Evaluarion of Agrophysiological Indices and Yield Performance in Canola/Chickpea Intercropping

Document Type : Scientific - Research

Authors

• Javad Hamzei
• Rahman Davoudian

Bu-Ali Sina University

10.22067/jag.v11i1.65192

Abstract

Introduction:
One of the ecological strategies for increasing of stability is diversity creation by multiple cropping. So, intercropping is an advantage approach for utilization from environmental resource in comparison with monoculture. Intercropping, which is defined as growing two or more species simultaneously in the same field during a growing season, has been considered as an important strategy to develop sustainable production systems, particularly those which aim to limit external inputs such as chemical fertilizer and herbicide. Intercropping is a sustainable cropping practice that has been successfully implemented in agroecosystems. In 79% of biodiversity experiments, biomass production in species diverse systems was on average, 1.7 times higher than in monoculture. Biodiversity enhancement can increase productivity and other ecosystem functions through replacement and complementarity effects. Complementarity effects occur when intercropped plants with complementary traits interact positively to increase productivity, and here genuine yield gains are possible. Thus, it was aimed to evaluate the agrophysiological traits, and yield of canola intercropped with chickpea in different plant densities.
 
Materials and methods:
 Ecophysiological aspects of chickpea-canola intercropping were assessed at the Agricultural Research Station, Faculty of Agriculture (latitude 35◦34'N, longitude 50◦57'E), University of Tehran, during 2014 growing season. The area lies at an altitude of 2010 m.a.s.l. The mean annual rainfall was 256 mm. The mean maximum and minimum temperatures were 27.5°C and 8°C, correspondingly. The soil type of the experimental site was clay loam with pH of 7.78. Irrigation of the entire experiment was done with an overhead sprinkler system on a weekly basis until soil had reached field capacity. Experiment was done as factorial layout bases on a randomized complete block design with three replications and eight treatments. Treatments were sole cropping of rapeseed (60 and 80 plants m-2; 60R and 80R), sole cropping of chickpea (30 and 40 plants m-2; 30C and 40C) and additive intercropping based on combination of the two species (30C+60R, 30C+80R, 40C+60R, 40C+80R). The crops' seeds were sown simultaneously. Leaf chlorophyll reading was measured in the youngest expanded leafs using an SPAD-502 (Minolta). The Photosynthetic CO2 assimilation was measured with a portable leaf chamber and an open-system infrared gas analyzer (IRGA). At the final harvest, plants were cut at ground level and seeds were separated by manual threshing. Grain productivity was used to calculate land equivalent ratio (LER). LER was calculated to measure efficiency of intercropping compared to pure cropping (Banik et al., 2006). SAS vs. 9.1 procedures and programs were used for analysis of variance (ANOVA) calculations. Least significant differences (LSD) test was use for means comparison at 5% probability level.
 
Results and discussion:
Results indicated that chlorophyll reading and protein percentage for canola in intercropping treatment with chickpea were more than its sole cropping. However, photosynthetic rate for both species in sole cropping was more than intercropping. The highest canola grain yield (370.7 g m-2) was achieved at sole cropping with 80 plants m-2 but this treatment had not significant difference with canola sole cropping with 60 plants m-2. Also, chickpea sole cropping in comparison with intercropping treatments had higher grain yield. Although, grain yields of canola and chickpea at sole cropping treatments decreased in comparison with intercropping, but evaluation of land equivalent ratio (LER) confirmed higher advantage of intercropping. At all of the intercropping treatments, LER was higher than one and the highest value for LER (1.46) was revealed at ‘30 plants m-2 chickpea+60 plants m-2 canola’ treatment. In fact, when the value of land equivalent ratio is less than 1, the intercropping affects the growth negatively and yield of crops grown in mixtures but when the value of LER is more than 1, the intercropping favors the growth and yield of the crops. Moreover, the total land equivalent ratio was higher in intercropping system compared to the sole cropping system, indicating the advantage of intercropping over sole cropping in utilizing environmental resources for crop growth.
Conclusion; In general, chickpea/canola intercropping had relative advantage in comparison with sole cropping and increased land use efficiency. So that, results indicated that intercropping of medium density of chickpea (30 plants m-2) with medium density of canola (60 plants m-2) may give better overall yield and income than sole cropping of canola and chickpea.
 Acknowledgments:
 We would like to thank the funding from Faculty of Agriculture, Tehran University, Iran.

Keywords

• Canola
• Chickpea
• grain yield
• Intercropping
• Land equivalent ratio

20.1001.1.20087713.1398.11.1.16.1

---

References

Agegnehu, G., Ghizaw, A., and Sinebo, W. 2006. Yield performance and land use efficiency of barley and faba bean mixed cropping in Ethiopian highlands. European Journal of Agronomy 25: 202–207.

