Study of Effective Factors for the Protection of Rice(Oryza sativa) Crop Diversity to Provide Security, Food, and Sustainable Households in Bandar Anzali, Guilan Province

Document Type : Research Article


Research Institute of Environmental Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Tehran, Iran.


It is estimated that by 2050, the world's population will increase by 30 to 35 percent, so about 60 percent growth in agricultural production must be achieved for proper nutrition. Food security refers to a situation in which people at all times, physically, socially, and economically, have access to adequate, safe, and nutritious food that meets their nutritional needs and preferences for an active and healthy life. One of the most important challenges of the 21st century to improve food security is the preservation of agricultural biodiversity. Biodiversity is a key factor in ensuring that adequate food is available at any given scale and is often assessed in terms of genetic composition as well as their stability locally. Conventional single-crop farming systems depend on a small number of high-yield crops and their expansion, in addition to environmental problems, led to significant reductions in plant biodiversity. There are different approaches to addressing food security and biodiversity protection concerns. This study aimed to investigate food security and effective factors in the protection of agricultural biodiversity to ensure sustainable food security.
Materials and Methods
This research has been performed in Anzali port. The present study is applied in terms of purpose and descriptive-analytical method. This study was conducted in two stages: 1. Food security status: information required for research through library and documentary studies (detailed results of the country's census and village identity) and part of it through field studies (observation, interview, and questionnaire). In this regard, in the first stage, a questionnaire related to food security indicators such as food adequacy, health, nutrition, and availability to have an active and healthy life was used. Randomly selected and a total of 90 households in the city were interviewed. 2. Study of the role of agriculture. Biodiversity Conservation Indicators in Ensuring Sustainable Food Security, 100 farm managers were surveyed in 10 villages, and the questions were divided into 5 groups: economic, social, educational, infrastructure, and organizational. Finally, SPSS software and Pearson correlation were used to plot the chart and statistical analysis.
Results and Discussion
The city has food adequacy, access to food, and healthy activity, which is about 8 hours a day, but in terms of healthy living away from disease, nutrition, and having a healthy food free of chemical inputs, is poor. Improving food security is especially important for developing countries where social, political, cultural, and economic developments can improve food security. The government should adopt policies such as global cash food subsidies to improve food security, direct support for low-income households, and allocate subsidies based on the geographical location of these households. Our results show that even in a city, the relationship between socio-economic factors and caloric intake can vary from region to region. Thus, if governments choose specific policies (for example, education policies), they should target provinces where food security is negatively correlated with calorie intake. Simple income-raising policies are not always an effective way to improve calorie intake in rural areas. Relevant and private government institutions should focus on other socio-economic factors and prioritize them in improving calorie intake in the family and improving health outcomes. In all villages except the exempt village, infrastructure factors have the greatest impact on maintaining biodiversity, and in the exempt village, economic factors have the greatest impact. The highest standard deviation is seen in the infrastructure factors related to the villages of Torbegodeh, Talebabad, ShilehSar, Khomeyran, Ashpala, Abkenar, and Kapurchal. The most standard deviation in other villages is related to economic factors. In Torbegodeh and Rudpasht villages, the importance of educational factors, Talebabad, Shileh Sar, and Kapurchal villages, the importance of social factors, Khomeyran, Maaf, and Ashpala villages, the importance of infrastructure factors, and Abkenar village, environmental factors are more.
In general, in this region, rice fields with high inputs of resources and low crop diversity and environmental impacts can lead to environmental feedback in different areas, for example, reducing biodiversity and soil fertility, which is more dependent on the base. Fossil fuel inputs for robust production stability. To this end, focusing on the production of agricultural products for domestic consumption to increase food security by supporting rural livelihoods and the production of environmentally sustainable food should be a priority.


Main Subjects

  1. Aghsaei, H., Dinan, N.M., Moridi, A., Asadolahi, Z., Delavar, M., Fohrer, N., & Wagner, P.D. (2020). Effects of dynamic land use/land cover change on water resources and sediment yield in the Anzali wetland catchment, Gilan, Iran. Science of the Total Environment712, 136449.
  2. Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Fisheries Department. (2014). The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
  3. Akbarzadeh, E. (2022). Director of Agriculture of Guilan Agricultural Jihad Organization, Transplantation of 98% of rice fields in Gilan, 233 thousand hectares out of 238 thousand hectares of rice fields in Gilan have been planted.
  4. Akudugu, M. A. (2012). Estimation of the determinants of credit demand by farmers and supply by rural banks in Ghana’s Upper East Region. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development2(393-2016-23992), 189-200. DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.197959.
