تأثیرکاشت گیاهان پوششی بر توزیع عمودی سطح برگ و ماده خشک سویا (Glycine max L.) در رقابت با علف‌های هرز

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی ساری

2 دانشگاه کشاورزی ومنابع طبیعی ساری

3 اکولوژی گیاهان زراعی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

چکیده

به منظور مطالعه تغییرات عمودی سطح برگ و ماده خشک کانوپی سویا (Glycine max L.) در رقابت با علف‌های‌هرز و در حضور گیاهان پوششی، آزمایشی در مزرعه تحقیقاتی دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی ساری در سال 1392 به صورت بلوک کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار اجرا شد. تیمار‌های آزمایشی شامل گیاهان پوششی (شبدر ایرانی (Trifolium resupinatum L.)، شنبلیله (Trigonella foenum–graecum L.) ، خلر (Lathyrus sativus L.) و ماشک (Vicia sativa L.)) و زمان‌های کاشت گیاهان پوششی (همزمان با سویا و سه هفته بعد از کاشت سویا) بوده و همچنین دو تیمار شاهد به صورت تک‌کشتی سویا با و بدون وجین در نظر گرفته شد. نتایج نشان داد حداکثر میزان شاخص سطح برگ و تجمع ماده خشک سویا در لایه‌های مختلف کانوپی بسته به نوع گیاه پوششی و زمان کاشت آن متفاوت بود در حالی‌که گیاهان پوششی در کاشت با تأخیر شاخص سطح برگ و ماده خشک کمتری نسبت به کاشت همزمان داشتند. در اکثر موارد بیشترین شاخص سطح برگ و همچنین تجمع ماده خشک علف‌های‌هرز در لایه ابتدایی کانوپی (20-0 سانتی‌متر) به دست آمد. بیشترین مجموع سطح برگ علف‌هرز در تیمار کاشت همزمان سویا با شنبلیله (4/290 سانتی‌متر مربع) و بیشترین ماده خشک مجموع علف‌هرز در تیمار کاشت سویای بدون وجین (4/12 گرم بر بوته) مشاهده شد، در حالی‌که کمترین مجموع سطح برگ و ماده خشک کل علف‌هرز (به ترتیب صفر سانتی‌متر مربع و صفر گرم بر بوته) در تیمار کاشت با تأخیر ماشک به‌ دست آمد، همچنین کاشت با تأخیر ماشک موجب تولید بیشترین عملکرد دانه سویا (6/3792 کیلوگرم در هکتار) در شرایط حضور علف‌هرز شد که بیشترین توانایی سرکوب‌کنندگی رشد علف‌های‌هرز را نسبت به سایر گیاهان پوششی داشته است. به نظر می‌رسد کاشت ماشک گل‌خوشه‌ای 21 روز بعد از سویا برای سرکوب کردن علف‌های‌هرز جایگزین مناسبی در کشاورزی پایدار باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Effect of Cover Crops on Vertical Distribution of Leaf Area and Dry Matter of Soybean (Glycine max L.) in Competition with Weeds

نویسندگان [English]

  • seyyedeh samaneh hashemi 1
  • Faezeh Zaefarian 2
  • Esfandiar Farahmandfar 1
  • Milad Bagheri Shirvan 3
1 Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University
2 Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University
3 Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
چکیده [English]

