ارزیابی خصوصیات کیفی و عملکرد برخی از ارقام تجاری چغندرقند (Beta vulgaris L.) در استان همدان (نهاوند و اسدآباد)

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 بخش تحقیقات چغندرقند، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان همدان، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، همدان، ایران

2 مؤسسه تحقیقات اصلاح و تهیه بذر چغندرقند، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج، ایران

3 بخش تحقیقات چغندرقند، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان آذربایجان غربی، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، ارومیه، ایران

چکیده

به‌منظور ارزیابی عملکرد ریشه و خصوصیات کیفی برخی از ارقام تجاری اصلاح‌شده چغندرقند (Beta vulgaris L.) در استان همدان، آزمایشی در دو منطقه اسدآباد و نهاوند در سال 1402 در مزرعه کشاورز انجام شد. ارقام مورد بررسی شامل پنج رقم تجاری اصلاح‌شده داخلی شامل ارقام سینا، نیکا، شکوفا، آسیا و دنا به همراه یک رقم شاهد خارجی اورسلینا بود. نتایج تحقیق نشان داد که در هر دو محیط نهاوند و اسدآباد، رقم خارجی اورسلینا از بالاترین خصوصیات کیفی و عملکرد شکر برخوردار بود. در بین ارقام داخلی، ارقام دنا و سینا در منطقه نهاوند و رقم نیکا در منطقه اسدآباد از عملکرد قند بیشتری نسبت به سایر ارقام تولید کردند. براساس نتایج تجریه خوشه­ای در محیط نهاوند خوشه اول شامل رقم اورسلینا و خوشه دوم شامل ارقام دنا، آسیا و شکوفا و در محیط اسدآباد خوشه اول که اورسلینا و خوشه چهارم که رقم نیکا را شامل می­شدند به‌عنوان خوشه­های برتر انتخاب شدند. براساس تجزیه به عامل­ها، دو عامل با تبیین 57/95 و 94/95 درصد از تغییرات داده­ها به‌ترتیب برای نهاوند و اسدآباد شناسایی شدند. به‌طور کلی، با توجه به نتایج رقم اورسلینا به‌عنوان رقم برتر در هر دو محیط انتخاب شد. در بین ارقام داخلی نیز برای مکان نهاوند ارقام دنا و آسیا و برای مکان اسدآباد رقم نیکا به‌عنوان ارقام با خصوصیات کمّی و کیفی بهتر معرفی شدند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation of Quality Characteristics and Yield of some Commercial Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) Cultivars in Hamedan Province (Nahavand and Asadabad)

نویسندگان [English]

  • hamed mansouri 1
  • Valiallah Yousefabadi 2
  • Hamze Hamze 1
  • Heydar Azizi 3
1 Sugar Beet Research Department, Hamedan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Hamedan, Iran
2 Sugar Beet Seed Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran
3 Sugar Beet Research Department, West Azarbaijan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Urmia, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction
Sugar beet is the main source of sugar production in Iran, accounting for approximately 60% of the country's sugar production comes. The rest comes from sugar cane (Ribeiro et al., 2016). Hamedan province, with a cultivated area of ​​about 7 percent of the total cultivated area of ​​the country, is one of the most important provinces in terms of sugar beet cultivation and sugar production. Nahavand and Asadabad regions also have the largest cultivated area of ​​sugar beet in Hamedan Province and are considered the most important sugar beet cultivation areas in the province. Seed is a crucial agricultural input. It provides farmers with significant added value by improving the efficiency of other inputs, such as water, fertilizer, pesticides, and machinery. Maximizing yield is impossible without using the right seeds, even with significant energy investment (Sadeghzadeh Hemayati et al., 2024). The primary aim of conducting variety comparison experiments is to select and introduce suitable varieties to farmers in each region, this study was conducted to compare sugar beet varieties and introduce the best variety in the Nahavand and Asadabad regions of Hamedan province.
 
Materials and Methods
To evaluate the root yield and quality characteristics of some breeding commercial sugar beet varieties in Hamedan province, an experiment was conducted in two regions: Asadabad-Vanderabad Village and Nahavand-Gyan Village, in 2023, under farm conditions. The study included five Iranian commercial cultivars—Sina, Nika, Shokofa, Asia, and Dena—as well as a foreign cultivar, Urslina, which served as the control. Planting took place in Nahavand on March 10, 2022, and in Asadabad on April 15, 2023. A total of 30 planting lines, each measuring 300 meters in length and spaced 50 centimeters apart, were allocated for each cultivar. Each cultivar was planted in an area of 4,500 square meters. The farmer carried out all land preparation and farm management operations in accordance with local customs. At the end of the growing season, four samples (as four replicates) of each variety were randomly harvested and weighed, and root yield was obtained. The harvested roots were washed, pulped, and sent to the Sugar Technology Laboratory at the Sugar Beet Seed Institute for quality characteristic measurement. Cluster analysis and factor analysis were performed using R v.4.2.2 software.
 
Results and Discussion
Because of the significant interaction effect between cultivar and environment, which indicated independent responses of cultivars in the two different locations, all data analyses were performed separately for each site. In Nahavand, the highest sugar content and white sugar content were observed with 18.24 and 15.87 percent, respectively, and the highest sugar yield and white sugar yield were observed with 19.29 and 16.79 ton.ha-1, respectively, in the foreign cultivar Urslina. Among the Iranian cultivars, the two cultivars Dena and Asia had the highest yield. In Asadabad, results showed that the foreign cultivar Urslina had the highest values ​​among the studied cultivars in terms of sugar content (18.29%), sugar yield (19.80 ton.ha-1), white sugar content (16.17%), white sugar yield (17.51 ​​ ton.ha-1), and sugar extraction coefficient (88.4%). Cluster analysis results indicated that the cultivars were grouped into three clusters in Nahavand and four clusters in Asadabad. Based on the results of the cluster analysis conducted in the Nahavand environment, two clusters were introduced as superior clusters. The first cluster included the Urslina variety, while the second cluster comprised the Dena, Asia, and Shokofa varieties. In the Asadabad environment, the first cluster also included the Urslina variety, and the fourth cluster contained the Nika variety, both of which were recognized as superior clusters. Factor analysis identified two significant factors, explaining 95.57% of the variation in Nahavand and 95.94% in Asadabad.
 
Conclusion
Overall, the Urslina cultivar emerged as the superior cultivar in both environments. Among the Iranian cultivars, the Dena and Asia cultivars were recommended for the Nahavand environment, while the Nika cultivar was suggested for the Asadabad environment due to their better quantitative and qualitative characteristics.
 






 



 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Biplot
  • Cluster analysis
  • Commercial cultivar
  • Factor analysis
  • Sugar yield

Authors retain the copyright.This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

