The Effect of Seed Inoculation with Funneliformis mossea Mycorrhiza on Some Morphophysiological and Biochemical Traits of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Under Salinity Stress Conditions

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Department of Plant Production and Genetics, School of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.

2 Department Soil Science and Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction
Barley is the fourth most important cereal in the world and is considered one of the least expected crops that has adapted and distributed globally due to its resistance to salinity. The growing world's population has expanded the cultivated domain, which caused the utilization of extravagant chemical fertilizers in modern agricultural cropping systems. This approach has not been cost-effective and has caused severe environmental damages like contaminating the underground water and creating unusual salinity in the fields. Therefore, it seems to be essential to replace risky approaches with eco-friendlier methods. In addition, with increasing environmental stress as a result of climate warming, we need to understand better ways to reduce environmental stress for the sustainable production of barley. Mycorrhiza has been introduced as an essential portion of agricultural ecosystems because of its positive effect on the soil texture, growth, and productivity of almost all host plants. This trend is attributed to reduced chemical fertilizer demands. Mycorrhiza enhances the water relations under stress conditions, water and nutrient uptake by augmenting the hyphae network. In this study we aimed to investigate the role of mycorrhizal inoculation in alleviating the detrimental effects of salinity stress on barley. Our hypotheses were: (i) mycorrhizal inoculation can alleviate the detrimental effect of stress at low to medium levels but not at high levels of salinity, and (ii) there is an interaction effect of low levels of salinity and arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis lead to higher the performance of barley.
Materials and Methods
In order to evaluate the effects of Funneliformis mosseae mycorrhiza on morphological, biochemical and yield of barley, one experiment was conducted in research farm of School of Agriculture, Shiraz University. Field experiment was a split-plot in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Factors included salinity levels (0.4, 4, 8 and 12 dS m-1) as the main factor and the mycorrhiza (with and without) was applied as sub factor.  Data were analyzed by using SAS 9.2 software and the means were separated using LSD test at 5% probability level.
Results and Discussion
The results of the experiment showed that salinity decreased yield and vegetation traits, including plant height, number of tillers per plant, number of spikes per plant, number of seeds per spike, 1000-grain weight, grain yield, and biological yield. All the measured traits in plants inoculated with mycorrhizal fungi were higher than the non-mycorrhizal plants. The inoculation of plants in most cases improved the effects of stress; i.e., inoculation under high salinity stress (12 dS m-1) increased SOD by 5.7%, CAT by 8.0%, K concentration by 30.8%, K/Na ratio by 131.1%, plant height by 8.1%, number of spikes per plant by 9.4%, number of grain per spike by 6.6%, 1000-grain weight by 4.2%, grain yield by 20.2%, and biological yield by 11.0% compared with non-inoculation plants. Also, Fayaz and Zahedi (2021) reported that mycorrhizal inoculation could promote the growth and salt tolerance of wheat cultivars by improving osmoregulation and antioxidant enzyme activity and reducing the Na+/K+ ratio.
Conclusion
In this experiment, inoculation treatment alleviated the high salinity stress (12 dS m-1) effects in most cases and raised the grain yield and K+/Na+ ratio up to 20.2 and 131.1%, respectively, compared with non-inoculation plants. The results from this experiment showed that Funneliformis mosseae fungi inoculation could promote the growth and salt tolerance of barley by improving antioxidant enzyme activity, and ion homeostasis. In summary, the use of Funneliformis mosseae could reduce salinity damages by improving the physiological and biochemical responses of barley. This study highlighted the potential role of Funneliformis mosseae inoculation, in particular with native strains, as an innovative and eco-friendly technology for a sustainable crop-growing system in arid and semi-arid areas.







 




 
 

Keywords

Main Subjects

©2023 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source.

References

  1. Abd El-Ghany, M.F., & Attia, M. (2020). Effect of exopolysaccharide-producing bacteria and melatonin on faba bean production in saline and non-saline soil. Agronomy, 10(3), 316-325. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10030316
  2. Abdel-Fattah, G.M., & Asrar, A.W.A. (2012). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal application to improve growth and tolerance of wheat (Triticum aestivum) plants grown in saline soil. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 34(1), 267-277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-011-0825-6
  3. Abo-Ghalia, H.H., & Khalafallah, A.A. (2008). Responses of wheat plants associated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to short-term water stress followed by recovery at three growth stages. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 4, 570-580.
  4. Ahadi, S., Maroufi, A., Bahramnejad, B., & Siosemardeh, A. (2022). Effect of salinity stress and application of salisylic acid on expression of TaSC and TaNIP genes in two bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 24(1), 50-63. (In Persian with English Summary)
  5. Al-Karaki, G., McMichael, B.Z.A.K.J., & Zak, J. (2004). Field response of wheat to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and drought stress. Mycorrhiza, 14(4), 263-269. https://doi.org/1016/j.soilbio.2015.02.020
  6. Banaei, M.H., Moameni, A., Baybordi, M., & Malakouti, M.J. (2004). Iran Soils: New transformations in the identification, management and operation. Soil and Water Research Institute, Tehran, Iran. (in Persian)
  7. Beauchamp, C., & Fridovich, I. (1971). Superoxide dismutase: Improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels. Analytical Biochemistry, 44(1), 276-287. https://doi.org/1016/0003-2697(71)90370-8
  8. Behl, R.K., Sharma, H., Kumar, V., & Singh, K.P. (2003). Effect of dual inoculation of VA mycorrhiza and Azotobacter chroococcum on above flag leaf characters in wheat. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 49(1), 25-31. https://doi.org/1080/03650340301497
  9. Borzouei, A., Kafi, M., Khazaei, H.R., & Shalmani, M.M. (2012). Effect of irrigation water salinity on root traits of two salt-sensitive and salt-tolerant wheat cultivars and its relationship with yield in greenhouse. Journal of Science and Technology of Greenhouse Culture, 2(8), 95-107. (In Persian with English Summary) ‏
  10. Bothe, H. (2012). Arbuscular mycorrhiza and salt tolerance of plants. Symbiosis, 58(1-3), 7-16.
  11. Chance, B., & Maehly, A.C. (1995). Assay of catalase and peroxidase. Methods Enzymology, 2, 764-765. https://doi.org/1002/9780470110171.ch14
  12. Colmer, T.D., Munns, R., & Flowers, T.J. (2006). Improving salt tolerance of wheat and barley: Future prospects. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture,45(11), 1425-1443. https://doi.org/1071/EA04162
  13. Dhindsa, R.S., Plumb-Dhindsa, P., & Thorpe, T.A. (1981). Leaf senescence: Correlated with increased levels of membrane permeability and lipid peroxidation, and decreased levels of superoxide dismutase and catalase. Journal of Experimental Botany, 32(1), 93-101. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/32.1.93
  14. Farhoudi, R., & Motamedi, M. (2017). Assessing physiological characteristics and dry matter of two mung bean genotypes. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 27(3), 73-86. ((In Persian with English Summary))
  15. Fayaz, F., & Zahedi, M. (2021). Beneficial effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on wheat (Triticum aestivum) nutritional status and tolerance indices under soil salinity stress. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 45(2), 185-201. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2021.1952228
  16. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2020). The FAOSTAT Database. Available at Web site http://faostat.fao.org/default.aspx (verified 21 May 2022).
  17. Gholamhoseini, M., Ghalavand, A., Dolatabadian, A., Jamshidi, E., & Khodaei-Joghan, A. (2013). Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculation on growth, yield, nutrient uptake and irrigation water productivity of sunflowers grown under drought stress. Agricultural Water Management, 117, 106-114. https://doi.org/1016/j.agwat.2012.11.007
  18. Gholinezhad, E., & Darvishzadeh, R. (2015). Effect of mycorrhizal fungi on yield and yield components of sesame (Sesamum indicum) landraces under different irrigation levels. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 25(3), 119-135. ‏(in Persian) https://doi.org/10.22067/GSC.V15I1.49403
  19. Giri, B., & Mukerji, K.G. (2004). Mycorrhizal inoculant alleviates salt stress in Sesbania aegyptica and Sesbania gradiflora under field condition: Evidenced for reduced sodium and improved magnesium uptake. Mycorrhizal, 14, 307-312. https://doi.org/1007/s00572-003-0274-1
  20. Giri, B., Kapoor, R., & Mukerji, K.G. (2007). Improved tolerance of Acacia nilotica to salt stress by arbuscular mycorrhiza, Glomus fasciculatum may be partly related to elevated K/Na ratios in root and shoot tissues. Microbial Ecology, 54, 753–760. https://doi.org/1007/s00248-007-9239-9
  21. Habibi, S., Meskarbashee, M., & Farzaneh, M. (2015). Effect of mycorrhizal fungus (Glomus ) on wheat (Triticum aestivum). yield and yield components with regard to irrigation water quality. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 13(3), 471-484. (In Persian with English Summary) ,https://doi.org/10.22067/GSC.V13I3.51155
  22. Havlin, J.L., Beaton, J.D., Tisdale, S.L., & Nelson, W.L. (2004). Soil Fertility and Fertilizers: An Introduction to Nutrient Management. (7th). Pretice Hall, New Jersey.
  23. Horneck, D.A., & Hanson, D. (1997). Determination of potassium and sodium by flame emission spectrophotometry. In Y. Kalra (Ed.). Handbook of reference methods for plant analysis. CRC Press, USA. p. 158-160.
  24. Hosseini, E., Zarei, M., Sepehri, M., & Safarzadeh, S. (2021). Do bagasse biochar and microbial inoculants positively affect barley grain yield and nutrients, and microbial activity?. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 45(4), 522-539. ‏ https://doi.org/1080/01904167.2021.1952229
  25. Huang, Z., He, C.X., He, Z.Q., Zou, Z.R., & Zhang, Z.B. (2010). The effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on reactive oxyradical scavenging system of tomato under salt tolerance. Agricultural Sciences in China, 9(8), 1150-1159. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/S1671-2927(09)60202-9
  26. Jabbarzadeh, Z., Khosh-Khui, M., & Salehi, H. (2009). The effect of foliar-applied salicylic acid on flowering of African violet. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 3(4), 4693-4696. ‏‏
  27. Jamshidi, E., Ghalavand, A., Salehi, A., Zare, M.J., & Jamshidi, A.R. (2009). Effect of Arbuscular mycorrhizal on yield, yield components and plant characteristics of sunflower (Helianthus annuus) under drought stress conditions. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 11(2), 136-150. ‏‏((In Persian with English Summary))
  28. Jerbi, M., Labidi, S., Laruelle, F., Tisserant, B., Dalpé, Y., Lounès-Hadj Sahraoui, A., & Ben Jeddi, F. (2022b). Contribution of native and exotic arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in improving the physiological and biochemical response of Hulless barley (Hordeum vulgare nudum L.) to drought. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 22, 2187–2204. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-022-00802-2
  29. Jerbi, M., Labidi, S., Laruelle, F., Tisserant, B., Jeddi, F.B., & Sahraoui, A.L.H. (2022a). Mycorrhizal biofertilization improves grain yield and quality of hulless barley (Hordeum vulgare ssp. nudum) under water stress conditions. Journal of Cereal Science, 104, 103436. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2022.103436
  30. Khajehpour, M.R. (2014). Cereal crops. Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran. (in Persian)
  31. Khan, M.S.A., Hamid, A., & Karim, M.A. (1997). Effect of sodium chloride on germination and seedling characteristics of different types of rice (Oryza sativa). Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 179(3), 163-169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.1997.tb00512.x
  32. Maas, E.V., & Hoffman, G.J. (1977). Crop salt tolerance-current assessment. Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division,103(2), 115-134. https://doi.org/10.1061/JRCEA4.0001137
  33. Mahlooji, M. (2022). Effects of salinity stress and zinc application on some physiological traits in grain filling of three barley cultivars. Journal of Plant Process and Function, 11(48), 211-227. ((In Persian with English Summary)) ‏ http://jispp.iut.ac.ir/article-1-1573-en.html
  34. Mashi, A., Galeshi, S., Zainali, E., & Noorinia, A. (2008). Salinity effect on seed yield and yield components in four Hull-les barley. Journal of Agricultural Science and Natural Resources, 14(5), 363-373.
  35. Moradmand, M., Naderi, M., Mahlooji, M., & Rostami, A. (2010). Comparison of elite barley lines and cultivars under water saline condition in Isfahan region. New Finding in Agriculture, 4(2), 179-191. ‏((In Persian with English Summary))
  36. Munns, R., & Termaat, A. (1986). Whole-plant responses to salinity. Functional Plant Biology, 13(1), 143-160. https://doi.org/10.1071/PP9860143
  37. Mustafa, G., Akhtar, M.S., & Abdullah, R. (2019). Global concern for salinity on various agro-ecosystems. In M. Akhtar, (Ed.). Salt stress, microbes, and plant interactions: Causes and solution. Springer, Singapore. p. 1-19. ‏
