فراتحلیل مصرف کود شیمیایی نیتروژن در تولید غلات در ایران

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه زراعت و اصلاح نباتات، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران

2 گروه اگروتکنولوژی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران

چکیده

پژوهش‌های مربوط به ارزیابی تأثیر کودهای نیتروژنه بر عملکرد غلات سابقه‌ای طولانی در کشور دارد، با این حال به دلیل پراکندگی و اختلاف موجود در نتایج آزمایشات مختلف، دستیابی به نتیجه‌گیری کلّی دشوار می‌باشد. در این مطالعه جهت غلبه بر این مشکل از رهیافت فراتحلیل استفاده شده‌است تا از این طریق بتوان با تلفیق و آنالیز مجدد یافته‌های آزمایشات مستقل به نتیجه‌ای واحد دست یافت. به این منظور 46 مقاله علمی- پژوهشی منتشر شده توسط محققین کشور در ارتباط با اثر کودهای نیتروژنه بر عملکرد غلات شامل 23 مقاله مربوط به گندم (Triticum aestivum L.)، 14 مقاله مربوط به ذرت (Zea mays L.) و 9 مقاله در مورد برنج (Oryza sativa L.) مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. سطوح کودهای نیتروژنه به‌کار رفته در آزمایشات برای گندم، ذرت و برنج به ترتیب در دامنه250-20، 275-25 و 90-10کیلوگرم در هکتار قرار داشت. تلفیق یافته‌ها نشان داد که با مصرف کودهای نیتروژنه میانگین عملکرد دانه در گندم 2477، در ذرت 4699 و در برنج 1509 کیلوگرم در هکتار نسبت به تیمار شاهد افزایش یافت. نتایج فراتحلیل نشان داد که در هر سه محصول تحت بررسی تأثیر کودهای نیتروژنه بر افزایش عملکرد دانه و ماده خشک معنی‌دار ولی بر شاخص برداشت بی‌معنی بود و بر این اساس حداکثر عملکرد دانه با مصرف 100-50 و حداکثر عملکرد ماده خشک با کاربرد 150-100 کیلوگرم در هکتار نیتروژن حاصل شد. سطوح کودی بالاتر تأثیر معنی‌داری بر افزایش عملکرد نداشتند. فراتحلیل به‌صورت جداگانه برای هر محصول نیز اجرا شد. نتایج نشان داد که در گندم حد بهینه نیتروژن کودی برای عملکرد دانه و ماده خشک به‌ترتیب 100-75 و 100 کیلوگرم در هکتار می‌باشد در حالی‌که برای ذرت حداکثر عملکرد دانه با مصرف 100-50 و حداکثر عملکرد ماده خشک در 150 کیلوگرم در هکتار نیتروژن خالص حاصل می‌شود و در برنج عملکرد دانه و ماده خشک با مصرف 90-75 کیلوگرم نیتروژن در هکتار به حداکثر خواهد رسید. شاخص برداشت هیچ‌یک از سه محصول پاسخ معنی-داری به کود نیتروژنی نداشت.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

A Meta Analysis on Nitrogen Fertilizer Experiments on Cereal Crops in Iran

نویسندگان [English]

  • AliReza Koocheki 1
  • Mahdi Nassiri Mahallati 1
  • Sara Bakhshaie 2
  • Agrin Davari 1
1 Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran
2 Department of Agrotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction
Though chemical fertilizers increase crop production; their overuse has hardened the soil, decreased fertility, strengthened pesticides, polluted air and water, and released greenhouse gases, thereby bringing hazards to human health and environment as well. Using of chemical fertilizer in agriculture has a history of more than fifty years in Iran. Recently, nitrogen fertilizers consume more than 61 percent of the chemical fertilizer in our country. Globally, the role of chemical fertilizers especially nitrogen fertilizers in agricultural production has been widely studied over the past 50 years, and in our country a considerable amount of research in universities has been dedicated to studying in this field. Meta-analysis is a method for analyzing the results of various studies on a subject. In fact, meta-analysis is a type of research on other research to re-examine the various studies carried out on a particular topic, compare them statistically and, using specific statistical techniques, the results of all those studies combine into a single result. Experiments on the effects of nitrogen fertilizers on cereals yield have a long history in Iran. However, because of high variation in the results, a final conclusion is not readily achieved.

Materials and methods
In this study, the researches of the effect of different levels of nitrogen fertilizers on yield and yield components of cereals (wheat, corn and rice) over the past 20 years have been investigated. These studies included a variety of scientific-research articles. So, 46 papers were selected and the information was extracted from them. To overcome such a difficulty meta-analysis was used to combine and re-analyze the data of independent experiments. For this, 46 published papers related to nitrogen application on cereals including 23, 14 and 9 papers, respectively on wheat, corn and rice were selected based on criteria to satisfy the required data for meta-analysis. Fertilizer application rates for wheat, corn and rice varied in the range of 20-250, 25-275 and 10-90 kg.ha-1 N, respectively.

