Effect of Competition on Morphological, Physiological and Productivity Characteristics in Soybean (Glycine max (L) Merrill) and Millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) Intercropping

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• Meisam Namdari
• Rahmat Abbasi
• Hemmatollah Pirdashti
• Faezeh Zaefarian

Depertment of Agronomy, Sari University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Sari, Iran

10.22067/agry.2021.71312.1056

Abstract

Introduction
Intercropping cultivation is an excellent method to increase agricultural productivity per unit area based on environmental mechanisms. In this planting system, it is necessary to select crops with different capabilities in uptake resources and establish a complementary relationship. However, legumes in intercropping cultivation can be used an alternative and sustainable way to increase efficiency. Besides, it is necessary to study the interactions in the above and belowground parts to achieve the mentioned goals. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate inter-specific interactions in millet and soybean intercropping cultures.
 
Material and Methods
A field experiment was conducted for two years (2018-19) at the research farm of Sari agricultural science and natural resources university, Iran (33º, 36ʹ N, 53º, 03ʹ E with 43 m altitude). The experimental design was a randomized complete block with four replications. The experimental treatment was 75% Soybean + 25% Niger, 50% Soybean + 50% Niger, 25% Soybean+75%Niger based on the replacement method and monoculture. This study investigated the agronomic traits, LAI, TDW, nitrogen derived from the atmosphere, and total microbial activity in the soil in different planting ratios.
 
Result and Discussion
The results showed that soybean monoculture had the highest plant height during different stages of growth. Furthermore, with the increase in the share of planting soybean in intercropping cultivation, the shoot height of the millet also increased. Also, unlike the millet, the soybean succeeded in producing more leaf area indexes among different mixed cultivation ratios than monoculture. The leaf area index of millet showed a significant decrease as the proportion of soybean plantings increased. However, despite this decrease, the total dry matter of soybean exhibited a higher percentage increase at various growth stages compared to the decrease in millet yield. As a result, after 60 days of planting, the intercropping cultivation of millet and soybean demonstrated positive complementarity in terms of competition impact. Additionally, the intercropping cultivation showed a higher percentage of nitrogen derived from the atmosphere compared to soybean monoculture. During the study period, the planting ratio of 75% millet and 25% soybean exhibited the highest increase in nitrogen fixation (Ndfa), with average values of 93.84% and 83.85% at 90 days after planting, respectively. Increasing the number of millet sowing rows in the intercropping patterns played a crucial role in intensifying competition with soybeans during the early growth stages and had an impact on the biological activity of soybeans. Moreover, the microbial activity in the soil (at a depth of 0-30 cm) was higher in the different intercropping ratios compared to monocultures of soybean and millet. In addition, soybean and millet monoculture had the highest and lowest grain yields. Among the different intercropping ratios, the 75:25 in 1398 with an average of 4639.77 kg. ha^-1 had the highest grain yield. Besides, the planting ratio of 25:75 and 50:50, with an average of 1.23 and 1.02, respectively, had an LER higher than one. With increasing the share of soybean planting in intercropping, the competitiveness of the plant increases, and the competition ratio of millet was higher than the unit only in the planting ratio of 25:75 (millet-soybean). Therefore, the competitiveness of millet in mixed cultivation is significantly reduced by reducing the share of planting row. Finally, increasing productivity in the 25:75 combinations reduced soybean's competitive dominance, increasing millet grain yield in comparison to expected values and improving total microbial activity.
 
Conclusion
Due to limited growth period, millet had competition played an essential role in increasing total microbial activity and the percentage of nitrogen derived from the atmosphere at a 25:75 planting ratio before the initial reproductive growth. In addition, 25:75 and 50:50 planting ratios reduce soybean's competitive dominance, resulting in enhanced productivity. Finally, the selection of complementary plants based on physiological, morphological characteristics, and competitiveness in intercropping cultivation can be effective in the above and belowground interactions.

Keywords

• Biological nitrogen fixation
• Competition
• LAI
• Total soil microbial activity

Main Subjects

• Ecological approaches in agroecology

---

References

1.  

