ارزیابی عملکرد کمی و کیفی نخود (Cicer arietinum L.) و جو (Hordeum vulgare L.) در کشت مخلوط تحت تأثیر کودهای زیستی و شیمیایی در شرایط آبیاری تکمیلی

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه زراعت، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه ارومیه، ایران

2 بخش تحقیقات زراعی و باغی مرکز تحقیقات خراسان رضوی، سازمان تحقیقات آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی مشهد، ایران

چکیده

این آزمایش به­منظور بررسی مقایسه الگوهای مختلف کشت مخلوط ردیفی نخود (Cicer arietinum L.) و جو (Hordeum vulgare L.) تحت تأثیر کودهای زیستی و شیمیایی، به صورت فاکتوریل در قالب طرح بلوک­های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار و 24 تیمار در مزرعه­ای واقع در آذربایجان غربی- شهرستان نقده در سال زراعی 1393- 1392 به اجرا در آمد. عامل اول شش نوع الگوی کاشت شامل کشت خالص نخود، کشت خالص جو، کشت مخلوط 1 ردیف جو+ 1 ردیف نخود، 2 ردیف جو+ 2 ردیف نخود، 4ردیف جو+ 2ردیف نخود و 2 ردیف جو+ 4 ردیف نخود و عامل دوم چهار سطح کود شامل عدم کاربرد کود (شاهد)، 100% کود شیمیایی (NP) ،کود زیستی (ازتو بارور 1+ فسفاته بارور 2) و 50% کود شیمیایی+ کود زیستی بود. نتایج در مورد گیاه نخود نشان داد که بیشترین عمکرد دانه از کشت خالص با 75/220 گرم در متر مربع و کمترین عملکرد دانه با میانگین 91/78 گرم در متر مربع مربوط به الگوی کشت یک ردیف جو+ یک ردیف نخود بود. بین تیمارهای کودی مورد استفاده بیشترین عملکرد دانه و بیولوژیک نخود از تیمار تلفیقی کود شیمیایی+ کود زیستی و کمترین عملکرد از تیمار عدم مصرف کود به­دست آمد. نتایج نشان داد که بیشترین عمکرد دانه جو (12/414 گرم در متر مربع) از کشت خالص و کمترین عملکرد دانه (66/206 گرم در متر مربع) مربوط به الگوی کشت یک ردیف جو+ یک ردیف نخود بود. در بررسی تیمارهای کودی بیشترین و کمترین عملکرد دانه و بیولوژیک به ترتیب از تیمار تلفیقی کود شیمیایی+ کود زیستی و شاهد به­دست آمد. کشت مخلوط 2 ردیف جو+ 2 ردیف نخود در شرایط کاربرد کود شیمیایی بیشترین (34/1) میزان نسبت برابری زمین کل را در بین الگوهای مختلف کشت مخلوط به خود اختصاص داد که معادل 34 درصد افزایش در بهره­وری استفاده از زمین نسبت به کشت خالص دو گونه بود با توجه به اهداف کشاورزی پایدار با هدف حذف یا کاهش قابل ملاحظه مصرف نهاده­های شیمیایی، تیمار عدم کاربرد کود و کود دهی تلفیقی برای نسبت 2 ردیف جو+ 2 ردیف نخود مناسب و قابل توجیه است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation of quantitative and qualitative yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) in intercropping affected by biological and chemical fertilizers in supplemental irrigation condition

نویسندگان [English]

