اثر مدیریت‌های مختلف خاک‌ورزی بر کیفیت علوفه و دانه ذرت (Zea mays L.) تحت تأثیر منابع مختلف کودهای آلی و شیمیایی

نوع مقاله: علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 مرکز تحقیقات کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی سیستان

2 دانشگاه زابل

3 مرکز تحقیقات کشاورزی زابل

10.22067/jag.v10i2.59988

چکیده

در راستای توسعه کشاورزی پایدار، این آزمایش به‌صورت کرت‌های یک بار خرد شده در قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار در مرکز تحقیقات کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی سیستان طی دو سال زراعی 1392 و 1393 اجرا گردید. تیمارها‌ی آزمایش شامل خاک‌ورزی به‌عنوان عامل اصلی در دو سیستم متداول ( شخم و مخلوط کردن کود با خاک) و بی‌خاک‌ورزی (باقی گذاشتن بقایای کود سبز بر سطح خاک و کشت مستقیم ذرت (Zea mays L.) و منابع کود: T0: شاهد (بدون مصرف کود)،T1: کود سبز جو (Hordeum vulgare L.) بدون مصرف کود دامی و شیمیایی، T2: کود سبز با مصرف کامل کود شیمیایی توصیه شده (NPK) به جو شامل اوره، سوپر فسفات تریپل و سولفات پتاسیم به‌ترتیب به‌میزان 165، 90 و 75 کیلوگرم در هکتار، T3: کود سبز با دو سوم کود شیمیایی به جو و یک سوم باقی مانده به ذرت،T4 : کود سبز با یک سوم کود شیمیایی به جو و دو سوم باقی مانده به ذرت،T5 : کود سبز جو با مخلوط نصف کود دامی و شیمیایی و T6: کود سبز با 40 تن کود دامی به عنوان عامل فرعی بودند. زمان برگرداندن جو به خاک مرحله خوشه‌دهی بود. نتایج نشان داد که اختلاط کود با خاک در مقایسه با بی‌خاک‌ورزی منجر به افزایش عملکرد دانه، علوفه‌تر و خشک، میزان نیتروژن، پتاسیم، فسفر و خاکستر دانه و کاهش درصد الیاف نامحلول در شوینده خنثی (NDF)گردید. منابع کود آلی و شیمیایی باعث افزایش معنی‌دار عملکرد دانه، علوفه‌تر و خشک، میزان نیتروژن، پتاسیم، فسفر، روی و خاکستر دانه شدند، ولی بر درصد NDF روند کاهشی نشان دادند. برهمکنش سال در خاک‌ورزی در منبع کود نشان داد که بیشترین عملکرد دانه، علوفه‌تر و خشک در سال دوم در سیستم اختلاط کود با خاک و در منبع کود سبز جو با مخلوط نصف کود دامی و شیمیایی با میانگین عملکرد دانه و علوفه‌تر به‌ترتیب برابر 400/9 و 151/110 تن در هکتار حاصل شد. بر اساس نتایج مخلوط کود سبز با نصف کود دامی و شیمیایی همراه با اختلاط کود با خاک برای تولید کمی و کیفی دانه و علوفه ذرت مناسب می باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Effect of Different Tillage Management on Maize Forage and Grain Quality and Quantity under the Influence of Different Sources of Organic and Chemical Fertilizers

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ahmad Ghasemi 1
  • Ahmad Ghanbari 2
  • baratali fakheri 2
  • hamidreza fanaie 3
1 Zabol university
2 Zabol university
3 Assistant professor of Agriculture and Natural Resource Research Center of Sistan
چکیده [English]