  5. Ayenew, Y.A., Wurzinger, M., Tegegne, A., & Zollitsch, W. (2011). Socioeconomic characteristics of urban and peri-urban dairy production systems in the North Western Ethiopian highlands. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 43(6), 1145-1152.
  6. Bogin, B., Azcorra, H., Wilson, H.J., Vázquez-Vázquez, A., Avila-Escalante, M.L., Varela-Silva, I., & Castillo-Burguete, M.T. (2014). Globalization and children’s diets: The case of Maya of Mexico and Central America. AnthropologicAl review, 77(1), 11-32.
  7. Burlingame, B., & Dernini, S. (2012). Sustainable diets and biodiversity directions and solutions for policy, research, and action. FAO Headquarters, Rome. URI:
  8. Chen, Z., Yang, J., & Xie, Z. (2005). Economic development of local communities and biodiversity conservation: A case study from Shennongjia National Nature Reserve, China. Biodiversity and Conservation, 14(9), 2095-2108. doi:
  9. Chowdhury, R.B., Moore, G.A., Weatherley, A.J., & Arora, M. (2017). Key sustainability challenges for the global phosphorus resource, their implications for global food security, and options for mitigation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 945-963.
  10. Coates, J., Swindale, A., & Bilinsky, P. (2007). Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS) for measurement of food access: Indicator guide: Version 3.
  11. Connor, M., & San, S.S. (2021). Sustainable rice farming and its impact on rural women in Myanmar. Development in Practice, 31(1), 49-58.
  12. Connor, M., Quilloy, R., de Guia, A.H., & Singleton, G. (2022). Sustainable rice production in Myanmar impacts food security and livelihood changes. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 20(1), 88-102.
  13. D’Souza, A., & Mishra, A.K. (2018). Adoption and abandonment of partial conservation technologies in developing economies: The case of South Asia. Land Use Policy, 70, 212-223.
  14. Dou, Z., Toth, J.D., & Westendorf, M.L., (2018). Food waste for livestock feeding: Feasibility, safety, and sustainability implications. Global Food Security, 17, 154-161.
  15. Erb, K.H., Lauk, C., Kastner, T., Mayer, A., Theurl, M.C., & Haberl, H. (2016). Exploring the biophysical option space for feeding the world without deforestation. Nature Communications, 7(1), 1-9.
  16. Fanzo, J., (2015). Ethical issues for human nutrition in the context of global food security and sustainable development. Global Food Security, 7, 15-23. Doi:
  17. Ferranti, P., (2016). Food sustainability, security, and effects of global change. Journal of Food Security.
  18. Fischer, E. F. (2014). The good life: Aspiration, dignity, and the anthropology of wellbeing. Stanford University Press.
  19. Folberth, C., Khabarov, N., Balkovič, J., Skalský, R., Visconti, P., Ciais, P. & Obersteiner, M. (2020). The global cropland-sparing potential of high-yield farming. Nature Sustainability, 3(4), 281-289.
  20. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), and the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). 2014. The state of food insecurity in the world 2014. Strengthening the enabling environment for food security and nutrition. food system. Food Security, 13(4), 819-847.
  21. Foresight, U.K., (2011). The Future of Food and Farming. Final Project Report. The Government Office for Science, London.
  22. Gaiha, R., Jha, R., & Kulkarni, V.S. (2010). Diets, nutrition, and poverty: the Indian experience. Available at SSRN 1734590.
  23. Garibaldi, L.A., Gemmill-Herren, B., D’Annolfo, R., Graeub, B.E., Cunningham, S.A., & Breeze, T.D. (2017). Farming approaches for greater biodiversity, livelihoods, and food security. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 32(1), 68-80.
  24. Godfray, H.C.J., Beddington, J.R., Crute, I.R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J.F., & Toulmin, C. (2010). Food security: The challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science, 327(5967), 812-818.
  25. Golmohammadi, M.J., Mohammaddoust Chamanabad, H.R., Yaghoubi, B., & Oveisi, M. (2018). Rice weed community composition and richness in northern Iran: A temperate rainy area. Appllication. Ecollogy. Environment. Res, 16(4), 4605-4617.
  26. Henchion, M., McCarthy, M., Resconi, V.C., & Troy, D. (2014). Meat consumption: Trends and quality matters. Meat Science, 98(3), 561-568.
  27. Jifroudi, S., Teimoury, E., & Barzinpour, F. (2020). Designing and planning a rice supply chain: A case study for Iran farmlands. Decision Science Letters, 9(2), 163-180.
  28. Johnston, J.L., Fanzo, J.C., & Cogill, B. (2014). Understanding sustainable diets: A descriptive analysis of the determinants and processes that influence diets and their impact on health, food security, and environmental sustainability. Advances in Nutrition, 5(4), 418-429.
  29. Jones, A.D. (2017). On-farm crop species richness is associated with household diet diversity and quality in subsistence-and market-oriented farming households in Malawi. The Journal of Nutrition, 147(1), 86-96.
  30. Karimi, F.A. (2019). Director general of the office of cereals and basic products of the deputy minister of agriculture of the ministry of agriculture, Production of 2.6 million tons of white rice in 2019. Kian, M.R., Koochek, A., Nassiri Mahallati, M., & Zareh Feiz Abadi, A. (2020). Long-term evaluation of crops agronomic density using crop density index in Iran crops production. Journal of Agroecology, 12(1), 55-69. doi: 22067/jag.v12i1.74695
  31. Kiani, B. H., Kayani, W. K., Khayam, A. U., Dilshad, E., Ismail, H., & Mirza, B. (2020). Artemisinin and its derivatives: A promising cancer therapy. Molecular Biology Reports47, 6321-6336.
  32. Kraehmer, H., Jabran, K., Mennan, H., & Chauhan, B.S. (2016). Global distribution of rice weeds–A review. Crop Protection, 80, 73-86.
  33. Lal, B., Gautam, P., Raja, R., Nayak, A.K., Shahid, M., Tripathi, R., & Panda, B.B. (2014). Weed community composition after 43 years of long-term fertilization in tropical rice–rice system. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 197, 301-308.
  34. Lathuillière, M.J., Johnson, M.S., Galford, G.L., & Couto, E.G. (2014). Environmental footprints show China and Europe’s evolving resource appropriation for soybean production in Mato Grosso, Brazil. Environmental Research Letters, 9(7), 074001. Doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/9/7/074001.
  35. Machovina, B., Feeley, K.J., & Ripple, W.J., (2015). Biodiversity conservation: The key is reducing meat consumption. Science of the Total Environment, 536, 419-431.
  36. Mango, N., Makate, C., Mapemba, L., & Sopo, M. (2018). The role of crop diversification in improving household food security in central Malawi. Agriculture and Food Security, 7(1), 1-10.
  37. Mango, N., Zamasiya, B., Makate, C., Nyikahadzoi, K., & Siziba, S. (2014_. Factors influencing household food security among smallholder farmers in the Mudzi district of Zimbabwe. Development Southern Africa, 31(4), 625-640.
  38. Mishra, V., Aaadhar, S., Shah, H., Kumar, R., Pattanaik, D. R., & Tiwari, A. D. (2018). The Kerala flood of 2018: combined impact of extreme rainfall and reservoir storage.
  39. Mohr, A., Beuchelt, T., Schneider, R., & Virchow, D. (2016). Food security criteria for voluntary biomass sustainability standards and certifications. Biomass and Bioenergy, 89, 133-145.
  40. Montenegro de Wit, M. (2016). Are we losing diversity? Navigating ecological, political, and epistemic dimensions of agrobiodiversity conservation. Agriculture and Human Values, 33(3), 625-640. Doi:
  41. Montenegro de Wit, M. (2019). Beating the bounds: How does ‘open source become a seed commons?. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 46(1), 44-79.
  42. Nan, M., Lun, Y., Qingwen, M., Keyu, B., & Wenhua, L. (2021). The significance of traditional culture for agricultural biodiversity—Experiences from GIAHS. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 12(4), 453-461.
  43. Nicholson, C.F., Kopainsky, B., Stephens, E.C., Parsons, D., Jones, A.D., Garrett, J., & Phillips, E.L., (2020). Conceptual frameworks linking agriculture and food security. Nature Food, 1(9), 541-551. Doi:
  44. Olney, D.K., Pedehombga, A., Ruel, M.T., & Dillon, A. (2015). A 2-year integrated agriculture and nutrition and health behavior change communication program targeted women in Burkina Faso to reduce anemia, wasting, and diarrhea in children 3–12.9 months of age at baseline: A cluster-randomized controlled trial. The Journal of Nutrition, 145(6), 1317-1324.
  45. Pachapur, P.K., Pachapur, V.L., Brar, S.K., Galvez, R., Le Bihan, Y., & Surampalli, R.Y. (2020). Food security and sustainability. Sustainability: Fundamentals and Applications, 357-374.
