تأثیر منابع مختلف کود نیتروژن و بقایای گیاهی بر عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد جو (Hordeum vulgare L.) در شرایط تنش آبی انتهای فصل

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

دانشگاه شیراز

چکیده

به­منظور ارزیابی تأثیر منابع مختلف نیتروژن و بقایای گیاهی بر عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد جو  (Hordeum vulgare L.)در شرایط تنش آبی آخر فصل، آزمایشی به‌صورت اسپلیت فاکتوریل در قالب طرح بلوک­های کامل تصادفی در سه تکرار در مزرعه پژوهشی دانشکده کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی داراب – دانشگاه شیراز در سال زراعی 97- 1396 انجام شد. تیمارها شامل دو سطح آبیاری [1- مطلوب: آبیاری بر اساس نیاز آبی گیاه تا مرحله رسیدگی فیزیولوژیک و 2- تنش آبی: آبیاری بر اساس نیاز آبی گیاه تا انتهای مرحله گل‌دهی (قطع آبیاری پس از مرحله گل‌دهی)] به‌عنوان کرت­های اصلی و دو سطح بقایای گیاهی [1- حذف بقایا و 2- برگرداندن 30 درصد بقایای گندم به خاک] و چهار سطح کود [1- صفر کیلوگرم نیتروژن در هکتار (شاهد)، 2- کاربرد 100 کیلوگرم نیتروژن در هکتار، 3- استفاده تلفیقی از باکتری آزوسپیریلوم ((Azospirillum brasilense و 50 کیلوگرم نیتروژن در هکتار و 4- تلقیح بذرها با باکتری آزوسپیریلوم] که به‌صورت فاکتوریل در کرت‌های فرعی قرار گرفتند. نتایج نشان داد که قطع آبیاری پس از گل‌دهی، تنش آبی شدیدی را در مرحله­ی پر شدن دانه بر گیاه جو وارد کرد و وزن هزار دانه، تعداد دانه در سنبله و تعداد پنجه بارور در مترمربع را کاهش داد. برهم‌کنش تیمار آبیاری و منبع کود نیتروژن بر عملکرد دانه در سطح یک درصد معنی­دار بود. بیشترین عملکرد دانه در تیمار آبیاری مطلوب و استفاده تلفیقی از کود نیتروژن و باکتری (۴۰۴۹ کیلوگرم در هکتار) به‌دست آمد. اثر برهم‌کنش آبیاری × منبع کود نیتروژن نشان داد که تنش آبی عملکرد دانه را در همه سطوح کودی نسبت به آبیاری مطلوب کاهش داد. امّا، این کاهش در تیمار­های مختلف کود نیتروژن متفاوت بود (1/24، 8/46، 3/44 و 1/22 درصد، به‌ترتیب در تیمار­های شاهد، نیتروژن خالص، تلفیقی و زیستی). با توجه به این‌که کمترین مقدار کاهش عملکرد دانه به‌واسطه تنش آبی در شرایط استفاده از کود زیستی و سپس در شاهد رخ داد، می­توان این تیمار­های کودی را برای استفاده در شرایط قطع آبیاری پس از گل‌دهی توصیه کرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Effects of Different Nitrogen Fertilizer Sources and Crop Residues on Yield and Yield Components of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) under Late Season Water Stress

نویسندگان [English]

  • Maryam Niazi Ardakani
  • Vahid Barati
  • Ehsan bijanzadeh
  • Ali behpouri
چکیده [English]

Introduction
Inappropriate use of chemical inputs damages soil beneficial microorganisms and consumer health. In order to reduce or eventually eliminate chemical inputs, bio-agroecosystems was founded. Azospirillum is one of the most studied genera as nitrogen fixing bacteria in agroecosystems. About 70 percent of the experiments have demonstrated the Azospirilum ability for increasing crop yield. Furthermore, some studies have shown that Azospirilum has a stress-reduction mechanism. Therefore, it seems that the Azospirilum is a suitable microorganism for low yielding conditions (water and N) of southern Iran. On the contrary, with respect to the importance of soil organic matter for microorganisms survival, its deficiency in soils of southern Iran is the biggest challenge for using the microorganisms as biofertilizers. Also, experiments on the interactive effects of crop residue, water deficiency and N sources (biological or chemical) on barley yield are quite scarce in southern Iran. Therefore, the aims of this study were to investigate the effects of crop residue management, different N sources (such as biological and chemical) and water stress conditions on barley yield in arid conditions of southern Iran (Fars province).