  38. Porcel, R., Barea, J.M., & Ruiz‐Lozano, J.M. (2003). Antioxidant activities in mycorrhizal soybean plants under drought stress and their possible relationship to the process of nodule senescence. New Phytologist, 157(1), 135-143. https://doi.org/1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00658.x
  39. Raei, Y., Shariati, J., & Weisany, W. (2015). Effect of biological fertilizers on seed oil, yield and yield components of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) at different irrigation levels. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 25(1), 65-84. ‏((In Persian with English Summary))
  40. Ranjbar, G.H., Pirasteh, A.H., Emam, Y., & Hosseinzadeh, S.H. (2013). Effect of salinity on different growth stages of wheat, cv. Roshan. ‏Crop Production in Environmental Stress, 5(1), 23-31. ((In Persian with English Summary))
  41. Saadeghi-Azar, L., Madah Hoseini, S., Rahimi, A., & Mohammadi Mirik, A.A. (2013). Effect of salinity stress on some germination and vegetative growth indices of lentil genotypes. Journal of Crops Improvement, 15(4), 107-117. ‏((In Persian with English Summary)) https://doi.org/22059/jci.2013.51370
  42. Sajedi, N.A., Ardakani, M.R., Rejali, F., Mohabbati, F., & Miransari, M. (2010). Yield and yield components of hybrid corn (Zea mays) as affected by mycorrhizal symbiosis and zinc sulfate under drought stress. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, 16(4), 343-351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-010-0035-5
  43. Salehi, M., & Arzani, A. (2011). Effect of salinity stress on morpho-physiological traits of triticale lines. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences,13(4), 697-711. ‏((In Persian with English Summary))
  44. Saxena, J., Chandra, S., & Nain, L. (2013). Synergistic effect of phosphate solubilizing rhizobacteria and arbuscular mycorrhiza on growth and yield of wheat plants. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition,13(2), 511-525. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-95162013005000040 
  45. Shabani, A., Sepaskhah, A.R., & Kamgar, H.A. (2013). Responses of agronomic components of rapeseed (Brassica napus) as influenced by deficit irrigation, water salinity and planting method. International Journal of Plant Production, 7(2), 313-340. ‏((In Persian with English Summary))
  46. Smith, S.E., & Read, D.J. (2008). Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. (3th). Academic, London.
  47. Sobhani, M., & Majidian, M. (2014). Evaluation of different salinity stress and plant densities effects on quantitative and qualitative forage and grain yields of kochia in Arak region. Journal of Plant Production Research, 21(1), 91-110. ‏((In Persian with English Summary))
  48. Surendran, U., & Vani, D. (2013). Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in sugarcane productivity under semiarid tropical agroecosystem in India. International Journal of Plant Production, 7(2), 269-277. https://doi.org/22069/IJPP.2012.986
  49. Vashev, B., Gaiser, T., Ghawana, T., de Vries, A., & Stahr, K. (2010). Biosafor Project Deliv- erable 9: Cropping Potentials for Saline Areas in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh. University of Hohenheim, Hohenheim, Germany.
  50. Walia, H., Wilson, C., Wahid, A., Condamine, P., Cui, X., & Close, T.J. (2006). Expression analysis of barley (Hordeum vulgare) during salinity stress. Functional and Integrative Genomics, 6(2), 143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10142-005-0013-0
  51. Wang, J., Yuan, J., Ren, Q., Zhang, B., Zhang, J., Huang, R., & Wang, G.G. (2022). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi enhanced salt tolerance of Gleditsia sinensis by modulating antioxidant activity, ion balance and P/N ratio. Plant Growth Regulation, 97(1), 33-49. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-021-00792-8
  52. Yadav, N.S., Shukla, P., Jha, A.K., Agarwal, P., & Jha, B. (2012). The SbSOS1 gene from the extreme halophyte Salicornia brachiata enhances Na+ loading in xylem and confers salt tolerance in transgenic tobacco. BMC Plant Biology, 12(1), 188. https://doi.org/1186/1471-2229-12-188
  53. Zamani, S., Neza, M. T., Bybordi, A., Behdad, M., Behdad, M., & Khorshidi, B. (2011). Effect of different NaCl salinity on antioxidant enzyme activity and relative water in winter canola (Brassica napus). Agricultural Science Research, 7, 49-57.
  54. Zarei, M., Saleh-Rastin, N., Jouzani, G.S., Savaghebi, G., & Buscot, F. (2008). Arbuscular mycorrhizal abundance in contaminated soils around a zinc and lead deposit. European Journal of Soil Biology, 44(4), 381-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2008.06.004

 

Send comment about this article
CAPTCHA Image

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 02 June 2022
  • Revise Date: 29 July 2022
  • Accept Date: 18 September 2022
  • First Publish Date: 18 September 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics