The Investigation of Plant Yield and Yield Components of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and Weight and Length of Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) as Affected by Application of Nitrogen Levels and Row Intercropping Ratios

Document Type : Scientific - Research

Authors

• Hasan Mohammad
• Ali Nakhzari Moghaddam
• Mehdi Mollashahi
• Masoumeh Naeemi

Department of Plant Production, Gonbad Kavous University, Gonbad Kavous, Iran.

10.22067/agry.2021.68143.1009

Abstract

Introduction
The main goal of conventional agriculture is to maximize both production and income. Intercropping, the agricultural practice of cultivating two or more crops in the same space at the same time, is an old and commonly used cropping practice that aims to match efficiently crop demands to the available growth resources and labor. The most common advantage of intercropping is the production of greater yield on a given piece of land by making more efficient use of the available growth resources using a mixture of crops of different rooting ability, canopy structure, height, and nutrient requirements based on the complementary utilization of growth resources by the component crops. Mixed cropping of cereals with non-cereal plants, in addition to the optimal and fair use of resources such as land and labor, increased productivity per unit area and strengthened total productivity per unit area and time. In mixed cropping of bean and sesame, treatments including 25:75, 50:50 and 75:25 had 1000-seed weight, number of capsules or pods per plant, number of seeds per pod and harvest index were higher than other treatments.
 
Materials and Methods
An experiment was carried out as factorial based on a randomized complete block design with three replications in Gonbad Kavous University farm from 2017-to 2018. The intercropping ratios were in nine levels, including sole crop of chickpea and lettuce, replacement intercropping of 33, 50, and 66% lettuce instead of chickpea, and additive intercropping of 100% cicer + 33, 50, 67, and 100% lettuce and pure nitrogen consumption in three levels of 0, 50 and 100 Kg^-ha. Row distance was 30cm, and row lengths were 3m. The distance between plants in rows was 20 cm for lettuce and 10 cm for chickpeas. The number of rows in sole cropping of chickpea and lettuce was four, 50% lettuce + 50% chickpeas 4 (chickpea-lettuce-chickpea-lettuce), 33% lettuce + 67% chickpea 5 (chickpea-lettuce-chickpea-chickpea–lettuce), 33% chickpea + 67% lettuce 5 (lettuce-chickpea-chickpea- lettuce-chickpea) and in additive treatments was 8 (lettuce-lettuce-lettuce-lettuce-lettuce-lettuce-lettuce-lettuce-) with 15 cm from together. In additive treatments distance of plants was 60, 40, 30, and 20 cm for 33, 50, 67, and 100% increase, respectively. SAS Ver. 9.4 was performed for statistical analysis of data, and the least significant difference test (LSD) at the 5% probability level was employed for mean comparisons.
 
 
 
Results and Discussion
The results showed that the highest dry weight, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per plant, 1000-seed weight, seed weight per plant, and chickpea harvest index were obtained from replacement series of 33% chickpea and 67% lettuce. This was due to reduced external competition, which provided more space for the plant and produced more photosynthetic material. Also, the lowest dry weight, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per plant, seed weight per plant, and 1000-seed weight of chickpea were obtained from an increase of 100% lettuce to chickpea. With increasing nitrogen consumption, plant weight, the number of pods per plant, number of seeds per plant, seed weight per plant, 1000-seed weight and chickpea harvest index, and lettuce plant height and weight were increased. By increasing of nitrogen, plant growth, yield components, and consequently, chickpea seed yield increased.
 
Conclusion
Among the two pea and lettuce plants, lettuce plant weight was higher. The higher weight of lettuce can be attributed to the genetic characteristic of the plant (harvest of the whole plant and high level of water content of the plant). The weight of both species increased with increasing nitrogen consumption. The highest harvest index resulted from the treatment of 50 kg nitrogen per hectare, and the lowest harvest index was obtained from the treatment of non-consumption of nitrogen. Chickpea plant dry weight was reduced due to increasing density which in turn resulted in high competition between plants. Seed weight and yield components of chickpea decreased with increasing density.

Keywords

• Additive intercropping
• Harvest index
• 1000-Seed weight
• Plant density
• Replacement intercropping

20.1001.1.20087713.1401.14.1.9.5

Main Subjects

• Agroecology and Indigenous Knowledge

---

References

Asadi, G.A., Ghorbani, A., Bicharanlou, B., and Bagheri Shirvan, M., 2016a. Influence of different ratios of intercropping on yield and yield components of sweet corn )Zea mays var. saccharata( and eggplant )Solanum melongena L.(. Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production 26)2(: 1-15. )In Persian with English Summary(

Asadi, G.A., Khurramdel, S., and Hatefi Farajian, M.H., 2016b. The effects of row intercropping ratios of chickpea and saffron on their quantitative characteristics and yield. Saffron Agronomy and Technology 4)2(: 93-103. )In Persian with English Summary(

Ahmadvand, G., and Hajinia, S., 2015. Ecological aspects study of replacement intercropping patterns of soybean )Glycine max L.( and millet )Panicum miliaceum L.(. Journal of Agroecology 7)4(: 485-498. )In Persian with English Summary(

Amani-Machiani, M., Javanmard, A., and Shekari, F., 2017. The effect of intercropping patterns on peppermint )Mentha piperita L.( dry biomass yield and essential oil content and faba bean )Vicia faba L.( seed yield. Journal of Crop Production and Processing 7)3(: 79-97. )In Persian with English Summary(

Baharlouie, S., and Fallah, S.A., 2015. Optimization of use of nitrogen for growth and yield of canola and peas intercropping. Journal of Production and Processing of Agricultural and Garden Products 5)17(: 31-41. )In Persian with English Summary(

Borghi, E., Crusciol, C.A.C., Nascente, A.S., Sousa, V.V., and Martins, P.O., 2013. Sorghum grain yield, forage biomass production and revenue as affected by intercropping time. European Journal of Agronomy 51: 130-139.

