Temporal Trends of Ecological Footprint of Foodstuffs in Iran and Evaluation of Future Scenarios

Document Type : Scientific - Research

Authors

• M. Nassiri
• A. Koocheki
• Surur Khorramdel

FUM

10.22067/jag.v10i4.40525

Abstract

Introduction
Ecological footprint is an index based on the land area needed for basic requirements and also the waste disposal of an individual in a specific geographic location and usually calculated on the basis of area per capita which is normally global hectare (Gha) per capita. Total world ecological footprint for the year 2010 has been estimated to be 18.2 billion Gha with a per capita 2.7 Gha. Biocapacity is another concept which together with footprint sustainability of ecosystems means the whole area of a specific geographic region which has a proper biomass production and waste absorption capacity. Measurement of ecological footprint together with biocapacity provides useful information on the intensity of resource use and the status of environmental sustainability. Evaluation of footprint by national bodies has been emphasized more, rather than the international ones. Footprint for food production also called foodprint is the area required for food production for a population (energy required for transportation and processing is not consider). The purpose of present study was to evaluate production and consumption status of different groups of agricultural foods and to measure the foodprint in Iran. Calculation of biocapacity and ecological deficiency in the country with regards to different consumption pattern was other purpose of this study.
Materials and Methods
Time trends of food and total ecological footprint, biocapacity and ecological deficit of Iran during 1990-2013 were analyzed and based on trend equation the value of these indices were predicted for 2025.
Data was collected for different group of agriculture foods from Ministry of Jihad Agriculture, Ministry of Commerce and also from other published data in official databases in the country.
The effect of the amount of consumption on foodprint was considered on the basis of the above scenarios for the population of the country in year 2050. Furthermore the effect of water and nitrogen use efficiency on foodprint was also considered on the bases of food production in the present pattern and in a condition where these efficiencies are enhanced by 20%. The balance between production and consumption in the future was calculated by Gini coefficient.
Results and discussion
Results indicate that food and total footprint were increased respectively, by 3.3 and 2.9% per year, during the study period and this trend would be led to 1.05 and 3.34 Gha/person for food and total footprint, respectively. Total biocapacity of the country in 2013 was estimated as 0.82 Gha/person which was lower than the value for world (1.8 Gha/person) and Middle East average (0.91 Gha/person). Croplands accounted for 47% of total biocapacity of the country while forests and rangelands contributed by 30%. During the study period, biocapacity showed a positive trend but with a slow slope toward leading to 0.85 Gha/person in 2025. Ecological deficit of the country (ecological footprint minus biocapacity) which was 0.7 Gha/person in 1990 has increased by 5.9% per year with a value of 1.9 Gha/person in 2013 and predicted to reach 2.5 Gha/person by 2025. The balance between consumption and national food production as well as footprint of food stuffs were analyzed under 4 scenarios based on different level of consumption of meat and dairy. In all scenarios of increase in consumption of animal products, the unbalanced relation of consumption/production was intensified and resulted in decreased self-sufficiency index and increased footprint of food stuffs.
Conclusion
Foodprint for Iran is 0.88 Gha. For the different group of food the highest foodprint (0.43 Gha per person) is for animal products. Population growth together with increasing per capita income has changed food consumption pattern and hence the demand for more food has caused higher pressure on natural resources and more food to be imported. This is the case in most developing countries. Results showed that enhancement of resource use efficiency (water and nitrogen) by 20% higher than the current values could led to improvement of agricultural self-sufficiency and considerable reduction of footprint in all future scenarios. Our results showed that with increasing efficiency of resource use (water and nitrogen) foodprint can be reduced.
Acknowledgement
This research was funded by Vice Chancellor for Research of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, which is hereby acknowledged.

Keywords

• Biocapacity
• Ecological deficit
• Food self sufficiency
• Gini coefficient

20.1001.1.20087713.1397.10.4.6.0

---

References

Andersen, P., Lorch, R.P., and Rosegrant, M.W. 2009. World Food Prospects: Critical Issues for the Twenty First Century. Food Policy Report, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C.

Bagliani, M., Galli, A., Niccolucci, V., and Marchettini, N. 2008. Ecological footprint analysis applied to a sub-national area: The case of the Province of Siena (Italy). Journal of Environmental Management 86: 354–364

Butchart, S.H., Walpole, M., Collen, B., van Strien, A., Scharlemann, J.P., Almond, R.E., Baillie, J.E., Bomhard, B., Brown, C., Bruno, J., Carpenter, K.E., Carr, G.M., Chanson, J., Chenery, A.M., Csirke, J., Davidson, N.C., Dentener, F., Foster, M., Galli, A., Galloway, J.N., Genovesi, P., Gregory, R.D., Hockings, M., Kapos, V., Lamarque, J.F., Leverington, F., Loh, J., McGeoch, M.A., McRae, L., Minasyan, A., Hernandez Morcillo, M., Oldfield, T.E., Pauly, D., Quader, S., Revenga, C., Sauer, J.R., Skolnik, B., Spear, D., Stanwell-Smith, D., Stuart, S.N., Symes, A., Tierney, M., Tyrrell, T.D., Vie, J.C., and Watson, R. 2010. Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328(5982): 1164-8.

De Fraiture, C., Wichelns, D., Rockström, J., Kemp-Benedict, E., Eriyagama, N., Gordon, L.J., Hanjra, M.A., Hoogeveen, J., Huber-Lee, A., and Karlberg, L. 2007. Looking ahead to 2050: scenarios of alternative investment approaches. In: Molden, D. (Ed.), Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture, Water for Food, and Water for Life: A Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture. Earthscan/International Water Management Institute, London/Colombo.

Ewing, B., Goldfinger, S., Oursler, A., Reed, A., Moore, D., and Wackernagel, M. 2009. Ecological Footprint Atlas. Global Footprint Network, San Francisco, California, USA.

Ewing, B., Reed, A., Galli, A., Kitzes, J., and Wackernagel, M. 2010. Calculation Methodology for the National Footprint Accounts, 2010 ed. Global Footprint Network, Oakland.

FAO. 2003. State of the World’s Forests 2003. FAO, Rome, Italy.

FAO. 2006. World agriculture: towards 2030/2050 – Interim report. FAO, Rome, Italy.

FAO. 2012. FAOStat: faostat.fao.org/.

Ferng, J.J. 2002. Toward a scenario analysis framework for energy footprints. Ecological Economics 40(1): 53–69.

Flint, K. 2001. Institutional ecological footprint analysis: A case study of the University of Newcastle, Australia. International Journal of Higher Education 2: 48-62.

Gan, Y., Liang, C., Huang, G., Malhi, S.S., Brandt, S.A., and Mupondwa, F.K. 2012. Carbon footprint of canola and mustard is a function of the rate of N fertilizer. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 17: 58–68.

Gerbens-Leenes, P.W., and Nonhebel, S. 2002. Consumption patterns and their effect on land required for food. Ecological Economics 42: 185–199.

Global Footprint Network. 2010. Ecological Wealth of Nations Global Footprint Network, San Francisco, California, USA.

Global Footprint Network. 2011. The National Footprint Accounts. Global Footprint Network, San Francisco, California, USA.

Hails, C., Loh, J., and Goldfinger, S. 2006. Living Planet Report. 2006. World Wide Fund for Nature International (WWF), Zoological Society of London (ZSL), Global Footprint Network, Gland, Switzerland.

IMAGE-team. 2001. The IMAGE 2.2 Implementation of the SRES Scenarios. RIVM, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.

Khan, S., and Hanjra, M.A. 2008. Footprints of water and energy inputs in food production- Global perspectives. Food Policy 34(2): 130-140.

Kissinger, M. 2013. Approaches for calculating a nation’s food ecological footprint-The case of Canada. Ecological Indicators 24: 366–374.

Kissinger, M., and Rees, W.E. 2010. An interregional ecological approach for modeling sustainability in a globalizing world—reviewing existing approaches and emerging directions. Ecological Modelling 221(21): 2615–2623.

Kitzes, J., and Wackernagel, M. 2009. Answers to common questions in ecological footprint accounting. Ecological Indicators 9: 812–817.

Kitzes, J., Galli, A., Baglianic, M., Barrett, J., Dige, G., Ede, S., Erb, K., Giljum, S., Haber, H., Hails, C., Jolia-Ferrierj, L., Jungwirt, S., Lenzen, M., Lewis, K., Loh, J., Marchettini, N., Messingero, H., Milnek, K., Molesp, R., Monfred, C., Moran, D., Nakano, K., Pyhälät, A., Rees, W., Simmons, C., Wackernagel, M., Wada, Y., Walsh, C., and Wiedmanm, T. 2009. A research agenda for improving national Ecological Footprint accounts. Ecological Economics 68: 1991–2007.

