Effects of Emergence Time in Nursery and Density of Watergrass (Echinochloa oryzoides) on Competitive Ability with Rice (I. During Season Studies: Growth and Development)

Document Type : Scientific - Research

Authors

• Elmira Mohammadvand ¹
• Alireza Koocheki ²
• Mahdi Nassiri Mahallati ²
• Bizhan Yaghoobi ³

¹ Faculty of Agriculture, University of Guilan, Guilan, Iran

² Department of Agrotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

³ Scientific board member of Rice Research Institute of Iran, Rasht, Iran

10.22067/jag.v11i3.64035

Abstract

Introduction
Investigating the competitive effects of watergrass (Echinochloa oryzoides) as a new-introduced weed species in rice production of Guilan province is of major importance. Consequences of watergrass–rice competition are influenced by each species proportion and density; although could be greatly affected by relative weed seedling emergence time. Furthermore to analyze crop-weed competition, the variation in plant traits that confer competitive ability should be considered. Total dry matter and leaf area as the basic processes in vegetative growth, and plant height, dry weight, and leaf area index as the indications of the relative size, photosynthetic capacity, and productivity, affect competitive ability. Rice traits were associated with competitiveness against weeds included Initial biomass, crop growth rate, leaf area index, and biomass at tillering.
Documenting watergrass and rice differences in growth or structure and plants changes over the course of a growing season contribute to explain the severity of watergrass as a weed in transplanted rice. The objectives of this study were to compare growth characteristics of weed and crop species and investigate growth pattern changes during the growing season.
Materials and Methods
During two years of a field study, the effect of watergrass seedling ages at the time of transplanting (10, 20, and 30 day), and planting proportions of watergrass: rice in each hill ( 0:4, 1:3, 2:2, 3:1, and 4:0, (weed: rice)) were examined as a factorial based on randomized complete block design with three replications. Growth characteristics of rice and watergrass under full-season competition evaluated by six and five destructive samples respectively in first and second years of experiment. At each sampling interval, plants were returned to the laboratory, where the height (by recording the highest extended leaf), the number of tillers (by hand counting total number of tillers) the leaf area index (by measuring the leaf area with an automatic area meter (Li-cor ,LI-2500)), and dry weight of leaves, stems and total plant (by drying at 75 C until a constant weight was reached) were determined separately for each weed and rice species. Sampled plots were not sampled at subsequent harvests. Below-ground biomass was not included in the measurements.
Results and Discussion
According to the results, tiller number, leaf area index, leaf dry weight, and total dry weight of rice increased with increasing seedling number in plant proportions; while final height did not affect. For watergrass, tiller number and total dry weight were also influenced by plant proportion, and increased as weed ratio at the planting proportion was raised. planting proportion caused no significant effect on final height, maximum leaf area index and leaf dry weight of watergrass, and differences among treatments disappeared over the growing season.
At the planting proportion of 1:3 (weed: rice) tiller number of two species was similar in most samples, but was higher for weed than rice at the other mixtures. Maximum leaf area index, leaf maximum dry weight, and total dry weight of watergrass in all planting proportions were higher than rice. Weed seedling ages had significant effects on tiller number, leaf area index, and leaf dry weight of two species, and also total dry weight of watergrass at the first year, but such a effect did not observe in the second year.
Conclusion
Totally based on results, it could be stated that watergrass is more competitive than rice; where the relative aggressiveness of component species was significantly higher for rice than weed. this is probably because of more growth compensation ability of weed through rapid growth and high tillering when it germinate later in the growing season, and because of its stronger competitiveness relative to the rice.

Keywords

• Emergence patterns
• Planting proportion
• Transplanted rice
• Weed seedling age

20.1001.1.20087713.1398.11.3.11.0

---

References

Baki B.B., and Azmi M. 1994. Integrated management of paddy and aquatic weeds in Malaysia: current status and prospects for improvement. Pages 46–77 In: Integrated Management of Paddy and Aquatic Weeds and Prospects for Biological Control. Shibayama H., Kiritani K., and Bay-Peterson J. (Eds.), Taipei, Taiwan: Food and Fertilizer Technology Center for the Asian and Pacific Region, FFTC Book Series No. 45.

Bond J.A., and Oliver L.R. 2006. Comparative growth of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) accessions. Weed Science 54: 121–126.

Bouhache M., and Bayer D.E. 1993. Photosynthetic response of flooded rice (Oryza sativa) and three Echinochloa species to changes in environmental factors. Weed Science 41: 611–614.

Caton B.P., Foin T.C., and Hill J.E. 1999b. A plant growth model for integrated weed management in direct-seeded rice. III. interspecific competition for light. Field Crops Research 63: 47–61.

Chauhan B.S., and Johnson D.E. 2010a. Implications of narrow crop row spacing and delayed Echinochloa colona and Echinochloa crus-galli emergence for weed growth and crop yield. loss in aerobic rice. Field Crops Research 117: 177–182.

Cole Z.A., and Manuel J.S. 1988. Effect of weeds on the yield and yield components of lowland rice affected by nitrogen fertilization. Pest Control Council of the Philippines. Cebu City. 19: 1pp.

Cousens R., Brain P., O’donovan J.T., and O’donovan P.A. 1987. The use of biologically realistic equations to describe the effects of weed density and relative time of emergence on crop yield. Weed Science 35: 720–725.

Fischer A., Ramirez H.V., and Lorenzo J. 1997. Suppression of junglerice [Echinochloa colona (L.) Link] by irrigated rice cultivars in Latin America. Agronomy Journal 89: 516–521.

Fischer A.J., Ramirez H.V., Gibson K.D., and Da Silveira Pinheiro B. 2001. Competitiveness of semidwarf upland rice cultivars against palisadegrass (Brachiaria brizantha) and signalgrass (B. decumbens). Agronomy Joural 93: 967–973.