Ghale-Noyee, Sh., Koocheki, A., Naseri- Poor- Yazdi, M.T., and Jahan, M., 2017. Effect of different treatments of mixed and row intercropping on yield and yield components of sesame and bean. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 15)3(: 588-602. )In Persian with English Summary(

Javanmard, A., Rostami, A., Nouraein, M., and Gharekhani, G., 2016. Agronomical, ecological and economical evaluation of wheat- chickpea intercropping under rainfed condition of Maragheh. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production 26)1(: 19-37. )In Persian with English Summary(

Khorramdel, S., Siahmargue, A., and Mahmoodi, G., 2016. Effect of replacement and additive intercropping series of ajowan with bean on yield and yield components. Electronic Journal of Crop Production 9)1(: 1-24. )In Persian with English Summary(

Kiani, S., Moradi Telavat, M.R., Siadat, S.A., Abdali- Mashhadi, A.R., and Sari, M., 2015. Evaluation of quantitative and qualitative forage yield in barley and fennel intercropping at different nitrogen levels. Journal of Crops Improvement 16)4(: 973-986. )In Persian with English Summary(

Lithourgidis, A.S., Dordas, C.A., Damalas, D.N., and Vlachostergios, D.N. 2011. Annual intercrops: An alternative pathway for sustainable agriculture. Australian Journal of Crop Science 5(4): 396-410.

Mahdavi Marj, T., Ghanbari, A., and Asgharipour, M.R., 2015. Intercropping of barley and ajwan under different levels of manure and chemical fertilizers. Journal of Applied Research in Plant Ecology 1)4(: 63-78. )In Persian with English Summary(

Moradi Talawat, M.R., and Siadat, A.A., 2013. Growth and nitrogen use efficiency response of wheat and wild mustard to increased nitrogen levels. Journal of Crops Improvement 15)2(: 111-124. )In Persian with English Summary(

Nakhzari Moghaddam, A., Salehi Sheikhi, M., Rahemi Karizi, A., and Mohammad Esmaili, M., 2019. The investigation of yield and seed protein of pea cultivars, total yield and LER in intercropping with spinach. Journal of Crops Improvement 21)4(: 435-445. )In Persian with English Summary(

Najafi, S., and Keshtehgar, A., 2014. Effect of intercropping on increase yield. International Research. Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences 8)5(: 549-552. )In Persian with English Summary(

Nasrollahzadeh-Asl, A., and Talebi, M., 2016. Evaluation of sunflower )Heliantus annuus L.( and corn )Zea mays L.( intercropping based on replacement method in Khoy region. Journal of Plant Ecophysiology 8)27(: 204-215. )In Persian with English Summary(

Pahlavanlo, P., Rahimizadeh, M., and Tookaloo, M.R., 2015 .Evaluation of nitrogen use efficiency in intercropping of maize and soybean. Journal of Crops Improvement 17)4(: 967-987. )In Persian with English Summary(

Raftari, E., Nakhzari Moghaddam, A., Mollashahi, M., and Hosseini Moghaddam, H., 2019. The effect application of nitrogen level and intercraoping ratios of pea )Pisum sativum( and lettuce (Lactuca sativa). Iranian Journal of Pulses Research 10)1(: 171-181. )In Persian with English Summary(

Soleimanpur, I., Naderi, R., Bijanzadeh, A., and Emam, Y., 2015. Response of faba bean and pea yield and yield components to cereal-legume intercropping under weed competitions. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research 8)1(: 150-163. )In Persian with English Summary(

Shokati, B., and Zehtab Salmasi, S., 2014. Effect of different intercropping patterns on yield and yield components of dill and ferugreek. Azarian Journal of Agriculture 1)1(: 1-5.

Undie, U.L., Uwah, D.F., and Attoe, E.E., 2012. Effect of intercropping and crop arrangement on yield and productivity of late season maize/soybean mixtures in the humid environment of south southern Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Science 4)4(: 37-50.

Yang, F., Huang, S., Gao, R., Liu, W., Yong, T., Wang, X., Wu, X., and Yang, W., 2014. Growth of soybean seedling in relay strip intercropping systems in relation to light quantity and red: far- red ratio. Field Crops Research 155: 245-253.

Yang, C., Fan, Zh., and Chai, Q., 2018. Agronomic and economic benefits of pea/maize intercropping systems in relation to N fertilizer and maize density. Agronomy Journal 8)4(: 52. 14 p.