Effect of Relay Triple Intercropping Arrangements of Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris), Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), and Mung Bean (Vigna radiate L.) on Yield and Yield Components

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• Alireza Koocheki
• Mahdi Nassiri Mahallati
• Mohammad Hassan Hatefi Farajian
• Mina Hooshmand

Department of Agrotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran

10.22067/agry.2022.20158.0

Abstract

Introduction
In conventional agriculture, crop production has gradually shifted from ecological production principles to economic approaches, which has led to the destruction of natural resources and land use change, as well as the reduction in resource consumption (Koocheki et al., 2016b). Satisfying the nutritional needs of a growing population whilst limiting environmental repercussions will require sustainable intensification of agriculture. The adverse effects of climate change are significantly decreasing yield and yield stability over time in current monocropping systems. We argue that intercropping, which is the production of multiple crops on the same area of land, could play an essential role in this intensification. Intercropping often increases resource use efficiency and agricultural productivity compared with growing the component crops solely and can enhance yield stability (Martin-Guay et al., 2018; Raseduzzaman & Jensen, 2017). In the case of an intercropping strategy, the growing period for the legume, as a cover crop, is longer to provide a high amount of fixed nitrogen and potential ground cover to compete with weeds (Vrignon-Brenas et al., 2018). The land equivalent ratio (LER) is often computed as an indicator to determine the efficacy of intercropping that measures land productivity. LER may be interpreted as the relative area required by sole crops to produce the same yields as achieved in a unit area of intercrop. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of relay intercropping as replacement series of three plant species such as chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), mung bean (Vigna radiate L.), and sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.), on the yield, yield components, and land equivalent ratio under climatic conditions of Mashhad.
Materials and Methods
A field experiment was conducted at the Agricultural Research Station of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran, during the growing seasons of 2015-2016. For this purpose, a randomized complete block design with three replications was used. The treatments included sole cropping of chickpea (C), mung bean (M), and sugar beet (S), as well as intercropping with 25% L + 75% S, 50% L + 50% S, and 75% L + 25% S. The investigated traits of mung bean and chickpea were plant height, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, number of branches per plant, seed weight per plant, and 100-seed weight, as well as the number of hollow pods per plant, number of seeds per plant, biological yield, seed yield, and harvest index. For sugar beet, the traits investigated were root height, fresh yield of root, dry yield of root, dry weight of shoot, sucrose content, and sucrose yield. The land equivalent ratio of chickpea, mung bean, and sugar beet was calculated (Sullivan, 2003) as follows: LER = Y1/I1 + Y2/I2 + Y3/I3, where Y1, Y2, and Y3 represent chickpea, mung bean, and sugar beet yield in intercropping, and I1, I2, and I3 represent chickpea, mung bean, and sugar beet yield in mono-culture, respectively. SAS 9.2 was used for analysis of variance. All the means were compared according to Duncan's test (p ≤ 0.05).
Results and Discussion
The results showed that the effect of relay triple intercropping arrangements of three species, such as mung bean and chickpea with sugar beet, was significant on yield components and seed yield, biological yield (p ≤ 0.05). The highest seed yield of chickpea and mung bean (2912 and 1247.83 kg/ha, respectively) and biological yield (6237.5 and 6816.7 kg/ha) were observed in sole culture, respectively. Also, the highest amount of fresh root yield was related to its sole cropping with 65242 kg/ha. The highest and lowest LER were calculated for 75% S + 25% L (with 1.53) and 25% S + 75% L (with 0.94), respectively.
Conclusion
Intercropping systems using ecological principles are one of the sustainable solutions to choosing plants suited to the needs, and competitiveness is very important. According to the results, relay triple intercropping of chickpea, and mung bean with sugar beet can be considered as ecological management and ecological intensification in the agroecosystems.