Introduction
Lack of attention to the quantity and quality of forage crops led to shortages and low qualities of meat and dairy products. Using cattle manure, plant residues, and green manure increased the dynamic components of the soil. Recently the tendency of farmers toward organic fertilizers have increased due to high costs, demolition of proper soil conditions, environmental consequences and low quality of products produced with chemical fertilizers. It has been reported that combination of manure with chemical fertilizer has increased soil fertility and crop's quality and quantity characteristics due to meeting nutritional needs and increasing the input absorption and use efficiency.
Materials and Methods
In order to assess the effects of different fertilizer sources on maize yield and yield components under different tillage managements, a field experiment was conducted at Zahak Agricultural Research Station for two years (from 2013 to 2014) with a split plot arrangement based on completely randomized block design with three replications. The main plot factors were tillage and no tillage, and sub plot factors were: 1-control, 2-barley green manure without application of fertilizer, 3-barley green manure with application of 100% chemical fertilizer (NPK) to the barley, 4- green manure with 2/3 of chemical fertilizer to the barley and 1/3 to the maize, 5- green manure with 1/3 of chemical fertilizer to the barley and 2/3 to the maize, 6- barley green manure with 50% of animal manure and chemical fertilizer, 7- barley green manure with 40 t.ha-1 of animal manure. The total amount of Nitrogen was measured by digestion method. Likewise, the distillation and titration was tested by using Kjeldahl method. Phosphorus content was measured by a spectrophotometer using colorimetric approach. Potassium content was measured using wet digestion method with salicylic acid and hydrogen peroxide obtained using a photometer movie. The concentration of Zn was measured by atomic absorption. Measurement of grain ash was done through burning and using an electric furnace. Combined variance analysis of data was performed using MSTAT-C statistical software, and the comparison of the means was done at the 5% probability level using Duncan multiple range test.
Results and Discussion
The highest yield was obtained from conventional tillage, 1563 kg.ha-1 more than non-tillage. Fertilizer sources had a significant effect on the concentration of Zn, N, P, K, NDF, grain production, fresh and dry forage production and ash content of the grains. Returning green manure to the soil, along with chemical fertilizer application, not only increased P and N availability in the soil for the next crop, but also simultaneously increased organic matter as well as biological, chemical and physical improvement of the soil properties. The highest (7019 kg.ha-1) and lowest (2097 kg.ha-1) grain yield belonged to T5 and the control treatments, respectively. The highest content of grain ash was observed in the mixed treatment of green manure, cow manure, and chemical fertilizers (1.77%) and its lowest rate was obtained in control (1.125 %). The results showed that addition of cattle and green manure to the soil increased the plant ash, which shows the superiority of these organic manures to chemical fertilizers.
Conclusion
Based on the obtained results of this experiment, it can be inferred that conventional tillage had better effects than no tillage due to its more suitability for soil degrading bacteria cultures, better acceleration of mineralization, and better root growth, resulted in greater access to nutrients and water, and ultimately improving plant growth. During the first year, the root growth limited mainly due to high soil density in the no-tillage treatments. Moreover, because of slow degradation, water and nutrients absorption was low. Due to chemical fertilizer application, nutrient supply was provided faster for the plant. Nevertheless, in long term, it would pollute the surrounding environment and degrade the soil structure. During its converting process in longer period, organic fertilizers provide environmental health and sustainable productivity of the soil; however, consolidated application of organic and chemical fertilizers under a conventional tillage system, support the initial growth, accelerate mineralization, and eventually, increase the uptake of nutrients such as N, P, K, Zn, and Ash content, leads to an increasing yield of maize.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Green manure