   1. Adam, G., & Duncan, H.(2001). Development of a sensitive and rapid method for the measurement of total microbial activity using fluorescein diacetate (FDA) in a range of soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 33, 943-951. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00244-3
   2. Ahmadi, K., Ebadzadeh, H.R., Hatami, F., Abd Shah, H., & Kazemeian, A.(2018). Agricultural statistics of the crop year 2016-2017. Ministry of Jahad Agriculture, Tehran, Iran. (In Persian)
   3. Ahmadvand, G., & Hajinia, S.(2016). Ecological aspects study of replacement intercropping patterns of soybean (Glycine max) and millet (Panicum miliaceum L.). Agroecology Journal, 7(4), 485-498. (In Persian with English Summary) https://doi.org/10.22067/jag.v7i4.43744
   4. Bedoussac, L., & Justec, E.(2011). A comparison of commonly used indices for evaluating species interactions and intercrop efficiency: Application to durum wheat–winter pea intercrops. Field Crop Research, 124, 25-36. https://doi.org/1016/j.fcr.2011.05.025
   5. Bitew, Y., Alemayehu, G., Adego, E., Assefa, A., & Moral, M.T.(2019). Boosting land use efficiency, profitability and productivity of finger millet by intercropping with grain legumes. Cogent Food and Agriculture, 5(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2019.1702826
   6. Cardoso, E.J.B.N., Nogueira, M.A., & Ferraz, S.M.G.(2007). Biological N₂ fixation and mineral N in common bean – maize intercropping or sole cropping in southeastern Brazil. Experimental Agriculture, 43, 319-330. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479707005029
   7. Cataldo, D.A., Haroon, M., Schrader, L.E., & Youngs, V.L.(1975). Rapid colorimetric determination of nitrate in plant tissue by nitration of salicylic acid. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 6, 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103627509366547
   8. Cox, W.J., & Cherney, J.H.(2011). Growth and yield responses of soybean to row spacing and seeding rate. Agronomy Journal, 103(1), 123-129. https://doi.org/2134/agronj2010.0316
   9. Crews, T.E., Blesh, J., Culman, S.W., Hayes, R.C., Jensen, E.S., Mark, M.C., Peoples, M.B., & Schipanski, M.E.(2016). Going where no grains have gone before: From early to mid-succession. Agriculture, Ecosystem and environment, 223, 223-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.03.012
   10. Darapuneni, M.K., Angadi, S.V., & Umesh, M.R.(2018). Canopy development of annual legumes and forage sorghum intercrops and its relation to dry matter accumulation. Agronomy Journal, 110(3), 939-949. https://doi.org/2134/agronj2017.06.0301
   11. Diakhate, S., Gueye, M., Chevallier, T., Diallo, N.H., Assigbetse, K., Abadie, J., Diouf, M., Masse, D., Sembene, M., Ndour, Y.B., Dick, R.P., & Lardy, L.C.(2016). Soil microbial functional capacity and diversity in a millet-shrub intercropping system of semi-arid Senegal. Journal of Arid Environments, 129, 71-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2016.01.010
   12. Fehr, W.R., Caviness, C.E., Burmood, D.T., & Pennington, J.S.(1971). Stage of development descriptions for soybean, Glycine max Crop Science, 11(6), 929-931. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1971.0011183X001100060051x
   13. Ganbari, A., Nasiripour, M., & Tavassoli, A.(2010). Evaluation of ecophysiological characteristics of intercropping of millet (Panicum miliaceum) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.). Agroecology Journal, 2(4), 556-564. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.22067/jag.v2i4.8784
   14. Giles,D., Brown, L.K., Adu, M.O., Mezeli, M.M., Sandral, G.A., Simpson, R.J., Wendler, R., Shand, C.A., Menezes, D., Darch, T., Stutter, M.I., Lumsdon, D.G., Zhang, H., & George, T.S.(2017). Response-based selection of barley cultivars and legume species for complementarity: Root morphology and exudation in relation to nutrient source. Plant and Soil, 255, 12-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2016.11.002
   15. Hangria, M., & Mendes, I.C.(2015). Nitrogen fixation with soybean: the perfect symbiosis. In F.J. de Bruijn (Eds). Biological Nitrogen Fixation, Volume 2, First Edition. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. p. 1009-1023.
   16. Hauggaard-Nielsen, H., Gooding, M., Ambus, P., Corre-Hellou, G., Crozat, Y., Dahlmann, C., Dibet, A., Fragstein, P., Pristeri, A., Monti, M., & Jensen, E.S.(2009). Pea–barley intercropping for efficient symbiotic N₂-fixation, soil N acquisition and use of other nutrients in European organic cropping systems. Field Crop Research, 113, 64-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2009.04.009