Materials and Methods
This research was conducted at the experimental farm of the Darab Agricultural College of Shiraz University during the 2017-2018 growing season. A split factorial layout based on a randomized complete block design with three replications was used. Treatments included: two irrigation levels as the main plots [1. Normal (IRN): irrigation based on the plant's water requirement up to the physiological maturity and 2. Deficit irrigation (IRDI): irrigation based on the plant's water requirement up to the anthesis stage (cutting of irrigation after anthesis)]. Also, subplots were two levels of plant residues [1. without residue, 2. returning 30% of wheat residues to soil] and four fertilizer sources [N0, no nitrogen fertilizer (control) ;N100, 100 kg N ha-1; Bio + N50, Biofertilizer (Azospirillum brasilense) + 50 kg N ha-1 and Bio, Biofertilizer (Azospirillum brasilense)]. Biological yield and grain yield, yield components, plant height, spike length and chlorophyll content of flag leaf were measured. Then, the harvest index was calculated. Data were analyzed by using SAS 9.1 software and the means were separated using Duncan’s multiple range test at 5% probability level.
Results and Discussion
The results showed that the cutting of irrigation after anthesis could cause severe water stress in the grain-filling period of the barley life cycle and consequently reduction of 1000-seed weight, the number of seeds per spike and the number of fertile tillers per m2. The interaction effect of irrigation regime × N fertilizer source on grain yield was significant at 1% probability level. The highest grain yield was achieved in IRN and Bio + N50 (4049 kg ha-1). Water stress reduced grain yield at all N fertilizer sources as compared with IRN. However, this reduction was different in N fertilizer sources (24.1%, 46.8%, 44.3% and 22.1% in N0, N100, Bio + N50 and Bio, respectively). With respect to the lowest amount of grain yield reduction due to water stress in Bio and then in N0 treatments and economic considerations, N0 treatment can be recommended for use in the cutting of irrigation after anthesis (IRDI) strategy.
Conclusion
According to the results of this study, the highest barley grain yield achieved by the integrated N fertilizer [Biofertilizer (Azospirillum brasilense) + 50 kg N ha-1] in normal irrigation. Deficit irrigation after anthesis significantly decreased barley grain yield at all N sources. Therefore, this irrigation regime was not recommended for barley farms of southern Iran. But if farmers intend to the cutting of irrigation after anthesis because of water resources deficiency, with respect to the lack of significant difference among N sources in this condition, it is recommended that no N fertilizer is applied.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Azospirillum bacteria
  • Biomass yield
  • Harvest index
  • Inoculation
Ajam-norozi, H., Dadashi, M.R., Faraji, A., Mosanaiey, H., and Pessarakli, M., 2016. The simultaneous effect of seed quality, plant density, and nitrogen fertilizer on physiological and yield characteristics of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Journal of Iranian Plant Ecophysiological Research 11(44): 20-32. (In Persian with English Summary)
Alizadeh, A., 2001. Soil-water-plant relationship. Emam Reza University, Mashhad, Iran. (In Persian)
Amoo-Aghaie, R., Mostajeran, A., and Emtiazi, G., 2004. Effect of Azospirillum bacteria on some growth parameters and yield of three wheat cultivars. Journal of Water and Soil Science 7(2): 127-138. (In Persian with English Summary)
Anderson, D., and Russell, G., 1964. Effects of various quantities of straw mulch on the growth and yield of spring and winter wheat. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 44(1): 109-118.
Arzanesh, M.H., Alikhani, H., Khavazi, K., Rahimian, H., and Miransari, M., 2010. Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) growth enhancement by Azospirillum sp. under drought stress. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 27: 197-205.