  • NDF
  • Seed ash
  • Seed P
  • Seed yield
  1. Acharya, C.L., and Sharma, P.D. 1994. Tillage and mulch effects on soil physical environment, root growth, nutrient uptake and yield of maize and wheat on an Alfisol in north–west India. Soil and Tillage Research 32(4): 291-302.
  2. Agyenim-Boateng, S., Zickermann, J., and Kornahrens, M. 2006. Poultry manure effect on growth and yield of maize. West African Journal of Applied Ecology 9: 1-11.
  3. Almodares, A., Jafarinia, M., and Hadi, M.R. 2009. The effect of nitrogen fertilizer on chemical compositions in corn and sweet sorghum. American-Eurasian Journal Agriculture and Environment Science 6: 441-446.
  4. Arzani, H. 2010. Forage quality and the need of daily livestock grazing from grassland. Tehran University Press, Tehran, Iran 354 pp. (In Persian)
  5. Astier, M., Maass, J.M., Etchevers-Barra, J.D., Pena, J.J., and de Leon Gonzalez, F. 2006. Short-term green manure and tillage management effects on maize yield and soil quality in an Andisol. Soil and Tillage Research 88(1-2): 153-159.
  6. Baker, D., and Suhr, N. 1990. Atomic absorption and flame emission spectrometry. In: Al. Page et al. (Ed). Methods of Soil Analysis Part 2, 2nd ed., Agronomy. Monogr. 9, ASA, Madison, WI. p. 13-29.
  7. Bibordi, M., Malakoti, J., Amirmokri, A., and Nafisi, M. 2000. Optimal Production and Consumption of Chemical Fertilizer in the Event of Sustainable Agriculture. Agricultural Education Press 282 pp. (In Persian)
  8. Black, C., Evans, D., Ensminger, L., White, J., and Clark, F. 1965. Methods of Soil Analysis. American Society of Agronomy Madison p. 499-510.
  9. Cox, W., Kalonge, S., Cherey, D., and Reid, W. 1993. Growth, yield and quality of forage maize under different nitrogen management practices. Agronomy Journal 85: 341-347.
  10. Delcatilho, P., Chardon, W.J., and Salomons, W. 1993. Influence of cattle-manure slurry application on the solubility of cadmium, copper, and zinc in a manured acidic, loamy-sand soil. Journal of Environmental Quality 22(4): 689- 697.
  11. Eteng, E., Asawalam, D., and Ano, A. 2014. Effects of Cu and Zn on maize (Zea mays L.) yield and nutrient uptake in coastal plain sand derived soils of southeastern Nigeria. Journal of Soil Science 4(25): 235-245.
  12. Ghushchi, A., Jurablu, A., Silespur, M., and Hadi, H. 2010. Effect of tillage and crop residue management on soil characteristics and forage corn. Journal of Agroecology 2(3): 428-436. (In Persian with English Summary)
  13. Ghasemi, A., Ghasemi, M., and Ghanbari, A. 2006. The effect of different amounts of manure and chemical mixtures on the quality and uptake of nitrogen in forage maize. Iranian Crop Science Congress, Tehran, Iran (In Persian)
  14. Hosseini, M., Haghnia, G., Emami, H., and Lakzian, A. 2010. Effectiveness of different barley residue management on microbial biomass carbon indices, organic carbon and total nitrogen in the soil. Journal of Agroecology 2(3): 372-382. (In Persian with English Summary)
  15. Jacson, M.L. 1962. Soil Chemical Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall, Inc. 498 pp.
  16. Khamdi, F., Msgrbashy, M., Hassibi, P., Farzaneh, M., and Enayati, N. 2017. The effect of plant residues and level of macro nutrients on yield and yield components of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Journal of Agroecology 8(4): 536-550. (In Persian with English Summary)
  17. Majidian, M., Ghalavand, A., Kamkarhaghighi, A., and Karimian, N. 2008. The use of organic fertilizers and their effects on reducing drought stress, quantitative and qualitative of maize. The 3rd National Congress of Recycling and using Renewable Organic Resources in Agriculture, Isfahan, Iran. (In Persian)
  18. Modirshanechi, M. 2010. The production and management of forage plants. Astan Quds Razavi Press, Mashhad, Iran 448 pp. (In Persian)
  19. Momeni, A., Bahmanyar, M.A., and Pirdashti, H. 2014. Effect of different application of green manures, animal and biological fertilizers on dynamics of N in the soil, leaves and maize. Journal of Agroecology 6(3): 595-606. (In Persian with English Summary)