Introduction
Amount and vertical distribution of leaf area are essential for estimating interception and utilization of solar radiation of crop canopies and, consequently dry matter accumulation (Valentinuz & Tollenaar, 2006). Vertical distribution of leaf area is leaf areas per horizontal layers, based on height (Boedhram et al., 2001). Above-ground biomass is one of the central traits in functional plant ecology and growth analysis. It is a key parameter in many allometric relationships (Niklas & Enquist, 2002). The vertical biomass distribution is considered to be the main determinant of competitive strength in plant species. The presence of weeds intensifies competition for light, with the effect being determined by plant height, position of the branches, and location of the maximum leaf area. So, this experiment was conducted to study the vertical distribution of leaf area and dry matter of soybean canopy in competition with weeds and cover crops.
Materials and methods
This experiment was performed based on complete randomized block design with 3 replications in center of Agriculture of Joybar in 2013. Soybean was considered as main crop and soybean and Persian clover (Trifolium resupinatum L.), fenugreek (Trigonella foenum–graecum L.), chickling pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) and winter vetch (Vicia sativa L.) were the cover crops. Treatments were included cover crops (Persian clover, fenugreek, chickling pea and winter vetch) and cover crop planting times (simultaneous planting of soybean with cover crops and planting cover crops three weeks after planting of soybeans) and also monoculture of soybeans both in weedy and weed free conditions were considered as controls. Soybean planted in 50 cm row spacing with 5 cm between plants in the same row. Each plot was included 5 rows soybeans. Cover crop inter-seeded simultaneously in the main crop. Crops were planted on 19 May 2013 for simultaneous planting of soybean. The dominant weed species were green foxtail (Setaria viridis L.), foxtail grass (Alopecurus myosuroides Huds), and red root pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) in the experimental field. The other weed was considered as the others. At the soybean canopy closure stage, a vertical card board frame marked in 20-cm increments was used in the field as a guide to cut standing plants including soybean, cover crops and weeds. In each vertical layer of canopy, leaves and stem samples were separated. The leaf area both crops and weeds were measured with a leaf area meter LICOR-3000A (LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA). Stem and leaf samples oven dried.
Results and discussion
The results showed that the maximum leaf area and dry matter of soybean was varied in different layers of canopy depending on the type of cover crop and cover crop planting time, while delaying in planting of cover crop causes lower leaf area and dry matter than the plants were planted at the same time with soybean. In most cases, the maximum leaf area index and dry matter accumulation of weeds were obtained in primary layer (0-20 cm). The maximum weed leaf area (290.4 cm2) was observed in simultaneous planting of soybean with fenugreek and maximum of total weed dry matter (12.4 g.plant-1) was observed in soybean without weeding, while the minimum of weed total leaf area and total weed dry matter (0 cm2 and 0 g.plant-1, respectively) was achieved in planting of winter vetch after 21 days of soybean planting. Also delayed planting of winter vetch produced the maximum grain yield (3792.6 kg.ha-1) of soybean in weedy plots, where it had the greatest weed suppressive ability than other cover crops.
Conclusion
Winter vetch can suppress weed with competition and allelopathic mechanism, so we can conclude that winter vetch planting21 days after soybean planting is suitable replacement for weed suppression in sustainable agriculture.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Canopy structure
  • Chickling pea
  • Persian clover
  • Winter vetch
Abdali Mashhadi, A. 1999. Intercropping, effect of sustainable agriculture (part one). Zeitun Journal 137:13-17 (In Persian)
Abdin, O.A., Zhou, X.M., Cloutier, D., Coulman, D.C., Faris, M.A., and Smith, D.L. 2000. Cover crops and interrow tillage for weed control in short season maize (Zea mays). European Journal of Agronomy 12: 93-102.
Ahmadvand, G., Nassiri Mahallati, M., and Koocheki, A. 2006. Effect of light competition and nitrogen fertilizer on canopy structure of wheat and wild oat. Journal of Agricultural Science and Environmental Resources 12(6): 100-112. (In Persian with English Summary)
Ateh, C.M., and Doll, J.D. 1996. Spring-planted winter rye (Secale cereale) as a living mulch to control weed in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technology 10: 347- 353.
Banman, D.T. 2001. Competitive suppression of weeds in a leek-celery intercropping system. PhD thesis. Wageningen Agricultural University. The Netherlands.
Brainard, D.C., Bellinder, R.R., and Ditommaso, A. 2005. Effects of canopy shade on the morphology, phenology, and seed characteristics of Powell amaranth (Amaranthus powellii). Weed Science 53: 175-186.
Campiglia, E., Mancinelli, R., Radicetti, E., and Caporali, F. 2010. Effect of cover crops and mulches on weed control and nitrogen fertilization in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Crop Production 29: 354-363.
Caton, B.P., Mortimer, A.M., Foin, T.C., Hill, J.E., Gibson, K.D., and Fischerà, A.J. 2001. Weed shoot morphology effects on competitiveness for light in direct-seeded rice. Weed Research 41: 155-163.
Cavero, J., Zaragoza, C., Bastiaans, L., Suso, M.L., and Pardo, A. 2000. The relevance of morphological plasticity in the simulation of competition between maize and Datura stramonium. Weed Research 40: 146-180.
DeHaan, R.L., Wyse, D.L., Ehlke, N.J., Maxwell, B.D., and Putnam, D.H. 1994. Simulation of spring- seeded smother plants for weed control in corn (Zea mays). Weed Science 42: 35-43.
Dadashi, F. 2013. Soybean and wheat cover crops affects on weed control of corn under different fertilizer sources. MSc thesis. Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Iran. (In Persian with English Summary)
Ghafari, M., Ahmadvand, G., Ardakani, M.R., Nadali, I., and Elahipanah, F. 2011. Effect of cover crops of rye, barley and rapeseed in two planting density on biomass, density and biodiversity of winter weeds. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology 3(1): 1-8. (In Persian with English Summary)
Haj Seyed Hadi, M., Nour Mohammadi, G., Nassiri Mahallati, M., Rahimiyan, H., and Zand, E. 2007. Vertical distribution of dry matter and leaf area of potato in competition with weeds. Agricultural New Results 1(4): 293-307. (In Persian with English Summary)
Hamzei, J., Seyedi, M., and Babaei, M. 2016. Competitive ability of lentil (Lens culinaris L.) cultivars to weed interference under rain-fed conditions. Journal of Agroecology 8(1): 82-94. (In Persian with English Summary)
Hollander, N.G., Bastiaans, L., and Kropff, M.J. 2007. Clover as a cover crop for weed suppression in an intercropping design, I. Characteristics of several clover species. European Journal of Agronomy 26: 92-103.
Moechnig, M.J., Boerboom, C.M., Stoltenberg, D.E., and Binning, L.K. 2003. Growth interactions in communities of common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album), giant foxtail (Setari faberi) and corn. Weed Science 51: 363-370.
Mosier, D.G., and Oliver, L.R. 1995. Common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) and entireleaf morning glory (Ipomoea hederacea var. integriuscula) interference on soybeans (Glycin max). Weed Science 43: 239-246.
Ngouajio, M., Giffen, M.E., and Hutchinson, C.M. 2003. Effect of cover crop and management system on weed population in lettuce. Crop Protection 22: 57-64.
Rajcan, I., AghaAlikhani, M., Swanton, C.J., and Tollenaar, M. 2002. Development of redroot pigweed is influenced by light spectral quality and quantity. Crop Science 42: 1930-1936.
Rajcan, I., and Swanton, C.I. 2001. Understanding maize-weed competition: Resource competition, light quality and whole plant. Field Crop Research 71: 139-150.
Ramroudi, M., Mazaheri, D., Majnoun Hoseini, N., Hoseinzadeh, A., and Hoseini, S.M.B. 2010. Effect of cover crops, tillage systems and nitrogen fertilizer on yield of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.). Iranian Journal of Crop Science 41(4): 763-769. (In Persian with English Summary)
Rao, V.S. 2006. Principles of weed science. Science Publication, USA. 555 pp.
Safahani Langerodi, A., Aynehband, A., Zand, E., Nour-Mohammadi, G., Baghestani, M.A., and Kamkar, B. 2008. Evaluation of competitive ability in some canola (Brassica napus) cultivars with wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis) and relationship with canopy structure. Journal of Agriculture Science and Natural Resources 15(2): 86-98. (In Persian with English Summary)
Sanjani, S., Bagher Hosseini, S.M.B., Chaichi, M.R., and Rezvan Beidokhti, S.H. 2006. Effect of additive intercropping sorghum: Cowpea on weed biomass and density in limited irrigation system. Journal of Field Crop Research 7(1): 85-95. (In Persian with English Summary)
Schittenhelm, S., Sourell, H., and Lopmeier, F.J. 2006. Drought resistance of potato cultivars with contrastingcanopy architecture. European Journal of Agronomy 24: 193-202.
Spitters, C.J.T., and Vandenberg, J.P. 1982. Competition Between Crop and Weeds: A system approach. In: Holzner, W. and N. (Eds.), Numata Biology and Ecology of Weeds Dr. W. Junk Publication, The hague.
Tackenberg, O. 2007. A new method for nondestructive Tsuda, M. 1999. Errors in leaf area measurement with an automatic area meter due to leaf chlorophyll in crop plants. Annals of Botany 84: 799-801.
Uchino, H., Iwama, K., Jitsuyama, Y., Ichiyama, K., Sugiura, E., Yudate, T., Nakamura, S., and Gopal, J. 2012. Effect of interseeding cover crops and fertilization on weed suppression organic and rotational cropping system, 1. Stability of weed suppression over years and main crops of potato, maize and soybean. Field Crop Research 127: 9-16.
Uchino, H., Iwama, K., Jitsuyama, Y., Yudate, T., and Nakamura, S. 2009. Yield losses of soybean and maize by competition with interseeded cover crops and weeds in organic-based cropping systems. Field Crops Research 113: 342-351.
Valentinuz, O.R., and Tolennar, M. 2006. Effect of genotype, nitrogen, plant density, and row spacing on the area-per-leaf profile in maize. Agronomy Journal 98: 94-99.
Vazin, F., Madani, A., and Hassanzadeh, M. 2010. Modeling light interception and distribution in mixed canopy of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) in competition with corn (Zean mays). Notulae Botanicae Horticulture Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 38(3): 128-134.
White, H.D., and Mc Cain, K.W. 1989. Bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 24: 119-186.
Zaefarian, F. 2009. Ecophysiological response of corn and soybean intercropping to simultaneous competition of red root pig weed and jimson weed. PhD dissertation. Tarbiat Modarres University, Iran. (In Persian with English Summary)