  1. Akyüz, A., & Ersus, S. (2021). Optimization of enzyme-assisted protein extraction from the sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) leaves for alternative plant protein concentrate production. Food Chemistry, 335, 127673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127673
  2. Farshadafar, E. (2005). Principles and Multivariate Statistical Methods (2th ed.). Publications Taq Bostan. Kermanshah, Iran. pp. 734. (In Persian).
  3. Fotouhi, K., Majidi, E., Rajabi, A., & Azizinejad, R. (2017). Study of genetic variation for drought tolerance in sugar beet half-sib families. Journal of Sugar Beet, 33(1), 1-16. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/22092/jsb.2017.107740.1130
  4. Hassani, M., Hamze, H., Mansori, H., Fathullah Taleghani, D., Jalilian, A., & Soltani Idliki, J. (2021). Evaluation of genetic parameters, relationships between traits and grouping of new sugar beet hybrids in terms of quantitative and qualitative traits under Rhizomonia contamination condition. Journal of Crop Breeding, 13(38), 149-159. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/52547/jcb.13.38.149
  5. Hassani, M., Hamze, H., & Mansouri, M. (2022). Compatibility and stability of new rhizomania resistant multigerm hybrids in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris ). Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 33(1), 113-128. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22034/saps.2022.49322.2787
  6. Hu, X.H., Wu, Y.M., & Wang, X.W. (2016). Principal component analysis and comprehensive evaluation of amino acid in different varieties of sugar beet. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 32(27), 69-75.
  7. Hu, X.H., Jian-Zhou, C., & Hong-Yang, Z. (2019). Comprehensive evaluation of different sugar beet varieties by using principal component and cluster analyses. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1176(4), 042021. https://doi.org/1088/1742-6596/1176/4/042021
  8. Jia, X.F., Zhu, S.M., Wang, Q., Long, W., & Zhang, X.L. (2015). Principal component analysis and cluster analysis of the elements in sugar beet roots of different geographical origins in Xinjiang. Modern Food Science and Technology, 7, 302-308. https://doi.org/13982/j.mfst.1673-9078.2015.7.047
  9. Kuska, M.T., Von Tiedemann, S., & Mahlein, A. (2020). How table sugar is produced from sugar beets. Frontiers for Young Minds, 8, 108. https://doi.org/3389/frym.2020.00108
  10. Leonard, S.T., & Droege, M. (2008). The uses and benefits of cluster analysis in pharmacy research. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 4(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/1016/j.sapharm.2007.02.001
  11. Mansouri, H., Hamze, H., & Hassani, M. (2024a). Identification of resistant pollinator lines to soil-borne Rhizoctonia solani JG Kühn, 1858 in sugar beet using SIIG technique. Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus, 89(3), 199-208.
  12. Mansouri, H., Hamze, H., Hassani, M., & Aliverdi, A. (2024b). Resistance evaluation and identification of new sugar beet pollinator lines resistant to Rhizoctonia root and crown rot. Journal of Sugar Beet, 40(1), 31-46. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/22092/JSB.2024.366460.1364
  13. Monteiro, F., Frese L., Castro, S., Duarte, M.C., Paulo, O.S., Loureiro, J., & Romeiras, M.M. (2018). Genetic and genomic tools to assist sugar beet improvement: The value of the crop wild relatives. Frontiers in Plant Science, 9, 74-85. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00074
  14. Mostafavi, K., Orazizadeh, M.R., & Rajabi, A. (2017). Genotype - environment interaction pattern analysis for sugar beet (Beta vulgaris ) cultivars yield using AMMI multivariate method. Journal of Sugar Beet, 33(2), 135-147. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22092/jsb.2018.107335.1126
  15. Ribeiro, I.C., Pinheiro, C., Ribeiro, C.M., Veloso, M.M., Simoes-Costa, C., Evaristo, I., & Ricardo, C.P. (2016). Genetic diversity and physiological performance of Portuguese wild beet (Beta vulgaris spp. maritima) from three contrasting habitats. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7(1), 1293. https://doi.10.3389/fpls.2016.01293
  16. Sadeghzadeh Hemayati, S., Hassani, M., Jalilian, A.L.I., Mirzai, M.R., Hamze, H., & Mansouri, H. (2024). Evaluation and comparison of quantitative and qualitative characteristics of commercial sugar beet cultivars in the western region of the country (Kermanshah and Lorestan). Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 34(1), 113-128. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/22034/saps.2023.53293.2920
  17. Sarica, D. (2024). Forecasting sugar beet production in turkey using the Box-Jenkins Method. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 26(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/22034/JAST.26.1.1
  18. SBSI (Sugar Beet Seed Institute). (2023). Annual Research Report. Sugar Beet Seed Institute Press. Karaj, Iran. pp. 157. (In Persian).
  19. Taleghani, D., Rajabi, A., Saremirad, A., & Fasahat, P. (2023). Stability analysis and selection of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) genotypes using AMMI, BLUP, GGE biplot and MTSI. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 10019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37217-7

 

CAPTCHA Image