  • Esmaeil Rezaei-Chiyaneh 1
  • Yahia Rasouli 1
  • Jalal Jalilian 1
  • Masoud Ghodsi 2
1 Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Urmia University, Iran
2 Agricultural and Horticultural Research Department of Khorasan Razavi Research Center, Mashhad Agricultural Education and Extension Research Organization, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction
Intercropping as a method of sustainable agriculture is defined as the simultaneous growing of two or more crops during the same season on the same area of land. Intercropping compared with monoculture has many advantages including the more efficient use of resources (water, nitrogen, and radiation), enhances yield quality, prevention of soil erosion, and reduced incidence of insects, diseases, and weeds. Javanmard et al. (2012) studied the agronomical, ecological and economic evaluation of wheat- chickpea intercropping under rainfed condition of Maragheh reported that the highest pods number per plant, seed number per plant, seed yield of chickpea and spikelet number per spike, grain number per spike, grain yield, protein content, and protein yield were obtained in the sole crops. This research aimed to study the effects of different fertilizers (biological, chemical, integrative) and intercropping of barley with chickpea on their yield and qualitative traits.
Materials and methods
This study was carried out with a factorial design based on Randomized Complete Block Design with three replications and 24 treatments in Naqadeh, Iran during the growing season of 2014-2015. The first factor included six intercropping patterns consist of 1-row chickpea + 1-row barley, 2-row chickpea + 2-row barley, 4-row chickpea + 2-row barley and 2-row chickpea + 4-row barley and monocropping of each crop and the second factor was included control (no fertilizer), 100% chemical fertilizers (NP), biofertilizers and biofertilizers +50% chemical fertilizers.
Barley was harvested when spike turned brown and chickpea was harvested when the first pod of the plants fully matured. Field data were collected by cutting 10 plants randomly from each plot and yield component of each plant was considered as the average for each plot.
Analysis of variance had been done by using SAS 9.4 software was performed for studied parameters. Means were compared with LSD at 5% probability level (P < 0.05).
 Results and discussion
Results showed that intercropping patterns had a significant effect on all of the mentioned traits except the number of seeds per pod of chickpea pea. There was no significant interaction effect between intercropping pattern and fertilizer. The maximum and the minimum grain yield and biological yield of chickpea were obtained at monocropping and row intercropping (1-row chickpea + 1-row barley), respectively. In addition, the highest and the lowest grain yield and biological yield of barley were obtained from monocropping and 1-row chickpea + 1-row barley, respectively. Also, the effect of fertilizer was significant on all traits of both crops. The highest seed yield and biological yield of chickpea were achieved in the combined usage of fertilizers with 104.60 and 339.53 g.m-2 and the maximum grain yield and biological yield of barley were obtained in use of integrated application fertilizers with 215.90 and 1187.53 g.m-2, respectively. The highest and the lowest grain protein of barley and chickpea were obtained in the combined usage of fertilizers and control (no fertilizer), respectively.
 Calculation of LER revealed that the maximum LER (1.34) was obtained for intercropping (2-row of barley + 2-row of chickpea) with biochemical fertilizer, respectively. This means that intercropping improved land use efficiency by 34%, compared with monocropping.
Conclusion
According to the results of this experiment, the highest grain yield for both plants (chickpeas and barley) were achieved in monocropping. However, the lowest grain yield of chickpeas and barley were obtained in intercropping patterns with ratios of 1:1, respectively. The higher grain yield of mono-cropped may be due to the fewer disturbances in the habitat in a homogeneous environment under monocropping systems. In the condition of application biofertilizer, more nutrient accessibility led to an improvement in the yield of chickpeas and barley. Results indicated that application of biofertilizers enhanced the grain and yield components. Among treatments, the combined usage of fertilizers (%50 chemical fertilizers+ biofertilizer) showed a greater increase in studied traits than individual consumption. The positive effect of biofertilizer may result from its ability to improve the availability of nitrogen, phosphorus and other nutrients especially under limited irrigation of the soil which causes decreasing on the nutrient's availability.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Azotobacter
  • Land equivalent ratio
  • Planting pattern
  • Pseudomonas
  • Sustainable agriculture

مراجع

Amraei, B., Ardakani, M.R., Rafiei, M., Paknejad, F., and Rejali, F. 2017. Effect of Mycorrhizal symbiosis and Azotobacter application on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) qualitative traits under dry condition of Khorramabad. Journal of Agroecology 3(9): 722-733. (In Persian with English Summary)
Bakheit, B.R., and Glala, A.Y. 2002. Intercropping fababean with some legumes crops for control (Orobanch crenata L.). Acta Agronomica Hungarica 50: 1-60.
Borghi, E., Crusciol, C.A.C., Nascente, A.S., Sousa, V.V., Martins, P.O., Mateus, G.P., and Costa, C. 2013. Sorghum grain yield, forage biomass production and revenue as affected by intercropping time. European Journal of Agronomy 51: 130-139.
Chapagain, T., and Riseman, A. 2014. Barley–pea intercropping: Effects on land productivity, carbon and nitrogen transformations. Journal of Field Crops Research 166: 18-25.
Daraei Mofrad, A.R., Azizi, K., Heidari, S., and Ahmadi, A.R. 2008. Evaluating the effects of mono- and intercropping of barley with narbon vetch on barley grain yield and weeds growth. Magazine of Daneshvar 1: 35-44. (In Persian)
Gholinezhad, E., and Rezaei-Chiyaneh, E. 2014. Evaluation of grain yield of black cumin (Nigella sativa L.) in intercropping whit chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Iranian Journal of Sciences 16: 236-249. (In Persian with English Summary)
Hamzei, J., and Seyedi, M. 2013. Evaluation of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) intercropping systems using advantageous indices of intercropping under weed interference conditions. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 5: 1-12.
Hamzei, J., and Seyedi, M. 2015. Study of canopy growth indices in mono and intercropping of chickpea and barley under weed competition. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production 24(4.1): 75-90. (In Persian with English Summary)
Hauggaard-Nielsen, H., Gooding, M., Ambus, P., Corre-Hellou, G., Crozat, Y., Dahlmann, C., Dibet, A., VonFragstein, P., Pristeri, A., Monti, M., and Jensen, E. S. 2009. Pea–barley intercropping for efficient symbioticN2-fixation, soil N acquisition and use of other nutrients in European organic cropping systems. Journal of Field Crops Research 113: 64-71.
Inanloofar, M., Omidi, H., and Pazoki, A. 2013. Morphological, agronomical changes and oil content in purslane (Portulaca oleracea L.) under drought stress and biological/chemical fertilizer of nitrogen. Journal of Medicinal Plants 4: 170-184.
Jahan, M., and Nassiri Mahallati, M. 2012. Soil fertility and biofertilizers. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Press P: 250.
Jahan, M., Aryaee, M., Amiri, M.B., and Ehyaee, H.R. 2013. The effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on quantitative and qualitative characteristics of Sesamum indicum L. with application of cover crops of Lathyrus sp. and Persian clover (Trifolium resopinatum L.). Agronomy Journal 1: 1-15. (In Farsi with English Summary)
Jalali, A.H. 2005. Problems and solutions to optimize nitrogen fixation in soybean. Zeitun 162: 25-29. (In Persian)
Javanmard, A., Rostami, A., Nouraein, M., and Gharekhani, Gh. 2016. Agronomical, ecological and economical evaluation of wheat- chickpea intercropping under rainfed condition of Maragheh. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production 26 (1): 19-37. (In Persian with English Summary)
Koocheki, A., Fallahpour, F., Khorramdel, S., and L. Jafari. 2014a. Intercropping wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) with canola (Brassica napus L.) and their effects on yield, yield components, weed density and diversity. Journal of Agroecology 1: 11-20. (In Persian with English Summary)
Koocheki, A., Nasiri Mahallati, M., Borumand Rezazadeh, Z., Jahani. M., and Jafari, L. 2014b. Yield responses of black cumin (Nigella sativa L.) to intercropping with chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and bean (Phaseoluse vulgaris L.). Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 12(1): 1-8 (In Persian with English Summary)
Lafond, G.P. 1994. Effects of row spacing, seeding rate and nitrogen on yield of barley and wheat under zero- till management. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 74: 703-711.
Mahdavi Maraj, T., Ghanbari, A., and Asghari Pour, M.R. 2015. Intercropping of barley and ajwain under different of manure and chemical fertilizers. Journal of Applied Research of Plant Ecophysiology 1: 63-78. (In Persian with English Summary)
Majnoun Hosseini, N. 2008. Grain Legume Production. Tehran, Iran. (In Persian)
Mardani, F., Balouchi, H.R., Yadavi, A., and Salehi, A. 2015. Effect of row intercropping patterns on yield, yield components, and weed control of fenugreek (Trigonella foenumgreacum L.) and anise (Pimpinella aanisum L.). Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 3: 626-636.
Mashhadi, T., Nakhzari Moghaddam, A., and Sabouri, H. 2015. Investigation of competition indices in intercropping of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under nitrogen consumption. Journal of Agroecology 3: 344-355. (In Persian with English Summary)
Mirzakhani1, M., and Davari, M.R. 2017. The Effect of inoculation with Azotobacter and nitrogen levels on grain and corn (Zea mays L.) yield components at simultaneous cropping system with legumes. Journal of Agroecology 9: 63-75. (In Persian with English Summary)
Mohammadi, S., Khalil Agdam, N., Khoshnejad, A., Pour Yousef, M., and Jalilnejad, N. 2013. Mixed-cropping and its effects on yield and agronomical traits of barley (Hordeum vulgar L.) and bersim clover (Trifolium alexanderium L.). Journal of Crop Ecophysiology 7: 229-239. (In Persian with English Summary)
Namvar, A., and Khandan, T. 2013. Response of wheat to mineral nitrogen fertilizer and biofertilizer (Azotobacter sp. and Azospirillum sp.) inoculation under different levels of weed interference. Journal of Ekologija 2: 85-94.
Naseri, R., and Mirzaei, A. 2010. Response of yield and yield components of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) to seed inoculation with Azotobacter and Azospirillum and different nitrogen levels under dry land condition. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences 9: 445-449.
Nazeri, P., Kashani, A., Khavazi, K., Ardakani, M. R., Mirakhori, M., and Pour Siah Bidi, M. 2010. The effect of biofertilizer and phosphorus fertilizer banding with Zinc on white bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Agronomy Journal 2: 175-185. (In Farsi with English Summary)
Neugschwandtner, R., and Kaul, P.H. 2014. Sowing ratio and N fertilization affect yield and yield components ofoat and pea in intercrops. Journal of Field Crops Research 155: 159-163.
Piri, I., Zendehdel, B., and Tavassoli, A. 2017. Study of Agronomical and ecological parameters of additive and replacement intercropping systems of corn (Zea maize L.) and soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.). Journal of Agroecology 9(1): 705-721. (In Persian with English Summary)
Pouramir, F., Koocheki, A., Nasiri Mahalati, M., and Ghorbani, R. 2010. Evaluation of yield and yield components of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) and chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in intercropping of replacement method. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 8(5): 747-757. (In Persian with English Summary)
Prin, S.U., and Dwit, J. 2005. Intercropping cereal and grain legumes, A Farmers Perspective, Research at the Louis Bolk inStitute live Stock Department W.W.W.agric.nsw.gov.au.
Rezaei- Chiyaneh, E. 2017. Intercropping of flax Seed (Linum usitatissimum L.) and pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under foliar application of iron nano chelated and zinc. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production 29: 39-56. (In Persian with English Summary)
Rezaei-Chiyaneh, E., and Gholinezhad, E. 2015. Agronomic characteristics of intercropping of additive series of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and black cumin (Nigella sativa L.). Journal of Agroecology 7: 381-396. (In Persian with English Summary)
Rezaei-Chiyaneh, E., Tajbakhsh, M., and Fotohi Chiyaneh, S. 2015. Yield and yield components of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) in strip intercropping with ajowan (Carum copticum L.) influenced by bio and chemical fertilizer. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production 24: 1-15. (In Persian with English Summary)
Sengul, S. 2003. Performance of some forage grasses or legumes and their mixtures under dry land condition. European Journal of Agronomy 19: 401-409.
Sing, S., and Kapoor, K.K. 1998. Inoculation whit phosphate solubilizing microorganisms and a vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus improves dry matter yield and nutrient uptake by wheat grown in a sandy soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils 28: 139-44.
Sobkowicz, P. 2006. Competition between triticale and field beans in additive intercrops. Plant and Soil Environment 52: 42-54.
Soleimani Fard, A., Naseri Rad, H., Naseri, R., and Piri, E. 2013. Effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on phenological traits, grain yield and yield components of three maize (Zea mays L.) cultivars. Journal of Crop Ecophysiologhy 7(1): 71-90. (In Farsi with English Summary)
Sujatha, M.G., Lingaraju, B.S., Palled, Y.B., and Ashalath, K.V. 2008. Importance of integrated nutrient management practices in maize under rain fed condition. Journal Agriculture Sciences 21: 334-338.
Tavakoli, M., and Jalali, A.H. 2016. Effect of different biofertilizers and nitrogen fertilizer levels on yield and yield components of wheat. Journal of Crop Production and Processing 6(21): 33-45. (In Persian with English Summary)
Thorsted, M.D., Olesen, J.E., and Weiner, S. 2006. Width of clover strips and wheat rows influence grain yield in winter wheat/white clover intercropping. Journal of Field Crops Research 95: 280-290.
Tohidinia, M.A., Mazaheri, D., Bagher-Hosseini, S.M., and Madani, H. 2014. Effect of biofertilizer Barvar-2 and chemical phosphorus fertilizer application on kernel yield components of maize (Zea mays cv. Sc704). Iranian Journal of Crops Sciences 15: 295-307. (In Persian with English Summary)
Tuna, C., and Orak, A. 2007. The role of intercropping on yield potential of common vetch/oat cultivated in pure stand and mixtures. Journal of Agriculture Biological Science 2: 14-19.
Undie, U.L., Uwah, D.F., and Attoe, E.E. 2012. Effect of intercropping and crop arrangement on yield and productivity of late season maize/soybean mixtures in the humid environment of South Southern Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Science 4: 37-50.
Valizadegan, A. 2015. Study of yield quality and quantity in pot marigold (Calendula officinalis L.) and chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and species diversity and relative abundance of insects in row and strip intercropping. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production 25(3): 15-30. (In Persian with English Summary)
Yang, F., Huang, S., Gao, R., Liu, W., Yong, T., Wang, X., Wu, X., and Yang, W. 2014. Growth of soybean seedling in relay strip intercropping systems in relation to light quantity and red: far- red ratio. Journal of Field Crops Research 155: 245-253.
Yousef Nia, M., Banayan Aval, M., and Khorramdel, S. 2015. Evaluation of radiation use and interception of fenugreek (Trigonella foenumgraecum L.) and dill (Anethum graveolens L.) intercropping canopy. Journal of Agroecology 7: 381-396. (In Persian with English Summary)
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله
CAPTCHA Image

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 05 اسفند 1396
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 05 اسفند 1396
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار: 01 فروردین 1398

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار