Assessment of Agroecosystem Health in Eastern Provinces of Iran

Document Type : Scientific - Research

Authors

• Hoda Mohammadi
• Alireza Koocheki
• Mehdi Nassiri Mahallati
• Mohsen Jahan

Department of Agrotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.

10.22067/jag.v11i3.47264

Abstract

Introduction
The conventional agricultural ecosystems (agroecosystems) are the complex systems which in order to produce the higher amount of food, fiber, feed and fuel have been significantly manipulated. Rapid growth of world population and demand for agricultural products resulted in higher pressure on agroecosystems. In recent decades achieving to maximum production was the main goal of conventional agriculture. In order to increase yield on production usually these agroecosystems need to external inputs such as chemical fertilizers and pesticides which have the negative effects on human health and also environment.  Sustainable and healthy agroecosystems are based on profitable farms that use fewer external inputs, integrate animal and plant production where appropriate, maintain a higher biotic diversity, emphasize eco friendly technologies that are appropriate to the scale of production, and efficiently use the renewable forms of energy. For example diversifying the farm with several crops or using appropriate rotation helps to reduce the risk of biotic and abiotic stresses. The complex nature of agroecosystem implies that any evaluation of agroecosystem health must consider the dynamics of multiple components. The current paper presents an applied method to evaluate agroecosystem health using a number of main indicators.
 Materials and Methods
In order to study the agroecosystem health in four eastern provinces of Iran (i.e. Sistan and Baluchestan, South khorasan, Razavi Khorasan and North Khorasan) during 2002-2011 the current survey was conducted. The required data and information obtained from statistical database and also questionnaires. For each year the total value of agroecosystem health calculated using 29 different indexes. Different indexes calculated based on their scientific definitions. For example property distribution index calculated by dividing the total area of agricultural lands on number of farmer in each city. Because of different nature of selected indexes and also wide range of them, in order to facilitate comparison all of the calculated indexes normalized using the equation (1), in this equation Xnorm is the normalized value of each index, Xmax and Xmin are the highest and lowest value of X, respectively.
Equation (1):
 
Results and Discussion
Based on results the highest value of structural health was calculated for Sistan and Baluchestan province and the lowest value was for Razavi KhorasanIt seems that in Sistan and Baluchestan the higher values for some of the indexes such as area under cultivation of forage and perennial crops, appropriate use of agricultural machinery and also plant diversity improved the structural health. The similar results also observed for organizational health. Lower use of pesticides and chemical fertilizers are the main reason for better conditions of organizational health in Sistan and Baluchestan province. The result for functional health was different and the best condition of functional health observed in Razavi Khorasan whereas the worst condition observed in South Khorasan. The higher value of functional health of agroecosystem in Razavi Khorasan province mainly is because of good conditions of soil structure and higher yield of different crops such as forage, vegetables, industrial crops and cereals. Considering the total agroecosystem health the highest value observed in Razavi Khorasan followed by Sistan and Baluchestan, North Khorasan and South Khorasan. Based on our classification total agroecosystem health in South Khorasan province was very poor and in other provinces was poor. The main reasons for the low value of agroecosystem health in all of the studied provinces are: soil compaction, low rainfall, using traditional methods of irrigation, insufficient cultivation of forage and perennial crops and also nitrogen fixing legumes. The fertilizer use efficiency in all of the provinces is low and these conditions could be harmful either for human and environment health.
 
Conclusion
Based on results the total agroecosystem health in South Khorasan province was very poor whereas in other three provinces total agroecosystem health was poor. The main reasons for bad condition of agroecosystem health in these provinces are: soil compaction because of unsuitable use of agricultural machinery, the low amount of precipitations, nitrogen use efficiency and area under cultivation of perennial, forage and nitrogen fixing crops. It seems that solving these problem using different methods such as increasing agrochemical use efficiency, applying good rotation and increasing water use efficiency could improve the total agroecosystem health in the eastern provinces of Iran.
 Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the financial support of the project by Vice President for Research and Technology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran.

Keywords

• Agroecology
• Functional health
• Stability
• Sustainability

20.1001.1.20087713.1398.11.3.10.9

---

References

Alkorta, I., Albizu, I., Amezaga, I., Onaindia, M., Buchner, V., and Garbisu, C. 2004. Climbing a ladder: A step-by-step approach to understanding the concept of agroecosystem health. Reviews on Environmental Health 19(2): 141-159.

Altieri, M.A. 1999. The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems.Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment. 74: 19-31.

Anosike, N., Coughenour, C.M. 1990. The socioeconomic basis of farm enterprise diversification decisions. Rural Sociology 55: 1–24.

Barak, P., Jobe, B.O., Krueger, A., Peterson, L.A., Laird, D.A. 1998. Effects of long-term soil acidification due to agricultural inputs in Wisconsin. Plant Soil 197: 61-69.

Bazrgar, A. 2011. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of sugar beet production in various production systems in Khorasan. A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Ph.D. in Agronomy, Gorgan University of Agricultural Science and Natural Resources. 201p. (In Persian with English Summary)

Burel F and Baudry J. 1995. Species biodiversity in changing agricultural landscapes: a case study in the Pays d’a´uge, France. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment 55: 193–200.

