agronomy, 81, 27-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2016.08.012
  • Kheiri, M., & Kambouzia, J. (2022). Evaluation of the efficiency of APSIM -Wheat model for simulation of phenology and grain yield of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) in drylands of west and northwest of Iran. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 2(24), 118-135. (In Persian).
  • Moeinirad, A., Zeinali, E., Soltani, A., Galeshi, S., & Yeganeh Poor, F. (2017). Investigation of SSM-Wheat model to forecast of growth and yield of wheat in response to fertilizer nitrogen in order to decrease pollution environmental and diseases. International Journal of Advanced Biological and Biomedical Research, 5(2), 459-464.
  • Nehbandani, A.R., Soltani, A., Zeinali, E., Raeisi, S., & Rajabi, R. (2016). Parameterization and evaluation of SSM-soybean model for prediction of growth and yield of soybean in Gorgan. Journal of Plant Production, 22(3), 1-26. (In Persian).
  • Rahemi Karizaki, A., & Hosseini, S.H. (2020). Modeling of phenological stages and yield parameters of faba bean in the east of Golstan province conditions. Iranin Journal of Pulses Research, 11(1), 8-48. (In Persian). https://doi.org/ 22067/ijpr.v11i1.69427
  • Rahemi Karizaki, A., & Nouralizadeh Otaghsara, M. (2020). Simulation of soybean growth and yield using iLegume_Soybean model in Mazandaran .Journal of Plant Ecophysiology, 12(40), 166-177. (In Persian).
  • Rahemi Karizaki, A., Kouhkan, H., Feyzbakhsh, M.T., & Khaliliaqdam, N. (2023). Simulation of phonological development and growth duration in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor ) using SSM-iSorghum model (case Study: Gorgan county). Journal of Agroecology, 14(4), 713-729. (. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/AGRY.2021.67229.0
  • Rahemi Karizaki, A., Sanaie, K., Nakhzari Moghaddam, A., Golamalipour Alamdari, E., Pirdehghan, S., & Habibian, L. (2022). The effect of climate change pheological traits of chick pea (Cicer arietinum) under rainfeild and irrigated conditions in Gonbad. crop production, Journal of Crop Production, 15(1), 57-72. . (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22069/EJCP.2022.19074.2423
  • Rahemi-Karizaki, A., Khaliliaghdam, N., & Biabani, A. (2021). Predicting time trend of dry matter accumulation and leaf area index of winter cereals under nitrogen limitation by non-linear models. Plant Physiology Reports, 26, 443-456.‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/s40502-021-00597-x
  • Rani, N., Bamel, J.S., Garg, S., Shukla, A., Pathak, S.K., Singh, R.N., & Bamel, K. (2024). Linear mathematical models for yield estimation of baby corn (Zea mays). Plant Science Today, 11(1), 166-175. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.2618
  • Raza, A., Razzaq, A., Mehmood, S.S., Zou, X., Zhang, X., & Xu, J. (2019). Impact of climate change on crops adaptation and strategies to tackle its outcome. A review. Plants, 8(34), 1-29. https://doi.org10.3390/plants8020034
  • Rinaldi, M., Losavio, N., & Flagella, Z. (2003). Evaluation and application of the OILCROP–SUN model for sunflower in southern Italy. Agricultural Systems78(1), 17-30.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X (03)00030-1
  • Shiukhy-Sughanlu, , Mousavi-Baygi, M., Torabi, B., & Raeini-Sarjaz, M. (2023). Evaluating the SSM model efficiecy in simulating the wheat growth under water stress conditions. Journal of Water and Soil, 3(37), 353-366. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/jsw.2023.80355.1237
  • Soltani, A., Maddah, V., & Sinclair, T.R., (2013). SSM-wheat: A simulation model for wheat development, growth and yield. International Journal of Plant Production, 7(4), 711–740. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22069/IJPP.2013.1266
  • Spanic, V., Lalic, Z., Berakovic, I., Jukic, G., & Varnica, I. (2024). Morphological characterization of 1322 Winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) varieties from EU referent collection. Agriculture, 14(4), pp.551. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14040551
  • Wahbi, A., & Sinclair, T.R. (2005). Simulation analysis of relative yield advantage of barley and wheat in an eastern Mediterranean climate. Field Crop Resources, 91(2-3), 287–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2004.07.020
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله
نام را وارد کنید.
نشانی پست الکترونیکی را به درستی وارد کنید.
وابستگی سازمانی را به درستی وارد کنید.
توضیحات را وارد کنید (حداقل 50 حرف)
CAPTCHA Image
شناسه امنیتی را به درستی وارد کنید.

  • تاریخ دریافت 16 مرداد 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 14 آبان 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 02 آذر 1404
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار 01 دی 1404