Agricultural Statistics. 2017. Report on the production of crops in the 2016–2017 growing seasons. Ministry of Agriculture – Jahad, Tehran, Iran. (In Persian)

Aminifar, J., Ramroudi, M., Galavi, M., and Mohsenabadi, G.R. 2016. Assessment of cotton (Gossypium spp.) productivity in rotation with intercropping of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.). Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences 18(2): 120-134. (In Persian with English Summary)

Banik, P., Midya, A., Sarkar, B.K., and Ghose, S.S. 2006. Wheat and chickpea intercropping systems in an additive series experiment: Advantages and weed smothering. European Journal of Agronomy 24: 325-332.

Bedoussac, L., and Justes, E. 2010. Dynamic analysis of competition and complementarityfor light and N use to understand the yield and the protein content of a durum wheat–winter pea intercrop. Plant and Soil 330: 37-54.

Brooker, R.W., Bennett, A.E., Cong, W.F., and Daniell, T.J. 2015. Improving intercropping: a synthesis of research in agronomy, plant physiology and ecology. New Phytologist 206: 107–117.

Campiglia, E., Mancinelli, R., Radicetti, E., and Baresel, J.P. 2014. Evaluating spatial arrangement for durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) and sub clover (Trifolium subterraneum L.) intercropping systems. Field Crops Research 169: 49–57.

Crusciol, C.A.C., Nascente, A.S., Mateus, G.P., Pariz, C.M., Martins, P.O., and Borghi, E. 2014. Intercropping soybean and palisade grass for enhanced land use efficiency and revenue in a no till system. European Journal of Agronomy 58: 53–62.

Dutra, W.F., Melo, A.S., and Durta, A.F. 2017. Photosynthetic efficiency, gas exchange and yield of castor bean intercropped with peanut in semiarid Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agricola e Ambiental 21: 106-110.

Dusa, E.M., and Stan, V. 2013. The effect of intercropping on crop productivity and yield quality of oat grain leguminous species pea and lentil cultivated in pure stand and mixtures in the organic agriculture system. European Scientific Journal 21: 69-78.

Ekram, A.M., Sharaan, A.N., and EL-Sherif, A.M. 2010. Effect of intercropping patterns on yield and its components of barley, lupin or chickpea grown in newly reclaimed soil. Egyptian Journal of Applied Science 25: 437-452.

Ehrmann, J., and Ritz, K. 2014. Plant: soil interactions in temperate multi-cropping production systems. Plant and Soil 376: 1–29.

Eskandari, H., and Alizadeh-Amraie, A. 2016. Evaluation of growth and species composition of weeds in maize-cowpea intercropping based on additive series under organic farming condition. Journal of Agroecology 8: 227-240. (In Persian with English Summary)

Eslamizadeh, A., Kashani, A., Siyadat, S.A., Modhej, A., and Lak, S. 2015. Study of soybean forage at different planting dates intercropped with corn. Walia Journal 31: 108-112.

Fatahi Nazad, A., Siadat, A., Esfandiari, M., Moghadasi, R., and Moazi, A. 2013. Effect of phosphorus fertilizer on yield, oil and protein in canola in dryland under soil phosphorus fertility groups. Crop Physiology 18: 83-100.

Franco, J.G., King, S.R., Masabni, J.G., and Volder, A. 2015. Plant functional diversity improves short-term yields in a low-input intercropping system. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 203: 1–10.

Fuente, E.B., Suarez, S.A., Lenardis, A.E., and Poggio, S.L. 2014. Intercropping sunflower and soybean in intensive farming systems.Evaluating yield advantage and effect on weed and insect assemblages. NJAS- Wageningen Journal of Life Science 165: 1–6.

Gao, Y., Duan, A., Qiu, X., Liu, Z., Suna, J., Zhang, J., and Wang, H. 2010. Distribution of roots and root length density in a maize/soybean strip intercropping system. Agricultural Water Management 98: 199–212.

Geren, H., Avcioglu, R., Soya, H., and Kir, B. 2008. Intercropping of corn with cowpea and bean: Biomass yield and silage quality. Biotechnology 22: 4100–4104.

Genard, T., Etienne, P., Diquelou, S., Yvin, J.-C., Revellin, C., and Laîne, P. 2017. Rapeseed-legume intercrops: plant growth and nitrogen balance in early stages of growth and development. Heliyon 3: 1-20.

Ghosh, P.K., Manna, M.C., Bandyopadhyay Ajay, K.K., Tripathi, A.K., Wanjari, R.H., Hati, K.M., Misra, A.K., Acharya, C.L., and Subba Rao, A. 2006. Interspecific interaction and nutrient use in soybean/sorghum intercropping system. Agronomy Journal 98: 1097–1108.

Hamzei, J. 2011. Seed, oil, and protein yields of canola under combinations of irrigation and nitrogen application. Agronomy Journal 103: 1152–1158.