Results and discussion
About 86% of the experiments used treatments between 25 and 150 kg.ha-1 nitrogen, and the frequency of nitrogen levels above 200 kg.ha-1 was very low in corn experiments. In the case of wheat, the range of nitrogen levels in the experiments was between 20 and 250 kg.ha-1. In rice, the range of nitrogen uptake was far more limited than wheat and corn, it is between 10 and 90 kg ha-1. On average in all nitrogen levels, grain yield of wheat, corn and rice compared to control were increased by 2477, 4699 and 1509 kg.ha-1, respectively. Meta-analysis results showed that nitrogen fertilizers significantly increased both grain yield and Biological yield of the studied cereals. However, harvest index was not statistically affected. Maximum grain and biological yields were attained by 50-100 and 100-150 kg.ha-1 N, respectively. Meta-analysis was also conducted for each crop separately. The results indicated that optimal nitrogen levels for the grain and biological yields were 75-100 and 100 kg.ha-1 N except corn. For corn maximum amount could be achieved from 50-100 kg.ha-1 N for grain yield and from 50-100 kg.ha-1 N for biological yield. For rice, maximum of grain and biological yields were reported by 75-90 kg.ha-1 N. The studied cereals harvest index showed no significant response to nitrogen fertilizers.


Conclusion
The results of this study showed that despite the long history of using this inputs in the agricultural sector, the optimal use is still unclear. In this study, statistical comparisons between fertilizer levels were performed, while the ecological dimensions of nitrogen application were also significant. Further studies can compare types of efficacy, soil health and environmental aspects of nitrogen use and other chemical fertilizers, provide a wider range of possibilities for sustainable field management and sustainable management of the country.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • corn
  • grain yield
  • Harvest index
  • Rice
  • wheat
Austin, R.B., Bringham, J., Blackwell, R.D., Evans, L.T., Ford, M.A., Morgan, C.L., and Taylor, M. 1998. Genetic improvement in winter wheat yield since 1980 and associated physiological changes. Journal of Agricultural Science 84: 675.
Bahrani, A., and Tahmasebi Sarvestani, Z. 2006. Effects of rate and time of nitrogen fertilizer on yield, yield component, and dry matter remobilization efficiency in two winter wheat cultivars. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences Islamic Azad University 12(2): 369-376. (In Persian with English Summary)
Cassman, K.G., Dobermann, A., and Walters, D.T. 2002. Agroecosystems, nitrogen-use efficiency, and nitrogen management. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment 31(2): 132-140.
Cerrato, M.E., and Blackmer, A.M. 1990 Comparison of models for describing; corn yield response to nitrogen fertilizer. Agronomy Journal 82: 138-143.
Dobermann, D.I., and Cassman, K.G. 2004. Plant nutrient management for enhanced productivity in intensive grain production of United States and Asia. Plant and Soil 247: 153-175.
Emam, Y., Ahmadi, A., and Pesarak-li, M. 2005. Effect of different methods of cultivation with residue management and nitrogen levels on wheat yield and yield component in Fars province conditions. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science 41(4): 841-850. (In Persian with English Summary)
FAO. 2010. Fertilizer Requirements in 2015 and 2030. Food and Agriculture Organization on the United Nations, Rome.
Good, A.G., Sherawat, A.K., and Muench, D.G. 2004. Can less yield more? Is reducing nutrient input into the environment compatible with maintaining crop production? Trends in Plant Science 9: 597-605.
Gurevitch, J., and Hedges, L.V. 1999. Statistical issues in ecological meta-analyses. Ecology 80: 1142-1149.
Gurevitch, J., Morrow, L.L., Wallace, A., and Walsh, J.S. 1992. A meta-analysis of competition in field experiments. The American Naturalist 140(4): 539-572.
Hedges, L.V., Gurevitch, J., and Curtis, P.S. 1999. The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology. Ecology 80: 1150-1156.
Hosseini, R., Galeshi, S., Soltani, A., and Kalateh, M. 2011. The effect of nitrogen on yield and yield component in modern and old wheat cultivars. Iranian Society of Agronomy and plant Breeding Sciences 4(1): 187-199. (In Persian with English Summary)
Kazemi Poshtmassari, H., Pirdashti, H.A., Bahmanyar, M.A., and Nassiri, M. 2006. Study the effects of nitrogen fertilizer rates and split application on yield and yield components of different rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars. Pajouhesh and Sazandegi 20(1): 68-78. (In Persian with English Summary)