Kitzes, J., Wackernagel, M., Loh, J., Peller, A., Goldfinger, S., and Cheng, D. 2008. Shrink and share: humanity’s present and future Ecological Footprint. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 363(1491): 467-475.

Koocheki, A., Nassiri Mahallati, M., and Khorramdel, S. 2019. Ecological footprint of foodstuff (foodprint) in Iran. Journal of Agroecology in Press. (In Persian with English Summary)

Lenzen, M., and Murray, S.A. 2001. A modified ecological footprint method and its application to Australia. Ecological Economics 37: 229–255.

Li, G.L., Wang, Q., Gu, X.W., Liu, J.X., Ding, Y., and Liang, G.Y. 2008. Application of the componential method for ecological footprint calculation of a Chinese university campus. Ecological Indicators 8: 75–78.

MEA. 2005. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Washington DC, Island Press for WRI.

Moffat, I. 2000. Ecological footprints and sustainable development. Ecological Economics 32: 359–62.

Molden, D., Oweis, T.Y., Steduto, P., Kijne, J.W., Hanjra, M.A., Bindraban, P.S., Bouman, B.A.M., Cook, S., Erenstein, O., Farahani, H., Hachum, A., Hoogeveen, J., Mahoo, H., Nangia, V., Peden, D., Sikka, A., Silva, P., Turral, H., Upadhyaya, A., and Zwart, S. 2007. Pathways for increasing agricultural water productivity. In: Molden, D. (Ed.), Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture, Water for Food, and Water for Life: A Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture. Earthscan/International Water Management Institute, London/Colombo.

Monfreda, C., Wackernagel, M., and Deumling, D. 2004. Establishing national natural capital accounts based on detailed ecological footprint and biological capacity accounts. Land Use Policy 21: 231–246.

Moore, D., Cranston, G., Reed, A., and Galli, A. 2012. Projecting future human demand on the Earth’s regenerative capacity. Ecological Indicators 16: 3- 10.

Samadpour, F. 2006. Assessment of environmental effects and high density urban development with ecological footprint (Case study: district of Elahieh in Tehran city). PhD Thesis, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran. (In Persian with English Summary)

Siche, J.R., Agostinho, F., Ortega, E., and Romeiro, A. 2008. Sustainability of nations by indices: Comparative study between environmental sustainability index, ecological footprint and the energy performance indices. Ecological Economics 66: 628–637.

Tilman, D., Fargione, J., Wolff, B., D’Antonio, C., Dobson, A., Howarth, R., Schindler, D., Schlesinger, W.H., Simberloff, D., and Swackhamer, D. 2001. Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change. Science 292(5515): 281–284.

Van Vuuren D.P., and Smeets, E.M.W. 2000. Ecological footprints of Benin Bhutan, Costa Rica, and the Netherlands. Ecological Economics 34:115–30.

Van Vuuren, D.P., Bouwman, L.F. 2005. Exploring past and future changes in the ecological footprint for world regions. Ecological Economics 52: 43-62.

Wackernagel, M., and Rees, W.E. 1996. Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the earth. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.

Wackernagel, M., and Silverstein, J. 2000. Big things first: focusing on the scale imperative with the ecological footprint. Ecological Economics 32: 391–394.

Wackernagel, M., and Yount, J.D. 2000. Footprints for sustainability: the next steps. Environment, Development and Sustainability 2: 21–42.

Wackernagel, M., White, K.S., and Moran, D. 2004. Using Ecological Footprint accounts: from analysis to applications. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development 3(3/4): 293–315.

White, T.J. 2007. Sharing resources: The global distribution of the Ecological Footprint. Ecological Economics 64: 402-410.

Wiedmann, T., and Lenzen, M. 2007. On the conversion between local and global hectares in Ecological Footprint analysis. Ecological Economics 60: 673–677.

WWF. 2002. Living Planet Report 2002. World Wildlife Found Editor.

WWF. 2012. Living Planet Report 2012: Biodiversity, biocapacity and better choices. Gland, Switzerland.