ارزیابی عملکرد برگ خشک و بذر و کارایی مصرف آب برگ و بذر چهار اکوتیپ‌ وسمه (Indigofera tinctoria L.) در شرایط تنش کم‌آبی

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی


1 گروه زراعت و اصلاح نباتات، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان، ایران

2 دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان


در مناطق خشک و نیمه‌خشک یکی از راه­های ممکن، جهت دست­­یابی به پایداری تولیدات گیاهی، استفاده بهتر از آب به‌واسطه کاشت گیاهان متحمل به کم­آبی با نیاز آبی کمتر می­باشد. وسمه (Indigofera tinctoria L.) گیاهی فراموش شده و دارویی- صنعتی از خانواده بقولات است که در صنعت برای رنگ‌زایی و در طب سنتی برای درمان تنگی نفس و اسپاسم روده‌ای و نیز برای تقویت رشد مو و ... استفاده می­شود. این آزمایش با هدف بررسی تأثیر تنش کم‌آبی بر عملکرد برگ خشک و بذر و کارایی مصرف آب چهار اکوتیپ وسمه در طی سال­های زراعی 94-1393 و 95-1394، به‌صورت کرت­های خرد شده در قالب طرح بلوک­های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار در شهرستان جیرفت استان کرمان اجرا شد. عوامل کرت اصلی و فرعی به‌ترتیب شامل تنش کم‌آبی (100، 75 و 50 درصد نیاز آبی) و اکوتیپ (جیرفت، رودبار، قلعه گنج و ریگان) بودند. میزان 100 درصد نیاز آبی وسمه 6800 مترمکعب می­باشد. صفات مورد مطالعه شامل عملکرد برگ خشک وسمه، عملکرد بذر و کارایی مصرف آب بر پایه عملکرد برگ و بذر بود. نتایج نشان داد که تنش 75 (تنش ملایم) و 50 درصد نیاز آبی (تنش شدید) عملکرد برگ خشک را به‌ترتیب 8 و 24 درصد و عملکرد بذر را 16و 59 درصد، نسبت به شاهد، کاهش داد. همچنین تنش ملایم و شدید به‌ترتیب موجب افزایش 22 و 53 درصدی کارایی مصرف آب برگ گردید. کارایی مصرف آب بذر در شرایط تنش ملایم، به‌میزان 10 درصد افزایش یافت. در حالی‌که اعمال تنش شدید، کاهش20 درصدی این پارامتر را به همراه داشت. در شرایط تنش شدید، بیشترین عمکلرد برگ خشک و بذر و نیز کارایی مصرف آب برگ، به‌ترتیب به‌طور میانگین به‌میزان 9/5100 کیلوگرم در هکتار، 75/331 کیلو گرم در هکتار و 24/1 کیلو گرم در مترمکعب مربوط به اکوتیپ­های جیرفت و رودبار بود. بر اساس نتایج حاصل از این پژوهش و نیز با توجه به شرایط اقلیمی گرم و خشک جنوب کرمان و از طرفی، ضرورت تغییر الگوی کشت با محوریت صرفه‌جویی در مصرف آب و برتری ارزش اقتصادی، پیشنهاد می شود اکوتیپ­های جیرفت و رودبار جنوب وسمه را به‌عنوان گیاهی با نیاز آبی پایین در فصل تابستان و بعد از برداشت گندم و محصولات جالیزی کشت نمایند.


عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluating the Yield of Dry Leaf and Seed and Leaf and Seed Water Use Efficiency of four Indigo (Indigofera tinctorial L.) Ecotypes under Water Deficit conditions

نویسندگان [English]

  • Faramarz Rastegari 1
  • Enayat Allah Tohidi-Nejad 1
  • Ghasem Mohammadi- nejad 2
1 Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Iran
چکیده [English]

In arid and semi-arid regions, efficient use of water through improved cultivars with less water requirement and more drought tolerance is a basic important way to achieve assurance and stability of crop production. Water use efficiency (WUE) indicates the amount of consumed water for yield production and is defined as the ratio of dry matter or economic yield weight (g) to used water weight (m3). Indigo varieties are grown in many countries as ornamental plants for indigo color production and also as medicinal vegetative plants. Indigo (Indigofera tinctoria L.) is a valuable species of legumes that it's cultivation have an old background in Jiroft, Kahnooj, Bam and Iranshahr. It is known as a drought tolerant plant but in seedling stage, it is sensitive to water stress and requires sufficient water for seed production in flowering time. The aim of this experiment is evaluation of leaf and grain yield and WUE in existent and prevalent indigo ecotypes in Kerman south region in order to select the best ecotype for planting in this region in future.
Material and Methods
This experiment was conducted during two years in Jiroft, Kerman, as split plot based on a randomized complete block design with three replications. Different irrigation levels (50, 75 and 100% of water requirements) and four ecotypes (Jiroft, Kahnooj, Rigan and Ghaleh-Gange) were considered as the main and sub plots, respectively. The leaf dry weight, seed yield, water use efficiency base on leaf and seed were measured.
Results and Discussion
The results of ANOVA indicated that drought stress has significant effect on all of the measured traits. In addition the effect of drought × year was considerable on seed yield and seed WUE, while it was not on leaf yield and leaf WUE. The most seed yield obtained in normal condition in second year and the most seed WUE was reported in same year in average drought stress. For all of traits, the highest means obtained from normal conditions except for leaf WUE, which was obtained from severe stress conditions. Ecotype effect was remarkable for all of traits. Ecotype×year and ecotype×drought effects were significant for leaf WUE. Ecotype×drought was significant about seed yield too. For ecotype×year effect, highest leaf WUE was related to Jiroft ecotype in second year and for ecotype×drought effect the highest means of leaf WUE and seed yield were related to Jiroft in severe drought stress conditions and normal conditions, respectively. However, the results of this research showed that Jiroft and Roudbar ecotypes had higher leaf dry weight (5100.9 kg.ha-1), seed yield (331.75 kg.ha-1) and water use efficiency of leaf (1.24 kg.m-3) compared to other ecotypes under severe water stress conditions.
The results of this experiment indicated that drought stress notably influences leaf and seed yield in indigo. With consideration of drought × ecotype effect, in severe drought conditions Jiroft and south Roodbar ecotypes had no significant difference and these two ecotypes had the highest means for all of traits. Management of production conditions in order to leaf yield improvement is necessary since the aim of indigo cultivation is leaf production and color industry. In this way, as warm and drought climate conditions in sought of Kerman and necessity of cultivation pattern change in order to water economize and increase economic value, cultivation of these two ecotypes is recommended in alternation after wheat and vine crops.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Drought stress
  • Water use efficiency base on leaf and seed
Aghayee, A.H., and Ehsanzadeh, M., 2012. Effect of irrigation and nitrogen on yield and some physiological parameters of pumpkin paper. Journal Horticultural Science 42(3): 291-299.
Alizadeh, A., 2004. Soil water-plant relationship publishing center of Mashhad, Imam Reza University, 6th Ed., ISBN: 964-6582-57-5, p. 302. (In Persian with English Summary)
Allen, R.R., and Musik, J.T., 1993. Planting date, water management and maturity length relations for irrigated grain sorghum. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 36: 1123-1129.
Bangar, V.A., and saralaya, M.G., 2011. Anti-hyperglycaemic activity of ethanol extract and chlroform extract of Indigofera tinctoria leaves in streptozotocin induced diabetic mice (Family- Papilionaceae). Research Journal of Pharmaceutical Biological and Chemical Science 2(1): 445-455.
Barnabas, B., Jager, K., and Feher, A., 2007. The effect of drought and heat stress on reproductive processes in cereals. Plant, Cell and Environment 31(1): 11-38.
Cardon, D., 2007. Natural Dyes: Sources, Tradition, Technology and Science, Archetype Publications, London.
Cheruth, A.J., Gopi, R., Sankar, B., Gomathinayagam, M., and Panneerselvam, R., 2008. Differential responses in water use efficiency in two varieties of Catharanthus roseus under drought stress. Comptes rendus Biologies 331(1): 42-47.
Claeys, H., and Inzé, D., 2013. The agony of choice: how plants balance growth and survival under water-limiting conditions. Plant Physiology 162: 1768-1779.
Earl, H., and Davis, R.F., 2003. Effect of drought stress on leaf and whole canopy radiation use efficiency and yield of maize. Agronomy Journal 95: 688-696.
ElGhazali, G.E., Abdalla, W.E., Khalid, H.E., Khalafal, M.M., and Hamad, A.A., 2003. Medicinal plants of the Sudan .Medicinal plants of the Ingassana area. Part V. Ministry of Science and Technology, National Centre for Research, Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Institute, Khartoum.
 Emam, Y., and Zavaerh, M., 2006. Drought Tolerance in Higher Plants. Publishing Center of Tehran University, p. 186. (In Persian)
Feeser, A., Goggin, M.D., and Tobin, B.F., 2012. The Materiality of Color- The production, circulation and application of dyes and pigments. MPG Books Group, UK.
Goldani, M., and Rezvani Moghaddam, P., 2006. Effect of planting date and drought levels on yield and yield components of rain fed and irrigated pea in Mashhad. Journal of Agricultural Research 2(2): 229-239. (In Persian with English Summary)
Kafi, M., Borzooei, A., Salehi, A., Kamandi, A., Massomi, A., and Nabati, C.J., 2010. The Physiology of Environmental Stress in Plants. Published by University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran. p. 502. (In Persian)
Kage, H., Kochler, M., and Stutzel, H., 2004. Root growth and dry matter partitioning of cauliflower under drought stress conditions: measurement and simulation. European Journal of Agronomy 20: 379-394.
Khorramdel, S., Rezvani Moghaddam, P., Houshmand, M., and Moallem-Benhangi, F., 2016. Effect of different levels of manure and plant density on yield and yield components of grain and leaf of indigo. Plant Products Research Journal 23: 117-143.
Kobraei, S., Etminan, A., Mohammadi, R., and Kobraee, S.O., 2011. Effects of drought stress on yield and yield components of soybean. Annals of Biological Research 2(5): 504-509.
Kremer, D., 2002. Phenology of summer flowering of some woody plants in the botanical garden of the faculty of natural sciences and mathematics. Sumarski-List 126: 489-499.
Luiz-Ferreira, A., Cola, M., Barbastefano, V., Farias-Silva, E., Calvo, T.R., Almeida, A.B.A.D., Pellizzon, C.H., Hiruma-Lima, C.A., Vilegas, W., and Souza-Brito, A.R.M., 2011. Indigofera suffruticosa Mill. as new source of healing agent: involvement of prostaglandin and mucus and heat shock proteins. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 137: 192–198.
 Maleki, A., Naderi, R., Naseri, A., Fathi, A., Bahamin, S., and Maleki, R., 2013. Physiological performance of soybean cultivars under drought stress. Bulletin of Environment Pharmacology and Life Science 2(6): 38-44.
Mohammed, N., 2006. Potentialities of indigo plant (Indigofera tinctoria) production in the Sudan for domestic use, and exportation. Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Khartoum.
Muthulingam, M., Mohandoss, P., Indra, N., and Sethupathy, S., 2010. Anti-hepatotoxic efficacy Indigofera tinctoria (Linn.) on paracetamol induced liver damage in rats. International Journal of Pharmacy and Biological Research (1): 13-18.
Omidbaigi, R., 2008. Production and Processing of Medicinal Plants. Astan Ghods Press, Mashhad, Iran.Vol. 3, 5th Ed. P. 348. (In Persian)
 Pessarkli, M., 1999. Handbook of Plant and Crop Stress. Marcel Dekker. New York Inc. p. 697.
Puri, A., Khaliq, T., and Rajendran, S.M., 2007. Antidyslipidemic activity of Indigofera tinctoria. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Herbal 7: 57–64.
Reddy, A.R., Chaitanya, K.V., and Vivekananda, M., 2004. Drought-induced responses of photosynthesis and antioxidant metabolism in higher plant. Journal of Plant Physiology 161: 1189-1202.
Rezapour, A., Heidari, K., Golvi, K., and Ramroudi, K., 2012. Effects of drought stress and different amounts of sulfur fertilizer on yield and yield components of black cumin grains and adjustment of osmotic regulators. Iranian Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Researches 27(3): 396-384. (In Persian with English Summary)
 Safarnejad, A., 2004. Characterization of somaclones of Medicago sativa L. for drought tolerance. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 6: 121-127.
Sarhadi, H., Afsharmanesh, G.R., and Mokhtari, Z., 2014. Effect of drought Stress on some morphological traits and seed yield of indigo (Indigofera Tinctoria L.) under different levels of nitrogen. International Journal of Science 3: 2319-5037.
Taati, F., Talebi, H., Ebadi, M.T., Khoshnood Yazdi, A., and Dadkhah, A., 2014. Effect of drought and salt stress conditions on germination factors of indigo (Indigofera tinctoria). Environmental Stresses in Crop Science 7: 119-112.  
Wakarim, A., Aganchich, H., Tahi, H., Serraj, R., and Wahabi, S., 2005. Comparative effects of PRD and regulated deficit irrigation on water relation and water use efficiency in common bean. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 106: 275-782.