   17. Herridge, D.F.(1984). Effects of nitrate and plant development on the abundance of nitrogenous solutes in root-bleeding and vacuum extracted exudates of soybean. Crop Science, 25, 173-179. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1984.0011183X002400010041x
   18. Hill, J., & Shimamoto, Y.(1973). A method of analyzing competition with special reference to herbage plants. Journal of Agricultural Science, 81, 77-88. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600058342
   19. Hu, F., Gan, Y., Chai, Q., Feng, F., Zhao, C., Yu, A., Mu, Y., & Zhang, Y.(2016). Boosting system productivity through the improved coordination of interspecific competition in maize-pea strip intercropping. Field Crop Research, 198, 50-60. https://doi.org/1016/j.fcr.2016.08.022
   20. Hunt, R.(1990). Basic growth analysis, plant growth analysis for beginners. British Library Cataloguing in Publication, Salisbury, England p. 118.
   21. Jahan, M., Nassiri Mahallati, M., Amiri, M.B., & Ehyayi, H.R.(2013). Radiation absorption and use efficiency of sesame as affected by biofertilizers inoculation in a low input cropping system. Industrial Crops and Products, 43, 606-611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.08.012
   22. Jiao, Y., Wang, E., Chen, W., & Smith, D.L.(2017). Complex interactions in legume/cereal intercropping system: Role of root exudates in root-to-root communication. BioRxiv 097584: 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1101/097584
   23. Khammar, Z., Dahmardeh, M., Khammari, I., & Mossavi, S.M.(2020). The evaluation of resource efficiency and soil fertility indices in pearl millet (Panucum miliaceum) and peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) intercropping. Agroecology Journal, 11(4), 1511-1525. (In Persian with English Summary) https://doi.org/10.22067/jag.v11i4.76827
   24. Khan, M.A., Chen, Q. Li, W., Zhang, L. Wu, Li, Z., & Lin, W.(2014). Effect of interspecific root interaction on soil nutrition, enzymatic activity and rhizosphere biology in maize-peanut intercropping system. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 51(2), 395-406. https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.13157
   25. King, A.(2014). Multifunctional agriculture: root and nitrogen dynamics in two alternative systems. Graduate Ph.D. Dissertations, Faculty of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Iowa State University, United State.
   26. Kuzyakov,, & Xu, X.(2013). Competition between roots and microorganisms for nitrogen: Mechanisms and ecological relevance. New Phytologist, 198, 656-669. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12235
   27. Layek, J., Shivakumar, B.G., Rana, D.S., Munda, S., Lakshman, K., Das, A., & Ramkrushna, G.I.(2014). Soybean–cereal intercropping systems as influenced by nitrogen nutrition. Agronomy Journal, 106(6), 1933-1946. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj13.0521
   28. Li, X., Mu, Y., & Cheng, Y.(2013). Effects of intercropping sugarcane and soybean on growth, rhizosphere soil microbes, nitrogen and phosphorus availability. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 35, 1113-1119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-012-1148-y
   29. Loreau, M., & Hector, A.(2001). Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments. Nature, 412, 72–76. https://doi.org/ 1038/35083573
   30. Luca, M.J.D., & Hungria, M.(2014). Plant densities and modulation of symbiotic nitrogen fixation in soybean. Scientia Agricola, 71(3), 181-187. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162014000300002
   31. Maikhuri, R.K., Dangwal, D., & Negi, V.S.(2016). Evaluation of symbiotic nitrogen fixing ability of legume crops in Central Himalaya, India. Rhizosphere, 1, 26-28. https://doi.org/1016/j.rhisph.2016.001
   32. McGilchrist, C.A.(1965). Analysis of competition experiments. Biometrics, 21, 975–985. https://doi.org/ 2307/2528258
   33. Mead, R., & Willey, R.W.(1980). The concept of a land equivalent ratio and advantages in yields for intercropping. Experimental Agriculture, 16, 217–228. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479700010978