Kiaer, L.P., Skovgaard, M., and Østergard, H. 2009. Grain yield increase in cereal variety mixtures: A meta-analysis of field trials. Field Crop Research 114: 361-373.
Kiniry, J.R, Bean, B., Xie, U., and Chen, P. 2004. Maize yield potential: critical processes and simulation modeling in a high-yielding environment. Agricultural Systems 82: 45-56.
Koocheki, A., Nassiri Mahallati, M., Moradi, R., and Alizade, Y. 2011. Meta-analysis of agro biodiversity in Iran. Journal of Agroecology 1(2): 1-16. (In Persian with English Summary)
Liao, C.Z., Peng, R.H., Luo, Y.Q., Zhou, X.H., Wu, X.W., Fang, C.M., Chen, J.K., and Li, B. 2008. Altered ecosystem carbon and nitrogen cycles by plant invasion: a metaanalysis. New Phytologist 177: 706–714.
Lu, M., Zhou, X., Luo, Y., Yang, Y., Fang, C., Chen, J., and Li, B. 2001. Minor stimulation of soil carbon storage by nitrogen addition: A meta-analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 140: 234-244.
Luo, Y.Q., Hui, D.F., and Zhang, D.Q. 2006. Elevated CO2 stimulates net accumulations of carbon and nitrogen in land ecosystems: a meta-analysis. Ecology 87: 53-63.
Miran Zadeh, H., and Emam, Y. 2010. The effect of nitrogen and Cloro-macovat-clorid on seed yield, dry matter and water efficiency on 4 cultivars of wheat. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 8(6): 636-645. (In Persian with English Summary)
Nahvi, M., Allahgholipour, M., Ghorbanpour, M., and Mehrgan, H. 2005. The effective of planting density and nitrogenous fertilizer rate for GRH1 rice hybrid. Pajouhesh and Sazandegi 66: 33-38. (In Persian with English Summary)
Naroki, F.A., Vaezi, B., and Bavi, V. 2009. Determination amount of advisable nitrogen for improving quantity and quality characters of three new durum wheat lines. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences 41(3): 583-595. (In Persian with English Summary)
Nelson, L.A., Voss, R.D., and Pesek, J.T. 1985. Agronomic and Statistical Evaluation of Fertilizer Response. P. 53-90. In: O.P. Engelstad (Ed.) Fertilizer Technology and Use. 3rd ed. ASA, Madison.
Peng, S., Laza, R., Visperas, R., Sanico, A., Cassman, K.G., and Khush, G. 2000. Grain yield of rice cultivars and lines developed in the Philippines since 1966. Crop Science 40: 307-314.
Piotto, D. 2008. A meta-analysis comparing tree growth in monocultures and mixed plantations. Forest Ecology and Management 255: 781-786.
Rahimi Zadeh, M., Zarea Feizabdi, A., and Kashani, A. 2011. Effect of before planting, nitrogen fertilizer and returning crop residue on wheat growth and yield. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 9(2): 211-221. (In Persian with English Summary)
Rosenberg, M.S., Adams, D.C., and Gurevitch, J. 2000. MetaWin: statistical software for meta-analysis. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
Rotundo, J.L. and Westgate, M.E. 2009. Meta-analysis of environmental effects on soybean seed composition. Field Crops Research 110: 147-156.
Shahsavari, N., and Saffari, M. 2005. The effect of different levels of nitrogen on the function and elements of the varieties of wheat in Kerman. Pajouhesh and Sazandegi 66(4): 82-87. (In Persian with English Summary)
Singh, U. 2005. Integrated nitrogen fertilization for intensive and sustainable agriculture. Journal of Crop Improvement 15: 259-287.
Statistics of Agriculture. 2011. Available at: www.maj.ir
Teimoorian, M., Galavi, M., Pirdashti, H., and Nasiri, M. 2009. Yield and yield components of three rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars in response to source-sink limitations and different nitrogen fertilizer. Journal of Plant Production 16(3): 49-65.
Tonnito, C., David, M.B., and Drinkwater, L.E. 2006. Replacing bare fallows with cover crops in fertilizer-intensive cropping systems: A meta-analysis of crop yield and dynamics. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 112: 58-72.
Valkama, E., Risto, U., Ylivainio, K., Virkajarvi, P., and Turtola, E. 2009. Phosphorus fertilization: A meta-analysis of 80 years of research in Finland. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 130: 75-85.
Yua, Y., Huang, Y., and Zhang, W. 2012. Changes in rice yields in China since 1980 associated with cultivar improvement, climate and crop management. Field Crops Research 136: 65-75.
Zhang, W., and Zhang, X. 2007. A forecast analysis on fertilizer consumption worldwide. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 133: 427-434.
CAPTCHA Image