ارزیابی تحمل به شوری تاج خروس (Amaranthus retrofelexus L.) در مرحله سبز شدن و گیاهچه ای تحت شرایط کنترل شده

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی



شوری از تنش‌های محیطی است که بر جوانه زنی، استقرار و رشد گیاهان تأثیر می‌گذارد. تعیین آستانه تحمل گیاه در شرایط تنش شوری برای سبز شدن و استقرار گیاهچه‌ها کمک زیادی در انتخاب خاک و آب آبیاری در کشت گیاهان هالوفیت می‌کند، به این منظور برای ارزیابی واکنش گیاه تاج خروس به تنش شوری و همچنین تعیین آستانه این گیاه در شرایط تنش شوری، آزمایشی در قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با پنج تیمار و چهار تکرار در دو مرحله در اتاقک رشد اجراء شد. در مرحله اول سطح شوری صفر ، 10، 20،30 و 40 دسی زیمنس بر متر مورد مطالعه قرار گرفت. در این مرحله بذور تنها در سطوح شوری صفر و 10 دسی زیمنس بر متر قادر به سبز شدن بودند وبه ترتیب در صد سبز شدن بذور 90 و57 درصد بود. در مرحله دوم برای تعیین دقیق آستانه تحمل به شوری در این گیاه حد فاصل شوری 10 و 20 دسی زیمنس بر متر 12، 14، 16 و 18 مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. در این مرحله تا غلظت 14دسی زیمنس بر متر بذور قادر به سبز شدن بودند اما طول گیاهچه، وزن تر و خشک اندام هوایی و درصد ماده خشک کاهش یافت. بر اساس نتایج حاصله، آستانه سبز شدن گیاه تاج خروس در شرایط تنش شوری غلظت 14 دسی زیمنس بر متر تعیین گردید.


عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation of salinity tolerance at emergence and seedling stages of Amaranthus retrofelexus L. under control environmental

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohsen Zaferanieh
  • Jafar Valizadeh
  • S. Masoud Ziaie
  • Majid Jafari
  • Mahboubeh Mohseni
چکیده [English]

Salinity is one of the environmental factors that have a critical influence on the plant emergence and plant growth and establishment. The determination of salinity tolerance threshold is a useful criterion to choose soil and irrigation water for cultivation of halophytes. In order to determine salinity tolerance threshold in Amaranthus retrofelexus, an experiment was performed in greenhouse based on a complete randomized block design with four replications in two stages. In first stage, the experiment was performed with salinity levels of 0, 10, 20, 30 and 40 dsm-1 and emergence percentage in salinity levels of 0 and 10 dsm-1 was 90 and 57%, respectively. In order to determine the full – scale of salinity tolerance threshold Amaranthus retrofelexus, the second experiment was conducted. At this second stages, treatment were different levels of salinity equal to 10, 12, 14, 16 and 18 dsm-1 NaCl. Amaranthus retrofelexus seedling were able to emerge up to the salinity of 14 dsm-1 NaCl. Generally, with increasing the levels of salinity, the seedling emergence percentage was decreased. According to result, salinity tolerance threshold for seedling emergence and performance of Amaranthus retrofelexus under controlled condition was 14 dsm-1