  46. Parfitt, J., Barthel, M., & Macnaughton, S. (2010). Food waste within food supply chains: Quantification and potential for change to 2050. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences, 365(1554), 3065-3081.
  47. Power, A.G. (2010). Ecosystem services and agriculture: Tradeoffs and synergies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences, 365(1554), 2959-2971.
  48. Raneri, J.E., Padulosi, S.T.E.F.A.N.O., Meldrum, G.E. N.N.I.F.E.R., & King, O.I. (2019). Promoting neglected and underutilized species to boost nutrition in LMICs.
  49. Salau, S.A., Yusuf, O.J., Apata, D.F., & Adesina, O.M. (2017). A binary logit estimation of factors influencing awareness about grasscutter farming among rural and sub-urban households in Kwara state, Nigeria. World, 5(6), 299-304. doi:10.12691/wjar-5-6-3
  50. Schipanski, M.E., MacDonald, G.K., Rosenzweig, S., Chappell, M.J., Bennett, E.M., Kerr, R.B. & Schnarr, C., (2016). Realizing resilient food systems. BioScience, 66(7), 600-610.
  51. Singleton, G., Labios, R., Min, A., Htwe, N.M., Oo, T.L., Win, S.S., & Kyaw, M.A. (2019). Diversification and intensification of rice-based cropping systems in lower Myanmar (My Rice). Australian Government, Australian Center for International Agricultural Research.
  52. Speelman, E.N., Groot, J.C., García-Barrios, L.E., Kok, K., van Keulen, H., & Tittonell, P. (2014). From coping to adaptation to economic and institutional change–trajectories of change in land-use management and social organization in a Biosphere Reserve community, Mexico. Land Use Policy, 41, 31-44.
  53. Stehfest, E., Bouwman, L., Van Vuuren, D.P., Den Elzen, M.G., Eickhout, B., & Kabat, P. (2009). Climate benefits of changing diet. Climatic Change, 95(1), 83-102.
  54. Teklay, A., Dile, Y.T., Setegn, S.G., Demissie, S.S., and Asfaw, D.H., 2019. Evaluation of static and dynamic land use data for watershed hydrologic process simulation: A case study in Gummara watershed, Ethiopia. Catena, 172, 65-75.
  55. Tscharntke, T., Clough, Y., Wanger, T.C., Jackson, L., Matzke, I., Perfecto, I., & Whitbread, A. (2012). Global food security, biodiversity conservation, and the future of agricultural intensification. Biological Conservation, 151(1), 53-59.
  56. Van der Merwe, J.D., Cloete, P.C., & Van der Hoeven, M. (2016). Promoting food security through indigenous and traditional food crops. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 40(8), 830-847.
  57. Vogliano, C., Raneri, J. E., Coad, J., Tutua, S., Wham, C., Lachat, C., & Burlingame, B. (2021). Dietary agrobiodiversity for improved nutrition and health outcomes within a transitioning indigenous Solomon Island food system. Food Security13(4), 819-847.
  58. Vogliano, C., Raneri, J.E., Coad, J., Tutua, S., Wham, C., Lachat, C., & Burlingame, B. (2021). Dietary agrobiodiversity for improved nutrition and health outcomes within a transitioning indigenous Solomon Island
  59. Wehmeyer, H., de Guia, A.H., & Connor, M. (2020). Reduction of fertilizer use in South China—impacts and implications on smallholder rice farmers. Sustainability, 12(6), 2240.
  60. Wittman, H., Chappell, M.J., Abson, D.J., Kerr, R.B., Blesh, J., Hanspach, J., & Fischer, J. (2017). A social-ecological perspective on harmonizing food security and biodiversity conservation. Regional Environmental Change, 17(5), 1291-1301.
  61. Yu, G., Feng, J., Che, Y., Lin, X., Hu, L., & Yang, S. (2010). The identification and assessment of ecological risks for land consolidation based on the anticipation of ecosystem stabilization: A case study in Hubei province, China. Land Use Policy, 27(2), 293-303.
  62. Zimmerer, K.S., de Haan, S., Jones, A.D., Creed-Kanashiro, H., Tello, M., Carrasco, M., & Olivencia, Y.J. (2019). The biodiversity of food and agriculture (Agrobiodiversity) in the Anthropocene: Research advances and conceptual framework. Anthropocene, 25, 100192.


Volume 15, Issue 3 - Serial Number 57
September 2023
Pages 585-605
  • Receive Date: 11 March 2022
  • Revise Date: 02 July 2022
  • Accept Date: 19 July 2022
  • First Publish Date: 19 July 2022