Azadi, S., Siadat, S., Naseri, R., Soleiman-fard, A., and Mirzai, A., 2015. Effect of integrated application of Azotobacter chroococcum and Azospirillum brasilense and nitrogen chemical fertilizers on qualitative and quantitative of durum wheat. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology 26(2): 129- 146. (In Persian with English Summary)
Bahari-Saravi, S., and Pirdashti, H., 2014. Evaluation of application of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and phosphate solubilizer (PSM) on yield and yield components of wheat (N80) in different levels of nitrogen and phosphorus in greenhouse conditions. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 10(4): 681-689. (In Persian with English Summary)
Barati, V., and Ghadiri, H., 2016. Effects of drought stress and nitrogen fertilizer on yield, yield components and protein content of two barley cultivars. Journal of Crop Production and Processing 6(20): 191-207. (In Persian with English Summary)
Barati, V., Ghadiri, H., Zand-Parsa, S., and Karimian, N., 2015. Nitrogen and water use efficiencies and yield response of barley cultivars under different irrigation and nitrogen regimes in a semi-arid mediterranean climate. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 61(1): 15-32.
Barik, A., and Goswami, A., 2003. Efficacy of biofertilizers with nitrogen levels on growth, productivity and economics in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Indian Journal of Agronomy 48: 100-102.
Bredemeier, C., 2005. Laser-induced chlorophyll fluorescence sensing as a tool for site-specific nitrogen fertilizer evaluation under controlled environmental and field conditions in wheat and maize. Ph.D. Dissertation, Technical University of Munich, Germany.
Compant, S., Van Der Heijden, M.G., and Sessitsch, A., 2010. Climate change effects on beneficial plant–microorganism interactions. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 73(2): 197-214.
Cox, W.J., and Jolliff, G.D., 2007. Growth and yield of durum wheat under soil water deficits. Agronomy Journal 78: 226-230.
Creus, C.M., Pereyra, M.A., Casanovas, E.M., Sueldo, R.J., and Barassi, C.A., 2010. Plant growth-promoting effects of rhizobacteria on abiotic stressed plants. Azospirillum-grasses model. The Americas Journal of Plant Science and Biotechnology 4(1): 49-59.
Demir, A.O., Goksoy, A.T., Buyukcangaz, H., Turan, Z.M., and Koksal, E.S., 2006. Deficit irrigation of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) in a sub-humid climate. Irrigation Science 24(4): 279-289.
Dideban, B., Beygi, D., Nabi, A., and Sadeghi. L., 2012. Effect of different levels of nitrogen fertilizer on chlorophyll of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). First National Conference on Agriculture in Difficult Environmental Conditions, Islamic Azad University-Ramhormoz Branch, Ramhormoz, Iran, 10 May 2012. (In Persian)
Fadaei, A., Gholami, A., Ramezan-pour, M., and Abbas-doust, H., 2014. The effect of combination of organic and chemical fertilizers on some growth characteristics of wheat. the First National Conference on the New Opportunities for Agricultural Production and Employment in the East of the Country, Birjand University, Birjand, Iran, 14 February 2014. (In Persian)
Fallah-Heravi, A., Abbasdukht, H., Zare-Feizabadi, A., and Gholami, A., 2015. Effects of conventional and conservation tillage with management residue on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) physiological properties. Iranian Journal of Filed Crop Science 47: 277-289. (In Persian with English Summary)
Farhoodi, R., Chaichi, M.R., Majnoun-hosseini, N., and Savaghebi, G., 2008. Effect of wheat residue management on soil properties and sunflower yield in double cropping system. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Sciences 39(1): 11-21. (In Persian with English Summary)
Foroud, N., Mundel, H.H., Saindon, G., and Entz, T., 2008. Effect of level and timing of moisture stress on soybean yield, protein, and oil responses. Field Crops Research 31: 195-209.
Grimes, D., Yamada, H., and Hughes, S., 1987. Climate-normalized cotton leaf water potentials for irrigation scheduling. Agricultural Water Management 12: 293-304.
Hadi, H., Babaei, N., Daneshian, J., Arzanesh, M., and Hamidi, A., 2012. Effects of Azospirillum lipoferum on seedling characteristics derived from sunflower (Helianthus annus L.) seed water deficit conditions. Journal of Agroecology 3(3): 320-327. (In Persian with English Summary)
Hegde, D., Dwivedi, B., and Sudhakara Babu, S., 1999. Biofertilizers for cereal production in India: A review. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science 69: 73-83.