Keywords

• Ecological intensification
• Land equivalent ratio
• Replacement series
• Sucrose

---

References

Anas, M., Jabbar, A., Sarwar, M.A., Ullah, R., Abuzar, M.K., Ahmad, I., & Latif, S. (2017). Intercropping sunflower with mung bean for improved productivity and net economic return under irrigated conditions. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research. 30(4), 338-345. http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjar/2017/30.4.338.345

Awal, M.A., Koshi, H., & Ikeda, T. (2006). Radiation interception and use by maize/peanut intercrop canopy. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 139(1-2), 74-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.06.001

Bommarco, R., Kleijn, D., & Potts, S.G. (2013). Ecological intensification: Harnessing ecosystem services for food security. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 28(4), 230-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2012.10.012

Bommarco, R., Vico, G., & Hallin, S. (2018). Expl oiting ecosystem services in agriculture for increased food security. Global Food Security 17: 57-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2018.04.001

Edrees, GH.H., El-Nakhlawy, F.S., & Ismail, S.M. (2019). Performance of Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) Cultivars under the Intercropping with Clover in Arid Land Conditions. Journal of King Abdulaziz University-Meteorology Environment and Arid Land Agriculture Sciences. 28(1), 11-19. Doi: 10.4197/Met. 28-1.2

El-Nakhlawy, F.S., & Ismail, S.M. (2018). Optimizing land use efficiency in arid land conditions through sugar beet–clover intercropping. Sugar Technology. 20(5), 534-539. DOI: 10.1007/s12355-017-0578-7

Ghale Noyee, S., Koocheki, A., Naseri poor yazdi, M. T., & Jahan, M. (2017). Effect of Different Treatments of Mixed and Row Intercropping on Yield and Yield Components of Sesame and Bean. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research. 15(3), 588-602. Doi: 10.22067/gsc.v15i3.49345

Gliessman, SR. 1997. Agroecology: Ecological Processes in Sustainable Agriculture, Arbor Press.

Hajinia, S., Ahmadvand, G., & Mehrabi, A.A. (2019). Evaluation of yield and yield components of common millet and soyabean in different intercropping ratio under deficit irrigation levels in Hamadan region. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research. 16(4),761-779. (In Persian with English Summary). DOI: 10.22067/gsc.v16i4.66825

Hamzei, J., Babaei, M. (2016). Study of Quality and Quantity of Yield and Land Equivalent Ratio of Sunflower in Intercropping Series with Bean. Journal of Agroecology. 8(4), 490-504. Doi: 10.22067/jag.v8i4.37250

Hamzei, J., & Seyedi, M. (2013). Evaluation of Barley (Hordeum vulgare) and Chickpea (Cicer arietinum) Intercropping Systems Using Advantageous Indices of Intercropping under Weed Interference Conditions. Journal of Agriculture Knowledge. 6(9), 1-12.

Hodiani Mehr, A., Dahmardeh, M., Khammari, I., & Asgharipoor, M.R. (2017). Effects of tillage systems on changes of soil nutrients, yield and land equivalent ratio in roselle – green gram intercropping. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research. 15(2), 311-322. (In Persian with English Summary). DOI: 10.22067/GSC.V15I2.48487

Khazaei, M., 2015. The study of maize and sugar beet intercropping. Journal of Crops Improvement 16(4): 987-997. (In Persian with English Summary). https://doi.org/10.22059/jci.2015.53593

Koocheki, A., Lalehgani, B., & Najibnia, S. (2009). Evaluation of productivity in bean and corn intercropping. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research. 7(2), 605-614. (In Persian with English Summary).

Koocheki, A., Nassiri Mahallati, M., Borumand Rezazadeh, Z., Jahani, M., & Jafari, L. (2014). Yield responses of black cumin (Nigella sativa L.) to intercropping with chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L). Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research. 12(1), 1-8. (In Persian with English Summary). DOI: 10.22067/GSC.V12I1.36624

Koocheki, A., Nassiri, M., Zarghani, H., & Norooziyan, A. (2017). Evaluation of yield and radiation use efficiency of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) in relay intercropping. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research. 14(4), 539-557. (In Persian with English Summary). DOI: 10.22067/gsc.v14i4.51159

Koocheki, A., Solouki, H., & Karbor, S.(2016a). Study of ecological aspects of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) and mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) intercropping in weed management treatments. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research. 7(2), 27-44. (In Persian with English Summary). DOI: 10.22067/ijpr.v7i2.42232

Koocheki, A., Zarghani, H., & Norooziyan, A.(2016b). Comparison of yield and yield components of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.), sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) and red bean (Phaseolus calcaratus) under different intercropping arrangements. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research. 14(2), 226-243. (In Persian with English Summary). DOI: 10.22067/GSC.V14I2.51158

Martin-Guay, M.O., Paquette, A., Dupras, J., & Rivest, D. (2018). The new green revolution: Sustainable intensification of agriculture by intercropping. Science of the Total Environment. 615, 767-772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.024

Mashhadi, T., Nakhzari Moghaddam, A., & Sabouri, H. (2015). Investigation of competition indices in intercropping of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under nitrogen consumption. Journal of Agroecology. 7(3), 344-355. (In Persian with English Summary). DOI: 10.22067/JAG.V7I3.26662

Masri, M., & Safin, A. (2015). Agro- economic impact of intercropping canola and onion on some sugar beet varieties under different nitrogen rates. Journal of Plant Production. 6(10), 1661-1678. DOI: 10.21608/jpp.2015.52078

Mirshekari, B., 2016. Study effect of sowing ratios in marigold (Calendula officinalis) and mung bean (Vigna radiata) intercropping systems on weed control and mung bean yield improvement. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research. 7(2), 152-163. (In Persian with English Summary). DOI: 10.22067/IJPR.V7I2.45919

Mobasser, H., Barjasteh, S.H., & Keshtehgar, A. (2018). Effect of replacement and additive intercropping on the yield of maize (Zea mayes L.) and potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.) in the region of Nikshar. Journal of Agroecology. 10(2), 400-415. (In Persian with English Summary). DOI: 10.22067/jag.v10i2.53841

Momen Keykha, M., Khammari, L., Dahmardeh, M., & Forouzandeh, M. (2018). Assessing yield and physiological aspects of guar (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.) and sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) intercropping under different levels of nitrogen. Journal of Agroecology. 9(4), 1050-1069. (In Persian with English Summary). DOI: 10.22067/jag.v9i4.51084

Nasrollahzadeh Asl, A., Chavoshgoli, A., Valizadegan, E., Valiloo, R., & Nasrollahzadeh Asl, V. (2012). Evaluation of sunflower (Helianthus annus L.) and pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) intercropping based on additive method. Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production. 22(2), 79-90. (In Persian with English Summary)

Pouramir, F., Nasiri mahalati, M., Koocheki, A., & Ghorbani, R. (2010). Evaluation the Effect of Different Planting ratios on Yield and Yield Components of Intercropping Sesame and Chickpea in Additive Series. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research. 8(3), 393-402. Doi: 10.22067/gsc.v8i3.7716

Rafiiolhossaini, M., Salehi, F., & Mazhari, M. (2016). The effect of drought stress intensity and stage on agronomic characteristics of two common bean cultivars. Engineering of Desert Ecosystem. 11, 45-56. (In Persian with English Summary)

Raseduzzaman, M. (2016). Intercropping for enhanced yield stability and food security. Master’s Thesis in Agricultural Science/Agroecology. Sveriges Lantbrukuniveresitet Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20053.73448

Rezaei-Chiyaneh, E., & Gholinezhad, E. (2014). Study of agronomic characteristics and advantage indices in intercropping of additive series of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and Black Cumin (Nigella sativa L.). Journal of Agroecology. 7(3), 381-396. (In Persian with English Summary). DOI: 10.22067/JAG.V7I3.35858

Salama, H.S., Dina El-S, E.K., & Nawar, A.I. (2016). Additive intercropping of wheat, barley, and faba bean with sugar beet: impact on yield, quality and land use efficiency. Egyptian Plant Journal of Agronomy. 38(3), 413-430. DOI: 10.21608/AGRO.2016.1277

Seyedhamzeh, SH., & Damari, B. (2017). The conceptual model of food and nutrition security in Iran. Community Health. 4(3), 223-232. (In Persian with English Summary). https://doi.org/10.22037/ch.v4i3.15555

Seyedi, M., Hamzei, J., Ahmadvand, G., & Abutalebian, M.A. (2012). The evaluation of weed suppression and crop production in barley-chickpea intercrops. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production. 22(3), 101-115. (In Persian with English Summary)