Caporali, F., and Campligia, E. 2001. Increasing sustainability in Mediterranean cropping systems with self-reseeding annual legumes. In: Gliessman, S.R., ed, Agroecosystem sustainability: Developing practical strategies. Boca Raton, Florida, USA: CRC Press, p. 15-27.

Conway, G.R. 1987. The properties of agroecosystems. Agricultural Systems 24:95–117.

Conway, G.R., and McCracken, J.A. 1990. Rapid rural appraisal and agroecosystem analysis.In Agroecology and Small Farm Development.Altieri, M.A., and Hecht, S.B., eds. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 221–235.

FAO. 2007. The State of Food and Agriculture: Paying farmersfor environmental services, FAO, Rome, Italy.

Farber, S., Costanza, R., Wilson, M., Erickson, J. and Childers, D. 2006.Linking ecology and economics for ecosystem management. BioScience 56: 117–129.

Fornara, D.A., and Tilman, D. 2008. Plant functional composition influences rates of soil carbon and nitrogen accumulation, Journal of Ecology 96: 314–322.

Gallopin, G.C. 1994. Agroecosystem health: A guiding concept for agricultural research In Agroecosystem Health with Special Reference to the Consultative Group for International Research (CGIAR): Proceedings of an International Workshop. Nielsen, N.O., ed. Guelph, Ontario, Canada: Agroecosystem Health Project, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, pp. 94–97.

Glover, J.D. and Reganold, J.P. 2010. Perennial grains: Food security for the future. Issues in Science and Technology 26(2): 41-47.

Heermann, D.F., Wallender, W.W. and Bos, M.G. 1990. Irrigation efficiency and uniformity. In: Hoffman, G.S., Howell, T.A., Soloman, K.H. (eds). Management of farm irrigation system. ASAE, St. Joseph, MI pp 125–149.

Karami, E. 1995. Agricultural extension: the question of sustainable development in Iran. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 5-61-72.

Koocheki, A., Nassiri, M., and Kamali1. Gh. A. 2007. Climate indices of Iran under climate change. Journal of agricultural researches 5: 133-142. (In Persian with English summary)

Koocheki, A., Nasiri, M., Jahanbin, G., and Zare Feyzabadi, A. 2004. Diversity of crops in Iran. Iranian Journal of Rang and Desert Research 9: 49-67. (In Persian with English summary)

Lansing, S. 2006. Perfect order: recognizing complexity in Bali. Princeton University Press.

Lant, C., Kraft, S., Beaulieu, J., Bennett, D., Loftus, T. and Nicklow, J. 2005. Using GIS-based ecological-economic modeling to evaluate policies affecting agricultural watersheds. Ecological Economics 55: 467–484.

Li, B.,Xie, H., Wu, J., Hong, R., Chong, J., and Wang. C. 2007. Study on the agro ecosystem health assessment in Western China. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, IGARSS 2007.IEEE International. pp 813 – 818.

Magdoff, F. and Van Es, H. 2009. Building soils for better crops.3nd ed. Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (SARE). University of Maryland and University of Vermont.

Mariolakos, I. 2007. Water resources management in the framework of sustainable development. Desalination, 213: 147–151.

Matson, P.A., Parton, W.J., Power, A.G., and Swift, M.J. 1997. Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science, 277: 504–509.

Robertson, G.P. and Swinton, S.M. 2005. Reconciling agricultural productivity and environmental integrity: A grand challenge for agriculture. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 3: 38–46.

Rodrigues, M., Santos, L., Tiago, P., Rodrigues, A.P., de Souza, C.R., Lopes, C.M., Maroco, J.P., Pereira, J.S., and Chaves, M.M. 2008.Hydraulic and chemical signalling in the regulation of stomatal conductance and plant water use in field grapevines growing under deficit irrigation. Functional Plant Biology 35: 565–579.

Thrupp, L. A. 1998. Cultivating diversity: agrobiodiversity and food security. World Resources Institute, Washington D.C.

Vadrevu, K.P., Cardina, J., Hitzhusen, F., Bayoh, I., Moore, R., Parker, J., Stinner, B., Stinner, D., and Hoy, C. 2008. Case study of an integrated framework for quantifying agroecosystemhealth.Ecosystems 11: 283-306.

Vafabakhsh, K., Koocheki, A., NassiriMahallati, M. 2007. Agroecosystem health assessment in Mashhad. Journal of Iranian Field Crop Research 1(5): 177-185.

Van Es, H.M., Czymmek, K.J. and Ketterings, Q.M. 2002. Management effects on N leaching and guidelines for an N leaching index in New York. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation57(6): 499–504.

Xu, W. and Mage, J.A. 2001. A review of concepts and criteria for assessing agroecosystem health including a preliminary case study of southern Ontario. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment 83: 215-233.

Zhu, W., Wang, S., and Caldwell, C.D. 2012. Pathways of assessing agroecosystem health and agroecosystem management. ActaEcologicaSinica 32: 9-17.