Heydarian-burkhob, Z., Asgharzadeh, N., and Sarikhani, M., 2011. A look at the importance of Azospirillum bioactive fertilizers and their application in sustainable agriculture. First Congress on Fertilizer Challenges in Iran, Soil and Water Research Institute, Tehran, Iran, 1 March 2011. (In Persian)
Hay, R.K.M., and Walker, A.J., 1989. An introduction to the physiology of crop yield. Longman Scientific and Technical, Harlow, England.
Hojati-pour, I., Jafari haghighi, B., and Dorostkar, M., 2014. The effect of integration of biological and chemical fertilizers on yield, yield components and growth indexes of wheat. Journal of Ecophysiology 15: 36-48. (In Persian with English Summary)
Institute S., 2004. SAS/GRAPH 9.1 Reference. SAS Institute.
Kamali, M., Shoor, M., Nemati, S., Lakzian, A., and Khazaee, H., 2018. Evaluate the effect of deficit irrigation on water relations, growth and physicochemical changes in Petunia (Petunia garandiflora) var. “Supercascade”, “Tango Blue” and “Tango White”. Journal of Plant Process and Function 7(23): 283-296. (In Persian with English Summary)
Kandil, A.A., El-Hindi, M.H., Badawi, M.A., El-Morarsy, S.A., and Kalboush, F.A.H.M., 2011. Response of wheat to rates of nitrogen, biofertilizers and land leveling. Crop Environment 2(1): 46-51.
Kapulnik, Y., Gafny, R., and Okon, Y., 2010. Efeect of Azospirillum spp. inoculation on root development and NO3 uptake in wheat in hydroponic system. Canadian Journal of Botany 63: 627-631.
Kasim, W.A., Gaafar, R.M., Abou-Ali, R.M., Omar, M.N., and Hewait, H.M., 2016. Effect of biofilm forming plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on salinity tolerance in barley. Annals of Agricultural Sciences 61(2):217-227.
Kennedy, I.R., Choudhury, A.T.M.A., and Kecskes, M.L., 2004. Non-symbiotic bacterial diazotrophs in crop-farming systems: can their potential for plant growth promotion be better exploited? Soil Biology and Biochemistry 36: 1229-1244.
Keshavarz-nezhad, A., Kazemini, S.A.R., and Bahrani, M.J., 2014. Yield and nitrogen use efficiency of wheat as influenced by different levels of nitrogen and corn, rapeseed, sunflower and wheat residues. Journal of Crop Production and Processing 3(10): 181-191. (In Persian with English Summary)
Khosravi, H., 2015. Azotobacter and its role in soil fertility management. Land Management Journal 2(2): 79-94. (In Persian with English Summary)
Kumar, K., and Goh, K., 1999. Crop residues and management practices: effects on soil quality, soil nitrogen dynamics, crop yield, and nitrogen recovery. Advances in Agronomy 68: 197-319.
Leilah, A.A., and Al-Khateeb, S.A., 2005. Statistical analysis of wheat yield under drought conditions. Journal of Arid Environment 61: 483-496.
Liu, X.L., Gao, Z., Liu, C.S., and Si, L.Z., 1996. Effect of combined application of organic manure and fertilizers on crop yield and soil fertility in a located experiment. Acta Pedologica Sinica 33: 138-147.
Marulanda, A., Barea, J.M., and Azcon, R., 2009. Stimulation of plant growth and drought tolerance by native microorganisms (AM fungi and bacteria) from dry environments: mechanisms related to bacterial effectiveness. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 28(2): 115-124.
Pazoki, A., 2016. Effects of humic acid and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs) on yield and yield components of durum wheat under drought stress condition in Shahr-e-Rey region. Cereal Research 6:105-117. (In Persian with English Summary)
Pour-eid, S., Habibi, D., and Tohidlou, Q., 2013. The study of the effect of growth promoting bacteria (Pseudomonas, Azospirillum) and nitrogen fertilizers on wheat growth and yield. First National Conference on Sustainable Agricultural Development and Healthy Environment, Hamedan, Iran. 26 February 2013. (In Persian)
Rahimzade, S., Sohrabi, Y., Heidari, R., and Pirzade, R., 2011. The effect of biofertilizers on some morphological traits and performance of medicinal herbs. Journal of Horticulture Sciences 25: 335-334. (In Persian with English Summary)
Remans, R., Croonenborghs, A., and Gutierez, R., 2010. Effects of plant growth prompting rhizobacteria on nodulation of Phseolus vulgaris L. are dependent on plant P nutrition. European Journal of Plant Pathology 119: 341-351.