Gealy D.R., Estorninos Jr. L.E., Gbur E.E., and Chavez R.S.C. 2005. Interference interactions of two rice cultivars and their F3 cross with barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli ) in a replacement series study. Weed Science 53: 323–330.

Gibson K.D., and Fischer A.J. 2001. Relative growth and photosynthetic response of water-seeded rice and Echinochloa oryzoides (Ard.) Fritsch to shade. International Journal of Pest Management 47: 305–309.

Gibson K.D., Fischer A.J., and Foin T.C. 2004. Compensatory responses of late watergrass (Echinochloa phyllopogon) and rice to resource limitations. Weed Science 52: 271–280.

Gibson K.D., Fischer A.J., Foin T.C., and Hill J.E. 2002. Implications of delayed Echinochloa germination and duration of competition for integrated weed management in water-seeded rice. Weed Research 42: 351–358.

Gibson K.D., Fischer A.J., Foin T.C., and Hill J.E. 2003. Crop traits related to weed suppression on water-seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.). Weed Science 51: 87–93.

Gibson K.D., Foin T.C., and Hill J.E. 1999. The relative importance of root and shoot competition between water-seeded rice and watergrass. Weed Research 39: 181–190.

Gibson K.D., Foin T.C., and Hill J.E. 1999. The relative importance of root and shoot competition between water-seeded rice and watergrass. Weed Research 39: 181–190.

Horak M.J., and Loughlin T.M. 2000. Growth analysis of four Amaranthus species. Weed Science 48: 347–355.

Inamura T., Miyagawa S., Singvilay O., Sipaseauth N., and Kono Y. 2003. Competition between weeds and wet season transplanted paddy rice for nitrogen use, growth and yield in the central and northern regions of Loas. Weed Biology and Management 3: 213-221.

Jennings P.R., and Aquino R.C. 1986. Studies on competition in rice: III. the mechanism of competition among phenotypes. Evolution 22: 529–542.

Jennings P.R., and De Jesus J. 1986. Studies on competition in rice: I. competition in mixtures of varieties. Evolution 22: 119–124.

Jennings P.R., and Herrera R.M. 1986. Studies on competition in rice: II. competition in segregating populations. Evolution 22: 529–542.

Knezevic S.Z., Weise S.F., and Swanton C.J. 1994. Interference of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) in corn (Zea mays). Weed Science 42: 568–573.

Luh B.S. 1991. Rice Production. Van Nostrand Reinhold NY,. 439 pp.

Mohammadvand, E., Koocheki, A., Nassiri Mahallati, M., and Shahdi, A. 2013. The effects of seed burial and flooding depths on emergence and seedling growth of watergrass (Echinochloa oryzoides) and barnyardgrass (E. crus-galli). Iranian journal of Field Crops Research 10 (4): 699-708. (In persian with English summary)

Mohammadvand, E., Koocheki, A., Nassiri Mahallati, M., and Shahdi Kumleh, A. 2015a. Investigating the germination response of two Echinochloa species to temperature and photoperiod with emphasis on invasiveness. Iranian journal of Field Crop Science 45 (4): 639-648. (In persian)

Mohammadvand, E., Koocheki, A., Nassiri Mahallati, M., and Shahdi Kumleh, A. 2014. Phenology, Morphology and Yield Characteristics of Two Echinochloa weed Species. Journal of Plant Protection 28: 346-360. (In persian)

Mohammadvand, E., Koocheki, A., Nassiri Mahallati, M., Shahdi Kumleh, A., and Avarseji, Z. 2015c. Competitive relationships of watergrass and barnyardgrass with rice in a replacement series study. Electronic Journal of Crop Protection 8 (1): 205-222.

Mohammadvand, E., Koocheki, A., Nassiri Mahallati, M., Shahdi Kumleh, A., and Avarseji, Z. 2015b. Characterizing the competitive traits of watergrass (Echinochloa oryzoides) as a new-introduced, and barnyardgrass (E. crus-galli) as a common weed species in rice. Journal of Plant Production Research 22 (3): 223-242. (In persian)

Mortimer A.M. 1997. Phenological adaptation in weeds-an evolutionary response to the use of herbicides, Pesticide Science 51: 299–304.

Ni H., Moody K., and Robles R.P. 2000. Oryza sativa plant traits conferring competitive ability against weeds. Weed Science 48: 200–204.

Ni H., Moody K., and Robles R.P. 2004. Analysis of competition between wet-seeded rice and barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) using a response–surface model Weed Science 52: 142–146.

Noda K., Ozawa K., and Ibaraki K. 1968. Studies on the damage to rice plants due to weed competition-effect of barnyardgrass competition on growth, yield, and some eco-physiological aspects of rice plants. Weed Research of Japan 7: 49-54.

Radosevich S.R. 1987. Methods of interactions among crops and weeds.Weed Technology 1: 190–198.

Steckel L.E., and Sprague C.L. 2004. Common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) interference in corn. Weed Science 52: 359-364.

Wang G., McGiffen Jr. M.E., Ehlers J.D., and Marchi E.C.S. 2006b. Competitive ability of cowpea genotypes with different growth habit. Weed Science 54: 775–782.

Yamasue Y., Murayama H., Inoue H., Matasui T., and Kusanagi T. 1997. Growth analysis of rice and Echinochloa oryzicola Vasing. in mixed strands. Journal of Weed Science and Technology 42: 365–371.

Zhu C., Zeng Q., Ziska L.H., Zhu J., Xie Z., and Liu G. 2008. Effect of nitrogen supply on carbon dioxide–induced changes in competition between rice and barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli ) . Weed Science 56: 66–71