   34. Mehrani, A., Mosavat, S.A., Shoushi, A.A., Tabatabaei, S.A., Ghasemi, A., Shoushi, A., Tabatabaei, S., Ghasemi, A., Abbasi, M.R., & Zamanian, M.(2013). Bastan the first cultivar of foxtail millet for emergency feed production. Research Achievement for Field and Horticulture Crops, 2(2), 119-128. (In Persian with English Summary) https://doi.org/ 22092/rafhc.2013.100137
   35. Monti,, Pellicano, A., Santonoceto, C., & Pristeri, A.(2016). Yield components and nitrogen use in cereal-pea intercrops in Mediterranean. Field Crop Research, 196, 379-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2016.07.017
   36. Nyawade, S.O., Karanja, N.N., Gachene, C.K.K., Gitari, H.I., Geldermann, E.S., & Parker, M.L.(2019). Short-term dynamics of soil organic matter fractions and microbial activity in smallholder potato-legume intercropping systems. Applied Soil Ecology, 142, 123-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2019.04.015
   37. Oluwaseyi, S.O., Ayangbenro, A.S., Glick, B.R., & Babalola, O.(2019). Plant health: Feedback effect of root exudates-rhizobiome interactions. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 103, 1155-1166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-018-9556-6
   38. Pausch, J, & Kuzyakov, Y.(2018). Carbon input by roots into the soil: Quantification of rhizodeposition from root to ecosystem scale. Global Chang Biology, 24(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13850
   39. Ren, Y., Liu, J., Wang, Z., & Zhang, S.(2016). Planting density and sowing proportions of maize–soybean intercrops affected competitive interactions and water-use efficiencies on the Loess Plateau, China. European Journal of Agronomy, 72, 70-79. https://doi.org/ 1016/j.eja.2015.10.001
   40. Stomph, T., Dordas, C., Baranger, A., de Rijk, J., Dong, B., Evers, J., Gu, C., Li, L., Simon, J., Jensen, E.S., Wang, Q., Wang, Y., Wang, Z., Xu, H., Zhang, C., Zhang, L., Zhang, W., Bedoussac, L., & Werf, W.V.(2020). Designing intercrops for high yield, yield stability and efficient use of resources: Are there principles? Advances in Agronomy. In D.L. Sparks (Ed), Advances in Agronomy. Academic Press, London. p. 1-50.
   41. Tagliapietra, E.L., Streck, N.A., Marques, T.S., Richter, G.L., Silva, M.R., Cera, J.C., Guedes, J.V., & Zanon, A.J.(2018). Optimum leaf area index to reach soybean yield potential in subtropical environment. Agronomy Journal, 110(3), 932-938. https://doi.org/ 2134/agronj2017.09.0523
   42. Unkovich, M., Herridge, D.F., Peoples, M., Cadisch, G., Boddey, B., Giller, K., Alves, B., & Chalk, P.(2008). Measuring plant-associated nitrogen fixation in agricultural systems. Australian Center for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR). p. 136-258.
   43. Ventura, F., Vignudelli, M., Poggi, G.M., Negri, L., & Dinelli, G.(2020). Phenological stages of proso millet (panicum miliaceum) encoded in BBCH scale. International Journal of Biometeorology, 64, 1167-1181. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s00484-020-01891-3
   44. Wang, X., Wu, X., Ding, G., Yang, F., Yong, T., Wang, X., & Yang, W.(2020). Analysis of grain yield differences among soybean cultivars under maize–Soybean intercropping. Agronomy, 10(110), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10010110
   45. Willer, H., & Lernoud, J.(2017). The world of organic agriculture statistics and emerging trends. Research Institute of Organic Agriculture FiBL and IFOAM-Organic International. Frick and bonn, Germany. p. 340.
   46. Willey, R.W., & Rao, M.R.(1980). A competitive ratio for quantifying competition between intercrops. Experimental Agriculture, 16, 117-125. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479700010802
   47. Yang, F., Fan, Y., Wu, X., Cheng, Y., Liu, Q., Feng, L., Chen, J., Wang, Z., Wang, X., & Yong, T.(2018). Auxin-to-gibberellin ratio as a signal for light intensity and quality in regulating soybean growth and matter partitioning. Frontiers Plant Science, 9(56), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00056
   48. Young, E.G., & Conway, C.F.(1942). On the estimation of allantoin by the Rimini-Schryver reaction. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 142, 839–853. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(18)45082-X
   49. Zhang, N.N., Sun, Y.M., Wang, E.T., Yang, J.S., Yuan, H.L., & Scow, K.M.(2014). Effects of intercropping and rhizobial inoculation on the ammoniaoxidizing microorganisms in rhizospheres of maize and faba bean plants. Applied Soil Ecology, 85, 76-85. https://doi.org/1016/j.apsoil.2014.09.008