Reynolds, M., Foulkes, J., Slafer, G.A., Berry, P., Parry, M.A.J., Snape, J.W., and Angus, W.J., 2009. Raising yield potential in wheat. Journal of Experimental Botany 68:183-190.
Sadeghi, H., and Bahrani, M.J., 2009. Effects of crop residue and nitrogen rates on yield and yield components of two dryland wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars. Plant Production Science 12: 497-502.
Sadeghi, H., and Kazemeini, S.A.R., 2015. Effect of crop residue management and nitrogen fertilizer on grain yield and yield components of two barley cultivars under dryland conditions. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences 13(3): 436-451. (In Persian with English Summary)
Sandhya, V., Ali, S., Grover, M., Kishore, N., and Venkateswarlu, B., 2010. Pseudomonas sp. strain P45 protects sunflowers seedlings from drought stress through improved soil structure. Journal of Oilseed Research 26: 600-601.
Sarig, S., Blum, A., and Okon, Y., 1988. Improvement of the water status and yield of field-grown grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) by inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense. The Journal of Agricultural Science 110: 271-277.
Shahpary, F., and Fateh, E., 2016. Different residue type and management and nitrogen on yield and quality of durum wheat (Triticum durum L.) Journal of Crop Production 9(3): 87-104. (In Persian with English Summary)
Sharma, A.K., 2003. Biofertilizers for sustainable agriculture. Agrobios, India.
Sieling, K., Schroder, H., Finck, M., and Hanus, H., 1998. Yield, N uptake and apparent N use efficiency of winter wheat and winter barley grown in different cropping systems. The Journal of Agricultural Science 131(4): 375-387.
Siosemarde, A., Fateh, H., and Badakhshan H., 2014. Responses of photosynthesis, cell membrane stability and antioxidative enzymes to drought stress and nitrogen fertilizer in two barley (Hordeum vulgare) cultivars under controlled condition. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 12(2): 215-228. (In Persian with English Summary)
Sohrabi, S., Fateh, A., Aeeneband, A., and Rahnama, A., 2015. Evaluation the effect of the residue management and different nitrogen sources on wheat yield and components. Journal of Agroecology 6(3): 645-655. (In Persian with English Summary)
Somasegaran, P., and Hoben, H.J., 2012. Handbook for rhizobia: methods in legume-rhizobium technology. Springer Science and Business Media, University of Hawaii, New York, USA.
Taiz, L., and Zeiger, E., 2010. Plant physiology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.
Tale, A., and Haddad, R., 2011. Study of silicon effects on antioxidant enzyme activities and osmotic adjustment of wheat under drought stress. Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 47: 17-27.
Taylor, A.J., Smith, C.J., and Wilson, I.B., 2001. Effect of irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer on yield, oil content, nitrogen accumulation and water use of canola (Brassica napus L.). Fertilizer Research 29:249-260.
Torbert, H.A., Potter, K.N., Hoffman, D.W., Gerik, T.J., and Richardson, C., 2000. Surface residue and soil moisture affect fertilizer loss in simulated runoff on a heavy clay soil. Agronomy Journal 91: 606-612.
Van Herwaarden, A., Farquhar, G., Angus, J., Richards, R., and Howe, G., 1998. 'Haying-off', the negative grain yield response of dryland wheat to nitrogen fertilizer. I. Biomass, grain yield, and water use. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 49: 1067-1082.
Wallace, J., Frick, B.L., Telford, L., and Martens, J.T., 2017. Organic Field Crop Handbook. Canadian Organic Growers, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. 422p.
Wu, S., Cao, Z., Li, Z., Cheung, K., and Wong, M., 2005. Effects of biofertilizer containing N-fixer, P and K solubilizers and AM fungi on maize growth: a greenhouse trial. Geoderma 125: 155-166.
Zadoks, J.C., Chang, T.T., and Konzak, C.F., 1974. A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14: 415-421.