  20. Murphy, J., and Riley, J.P. 1962. A modified single solution for determination of phosphate in natural water. Analysis Chimical Acta 27: 35-36.
  21. Nisani, S., Fallah, S., and Raiesi, F. 2012. The effect of poultry manure and urea on agronomic characters of forage maize under drought stress condition. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production 21(4): 63-74.
  22. Office of breeding and improvement of poultry production, bees and silkworms. 2004. Department of Livestock Ministry of Agriculture, Tehran, Iran. (In Persian)
  23. Pimentel, D. 1993. Economics and energies of organic and conventional farming. Journal of Agricultural Ethics 6: 53-60.
  24. Polshekanepahlevan, M., Movahedinaieni, A., and Keikha, G. 2007. Effect of different planting methods and different amounts of irrigation on grain growth and yield. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources 4(5): 1-10. (In Persian with English Summary)
  25. Pourazizi, M., Fallah, S., and Iranipour, R. 2013. Effect of different nitrogen sources and rates on dry matter and uptake of primary macronutrients in forage sorghum. Electronic Journal Crop Production 6(2): 185-202. (In Persian with English Summary)
  26. Peyman, N., Fred, S., and Golbabaie, A. 2011. The use of green manure with mung bean cultivation in rotation with wheat. Specialized Scientific Journal of Agriculture of Zeitun 31(222): 3-7. (In Persian)
  27. Rai, J., Bagheri, A., and Eshaghi Sardrood, N. 2013. The effect of chemical and bio fertilizers on yield of sorghum Speedfeed cultivar in different cutting. Journal of Agroecology 5(3): 231-242. (In Persian with English Summary)
  28. Ramrudi, M., Majnunehussein, N., Mazaheri, D., and Hossein-Zadeh, A. 2010. The effect of cover crops, tillage systems and nitrogen fertilization on yield of forage sorghum. Journal of Crop Science 3(4): 769-763. (In Persian with English Summary)
  29. Rezainejad, Y., and Afuni, M. 2000. Effect of organic matter on soil chemical properties, nutrient uptake and maize yield. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources 4: 19-27. (In Persian with English Summary)
  30. Rezvantalab, N., Pirdshti, H., Bahmanyar, M., and Abbasi, A. 2008. Study some of yield and yield component of corn Zea mays L. to different types and rates of organic and chemical fertilizers. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources 15(5): 1-10. (In Persian with English Summary)
  31. Rodney, K., Heitschmid, T., and Jerry, W.S. 1991. Grazing Management an Ecological Perspective, Timber Press Oregon, USA 259 pp.
  32. Qin, R., Stamp, P., and Richner, W. 2006. Impact of tillage on maize rooting in a Cambisol and Luvisol in Switzerland. Soil and Tillage Research 85(1-2): 50-61.
  33. Saha, S., Chakraborty, D., Sharma, A.R., and Kalra, N. 2010. Effect of tillage and residue management on soil physical-Indian mustard system. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science 80(8): 679-685.
  34. Talgre, L., Lauringson, E., Roostalu, H., and Astover, A. 2009. The effects of green manures on yields and yield quality of spring wheat. Agronomy Research 7(1): 125-132.
  35. Tavasoli, A., Ghanbari, A., and Mousavinick, M. 2010. Effect of organic and chemical fertilizers on quantitative and qualitative characteristics of millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) and red beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Intercropping. Crop Ecophysiology 15(4): 1-16. (In Persian with English Summary)
  36. Tiscareno-Lopez, M., Baez-Gonzales, A.D., Vehazquez-Valle, M., Potter, K.N., Stone, J.J., Tapia-Vargas, M., and Claveran-Alonso, R. 1999. Agricultural research for watershed restoration in Central Mexico. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 54: 686-692.
  37. Waniyo, U.U., Sauwa, M.M., Ngala, A.L., Abubakr, G.A., and Anelo, E.C. 2013. Influence of sources and rates of manure on yield and nutrient uptake of maize (Zea mays L.) in Maiduguri, Nigeria, Nigerian Journal of Basic and Applied Science 21(4): 259-265.
  38. Zolfeghari, D. 2014. Effects of green manure on forage maize production under different agronomy management. Master Thesis of Zabol University, Zabol, Iran. (In Persian with English Summary)