Hamzei, J. 2012. Evaluation of yield, SPAD index, landuse efficiency and system productivity index of barley (Hordeum vulgare) intercropped with bitter vetch (Vicia ervilia). Journal of Crop Production and Processing 2(4):79-92. (In Persian with English Summary)

Hamzei, J., and Babaei, M. 2017. Study of quality and quantity of yield and land equivalent ratio of sunflower in intercropping series with bean. Journal of Agroecology 8: 490-504. (In Persian with English Summary)

Hamzei, J., and Seyedi, M. 2016. Energy use and input–output costs for sunflower production in sole and intercropping with soybean under different tillage systems. Soil and Tillage Research 157: 73–82.

Hamzei, J., and Seyedi, M. 2015. Evaluation of the effects of intercropping systems on yield performance, land equivalent ratio and weed control efficiency. Agriculture Research 4: 202–207.

Hamzei, J., and Seyedi, S.M. 2014. Soil physicochemical characteristics and land use efficiency in cereal-legume intercropping systems. Water and Soil 24: 261-271. (In Persian with English Summary)

Hamzei, J., and Seyedi, S.M. 2012. Determination of the best intercropping combination of wheat and rapeseed based on agronomic indices, total yield and land use equivalent ratio. Crop Production and Processing 2: 109-119. (In Persian with English Summary)

Hamzei, J., Seyedi, M., Ahmadvand, G., and Aboutalebian, M.A. 2012.Effect of additive intercropping on weed suppression, yield and component yield of chickpea and barley. Crop Production and Processing 3: 43-56. (In Persian with English Summary)

Jalilian, J., Modarres Sanavy, S.A.M., and Sabaghpour, S.H. 2005. Effect of plant density and supplemental irrigation on yield, yield components and protein content of four chickpea (Cicer arietinum) cultivars under dry land condition. Journal of Agricultural Science and Natural Resource 12(5): 1-9. (In Persian with English Summary)

Li, L., Tilman, D., Lambers, H., and Zhang, F.S. 2014. Biodiversity and overyielding: insights from below-ground facilitation of intercropping in agriculture. New Phytologist 203: 63–69.

Lin, C.W., Chen, Y.B., Huang, J.J., and Tu, S.H. 2007. Temporal variation of plant height, plant cover and leaf area index in intercropped area of Sichuan, China. Chinese Journal of Ecology 26: 989- 994.

Majnoun Hosseini, N. 2008. Agronomy and Production of Legume. Jihad Daneshgahi Press. Tehran, Iran. 284 pp. (In Persian)

Ngwira, A.R., Aune, J.B., and Mkwinda, S. 2012. On-farm evaluation of yield and economic benefit of short term maize legume intercropping systems under conservation agriculture in Malawi. Field Crops Research 132: 149–157.

Pooramir, F., Koocheki, A.R., Nassiri Mahallati, M., and Ghorbani, R. 2010. Assessment of sesame and chickpea yield and yield components in the replacement series intercropping. Iranian Journal of Fied Crops Research 8: 747-757. (In Persian with English Summary)

Ren, Y., Liuc, J., Wangd, Z., and Zhanga, S. 2016. Planting density and sowing proportions of maize–soybean intercropsaffected competitive interactions and water-use efficiencies on theLoess Plateau, China. European Journal of Agronomy 72: 70–79.

Sarhaddi, M., Zand, E., Baghestani, M.A., and Mohtasebi, R. 2010. Investigating on the effect of different corn planting method on weed management, corn growth indices and yield. Agronomy Journal (Pajouhesh and Sazandegi) 88: 78-86. (In Persian with English Summary)

Vaziri Kateshori, S., Daneshvar, M., Sohrabi, A., and Nazarian Firoz Abadi F. 2014. Effects of foliar application of P, Zn and Fe on grain yield and yield components of chick pea. Journal of Crop Inprovement 15(2): 17-30. (In Persian with English Summary)

Weisany, W., Zehtab-Salmasia, S., Raeia, Y., Sohrabib, Y., and Ghassemi-Golezani, K. 2016. Can arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improve competitive ability of dill + common bean intercrops against weeds? European Journal of Agronomy 75: 60–71.

Yan, S., Du, X., Wu, F., Li, L., Li, C., and Meng, Z. 2014. Proteomics insights into the basis of interspecific facilitation for maize (Zea mays) in faba bean (Vicia faba)/ maize intercropping. Journal of Proteomics 109: 111-124.

Zhang, J., Blackmer, A.M., Ellsworth, J.W., and Koehler, K.J. 2008. Sensitivity of chlorophyll meters for diagnosing nitrogen deficiencies of corn in production agriculture. Agronomy Journal 100: 543–550.

Zhang, F., Shen, J., Zhang, J., Zuo, Y., Li, L., and Chen, X. 2010. Rhizosphere processes and management for improving nutrient use efficiency and crop productivity:implications for China. Advances in Agronomy 107: 1–32.