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Tolerance threshold
  • Emergence percentage
  • Halophyte
Bruria H, Arie, N. 1998;physiological response of potato plants to soil salinity and water deficit , plant sci. 137: 43-
2- Flower, T.J. and Yeo, A. R. 1995;Breeding for salinity resistancce in crop plants, Aust. J. plant physiol, 22: 875-
3- Francis G., Jhon L., Jifon S., Micaela C., James P.S.2002;Gas exchange , Chlorophyll and nutrient contents in
relation to NA and CL accumulation in "sunburst" mandarin grafted on different root stocks, plant sci. 35: 314-320.
4- Grieve, C. M., S. Lesch, L. E. Francois., and E. W. Maas. 1992. Anolysis of main-spike yield components in saltstressed
wheat. Crop Sci. 32:697-703.
5- Gulzar, S., Khan, M.A., 2001.Seed germination of a halophytic grass Aehuropus lagopoides. Ann. Bot. 87: 319-
6- Guzman, M. and J. Olave, 2004. Effects of N- form and saline priming on germination and vegetative growth of
Galia-type melon (cucumis melol. Cv . primal) under salinity Acta hort (ISHS). 659: 253-260.
7- Hillel, d. 2002. Salinity Management for Sustainable Irrigation: Integrating Science, Enironment. And Economics.
World Bank Publications
8- Irma T., Jolan C. Gabriella S; Ferenc H; Attila P;Gabriella K; Agnes S; Margit s; Laszlo. E. 2002; Acclimation of
tomato plants to salinity stress after a salicylic acid pre- treatment. Proceeding of the 7th Hungarian congress on
plant physiol. S2-02.
9- Johnson, B., and T. Henderson. 2002. water use pattems of grain amaranth in the North em Great plains. Agron. J.
94: 1437-1443.
10- Kafi. M., Jami AL-Ahmadi, M., 2006. Salinity effect on germination properties of kochia scorparia. Asian J.Plant
Sci. 5:71-75
11- Katembe, W.J., Unger, I.A., 1998. Effect of sallinty on germination and seedling growth of two Artiplex spcies
(chenopodiaceae) . Ann. Bot. 82: 167-175.
12- Kaya, M.D., Ipek, A., Oztork, H., 2003. Effect of different soil salinty levels on germination and seedling growth
of safflower. Turk. J.Agric. For. 27,221-227.
13- Khan,M.A., Unger, I.A., 2001. Seed germination of Triglochin maritime as influenced by sailinty and dormancy
releving compounds. Biol. Plant. 44:301-303.
14- Lauer, J., P . Carter, T. Wood, G. Diezel, and M.Mlynarek. 1999 . corn hubrid response to planting data in northem
cornbelt. Agron, J. 91: 834-839.
15- Mohammad B., Jean-Merie k., Stanley L. 1998; salt stress effects on roots and leaves of atriplex halimus L. and
their corresponding callus cultures, plant sci. 137: 131-142.
16- Munns, R., 2002. Comrarative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant, cell and Environ. 25:239-250
17- Nezami, A., J. Nabati, M. Kafi, M. Mohseni. 2009. Evalution of salinity tolerance at seedling stages of Amaranthus
retrofelexus under control environment. Environmental Stresses in Agricultural Sciences. 1:69-77
18- Prabijot, K.G., Arun D.S.,Prabhjeet S.,Singh B.2001;Effect of various abiotic steress on the grown in light and
darkness. Bulg. J, plant physiol.27: 72-84.
19- Putnam, D., E. Oplinger, J. Doll, and E. Schulte. 1989 .Amaranth. Alternative field crops manual. Electronic
version issue. Unir. Wisconsin, Extention service, Madison, WI.
20- Rastegar, M.A. 2000. Dry land agriculture. Publishment of Tehran University.Iran
21- Rastegar, M.A. 2007. Weeds plant. Publishment of Tehran University.Iran
22- Serraj, r., Sincliar, T.R., 2002. Osmolyte accumulation: can it really help increase crop yield under drought
condition . Plant cell environ. 25:333-341.
23- Sleugh, B., K. Moore, E. Brummer, A. Knapp, J. Rvssell, and L. Gibson. 2001 .Forage nutritive value of various
amaranth species at different dates crop sci. 41: 466-472.
24- Stordahl, J., C. Sheaffer, and A. Dicostanzo. 1999 . variety and maturity affect amaranth forage yield and quality. J.
Production Agric. 12: 249 253.
25- Werner, J.E., Finkelestin, R.R., 1995. Arabidosis mutants with reduced response to NaCl and osmotic stress.
Physiol. Plantarum. 93:659- 666
26- Williams, J., and D. Brenner. 1995 . Grain Amaranth. P. 129-186.
27- Williams(Ed.). cereal and pseudocereal. Chapman & hall, London.
28- Zhifang G., Sagi M., lips S. H. 1998. Carbohydrate Metabolism in leaves and assimilate partitioning in fruits of
tomato (Lycopersicon esculantum L.) as effected by salinity, plant Sci. 135:149-159.