Evaluation of Environmental Impacts of Major Agricultural Products of Belherat Rural District of Neyshabour using Life Cycle Assessment

Document Type : Scientific - Research

Authors

• Farzaneh Masumkhani ¹
• Leili Abolhasani
• Sorrur Khorramdel ¹
• Seyyd Ahmad Mohadess ²

¹ Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

² Agricultural and Natural Resources reserach cen

10.22067/jag.v11i3.72459

Abstract

Introduction
Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a common tool for environmentally assessing various agricultural systems based on type and quantity of input consumption and emissions generated during the production. LCA is a method assessing the environmental performance of a given production. The method has been recently developed, providing some detailed information on how to mitigate environmental impacts as well as how to improve sustainability of existing agricultural systems. The aim of this study was to compare environmental impacts of four major crops of wheat, barley, seed water melon and alfalfa in Belherat Rural District of Neyshabur.
Materials and Methods
Using the LCA, four steps including goal definition and scoping, inventory analysis, life cycle impact assessment and integration and interpretation were taken. The system boundary contains production processes, chemical fertilizers, manure, herbicides, pesticides, irrigation (electricity), seed, fuel and other inputs. Functional unit was equivalent to one ton of economic yield, and all inputs, pollutants and average of economic yields were quantified based on one ton of economic yield. Global warming, acidification and aquatic and terrestrial eutrophication were considered as three important impact categories. The coefficient factors (CF) and weighting factors were used to calculate the environmental index (Ecox). A higher Ecox score represents a higher environmental impact.
Results and Discussion
Average economic yields of wheat, barley, seed water melon and alfalfa in Belherat Rural District of Neyshabur were 2.9, 3.1, 0.6 and 5.2 t.ha-1, respectively. The results showed that the global warming potential was a high environmental impact for all four crops including wheat (with 869.4 kg CO2-equiv. per one tonne economical yield), barley (with 694.3kg CO2-equiv. per one tonne economical yield), seed watermelon (with 4947.1 kg CO2-equiv. per one tonne economical yield) and alfalfa (with 2678.9 kg CO2-equiv. per one tonne economical yield), and the aquatic eutrophication potential was the lowest environmental impact such as wheat (with 3.08 kg PO4-equiv. per one tonne economical yield), barley (with 2.4 kg PO4-equiv. per one tonne economical yield), seed watermelon (with 11.1 kg PO4-equiv. per one tonne economical yield) and alfalfa (with 3.3 kg PO4-equiv. per one tonne economical yield), respectively. Among the three emissions of CO2, CH4 and N2O generating the global warming potential, the CO2 had the highest proportion. Fossil fuels and nitrogen-based fertilizers are the main sources of the CO2 emission. Among the four crops, seed water melon generated the highest amount of CO2 – almost five times more than other crops- due to the high use of chemical fertilizers. In general, between these four crops, seed watermelon (Ecox 1.14 per tonne of economical yield) and barley (Ecox 0.07 per tonne of economical yield) were created the highest and lowest environmental impacts, respectively. In producing seed watermelon, acidification potential – with 0.58 ECOX for one tonne of economic yield- was found as the highest environmental impact. This environmental impact of seed watermelon was seven times more than wheat and barely a long with about two times more than alfalfa. Among the three emissions of SO2, NH3 and NOX associated with creating acidification potential, NH3 comprised the largest proportion followed by SO2. Nitrogen- based fertilizers were found the major source of NH3 and SO2 emissions. The high environmental impact of seed watermelon is due to its low economic yield that does not cover its input consumption.
Conclusion
Considering the high contribution of the global warming potential to environmental impacts for these production systems in Belherat Rural District, it is recommended for the study area to manage the use of chemical fertilizers. It is also suggested that effective extension approaches such as conservation agriculture by reducing the consumption of fossil fuels, sustainable nutrition strategies aimed at replacing organic fertilizers with chemical fertilizers are provided to farmers to justify the harmful effects of pollutants on the environment.

Keywords

• Acidification
• Environmental indicator
• Eutrophication
• Global warming
• Sustainability

20.1001.1.20087713.1398.11.3.8.7

---

References

Ahmadi, K., Gholizadeh, H., Ebadzadeh, H., Hoseinpour, R., Abdshah, H., Kazemian, A., and Rafiee, M. 2017. Statistics of Agri-Jihad. http://amar.maj.ir. (In Persian)

Baibordi, M., Malakouti, M.J., AmirMokri, H., and Nafisi, M. 2000. Production and consumption of fertilizers in line with the objectives of sustainable agriculture. Train and equip the human resources department, the Research, Education and Extension Organization, Ministry of Agriculture, Karaj, Iran. (In Persian)

Bennett, R., Phipps, R., and Strange, A. 2006. An application of life-cycle assessment for environmental planning and management the potential environmental and human health impacts of growing genetically-modified herbicide-tolerant sugar beet. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 49: 59-74.

Biswas, W.K., Graham, J., Kelly, K., and John, M.B. 2010. Global warming contributions from wheat, sheep meat and wool production in Victoria, Australia: A life cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner production 18: 1-7.

Brentrup, F., Küsters, J., Kuhlmann, H., and Lammel, J. 2004a. Environmental impact assessment of agricultural production systems using the life cycle assessment methodology: I. Theoretical concept of a LCA method tailored to crop production. European Journal of Agronomy 20: 247-264.

Brentrup, F., Küsters, J., Kuhlmann, H., and Lammel, J. 2001. Application of the Life Cycle Assessment methodology to agricultural production: an example of sugar beet production with different forms of nitrogen fertilisers. European Journal of Agronomy 14: 221-233.

Consoli, F., Allen, D., Boustead, I., Fava, J., Franklin, W., Jensen, A.A., Oude, N., Parrish, R., Perriman, R., Postlethwaite, D., Quay, B., Seguin, J., and Vignon, B. 1993. Guidelines for Life-Cycle Assessment: A Code of Practice.

Cowell, S.J., and Clift, R. 2000. A methodology for assessing soil quantity and quality in life cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production 8: 321-331.

Eckert, H., Breitschuh, G., and Sauerbeck, D. 1999. Kriterien einer umweltverträglichen Landbewirtschaftung (KUL)-ein Verfahren zur ökologischen Bewertung von Landwirtschaftsbetrieben (Criteria of Environmentally friendly land use (KUL)-a method for the environmental evaluation of farms). Journal of Agriculture Biotechnology Research 52: 57-76.

Fallahpour, F., Aminghafouri, A., Behbahani, A.G., and Bannayan, M. 2012. The environmental impact assessment of wheat and barley production by using life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. Environment Development and Sustainability 14: 979-992.

Finkbeiner, M., Inaba, A., Tan, R.B.H., Christiansen, K., and Klüppel, H.J. 2006. The new international standards for life cycle assessment: ISO 14040 and ISO 14044. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 11: 80–85.

Haas, G., Wetterich, F., and Kopke, U. 2001. Comparing intensive extensified and organic grassland farming in southern Germany by process life cycle assessment. Journal of Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 83: 43–53.

Halleux, H., Lassaux, S., Renzoni, R., and Germain, A. 2008. Comparative life cycle assessment of two biofuels ethanol from sugar bett with a preface by Jorg Schweinle. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 13: 184-190.

ISO (International Organization for Standardization). 1997. Environmental management-Life cycle assessment Principles and framework. International Standard ISO 14040 Geneva.

Khorramdel, S., Rezvani Moghaddam, P., and Amin Ghafori, A. 2014. Evaluation of environmental impacts for wheat agroecosystems of Iran by using life cycle assessment methodology. Cereal Research 4: 27-44. (In Persian with English Summary)

Khorramdel, S. 2012. Evaluation of the potential of carbon sequestration and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach in different management systems for corn. PhD Thesis, College of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. (In Persian with English Summary)

Khorramdel, S., Ghorbani, R., and Amin Ghafori, A. 2015. Comparison of environmental impacts for dryland and irrigated barley agroecosystems of Iran by using life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. Journal of Plant Production Research 22: 243-264. (In Persian with English Summary)

Khoshnevisan, B., Rafiee, S., Omid, M., Mousazadeh, H., and Clark, S. 2014. Environmental impact assessment of tomato and cucumber cultivation in greenhouses using life cycle assessment and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Journal of Cleaner Production 73: 183-192. (In Persian with English Summary)

Kronvang, B., Rubak, G.H., and Heckrath, G., Kasmaprapruet, S., Paengjuntuek, W., Saikhwan, P., and Phungrassami, H. 2009. Life cycle assessment of milled rice production: case study in Thailand. European Journal of Scientific Research 30: 95-203.

Labaph Khaniky, M., 2015. Neishabur interactions and the way of silk in Sassanidera. Archaeological Studies 6: 87-97.

Malakouti, M., and Motesharezadeh, B. 1999. The trend of consumption of fertilizers in Iran (goals and policies), Technical Bulletin No. 64, Train and equip the human resources department. Ministry of Agricultural Jihad, Iran. (In Persian)

Mattsson, B., and Wallen, E. 2003. Environmental LCA of organic potatoes. Proceedings of the 26th International Horticultural Congress, ISHS, Acta Horticulturae 90: 1-10.

Meisterling, K., Samaras, C., and Schweizer, V. 2009. Decisions to reduce greenhouse gases from agriculture and product transport: LCA case study of organic and conventional wheat. Journal of Cleaner Production 17: 222–230.

Motesharezadeh, B., and Malakouti, M. 2001. The production and consumption of chemical fertilizers in the country is an important step towards achieving self-sufficiency and sustainable agriculture, Technical Bulletin No. 209, Train and equip the human resources department. Ministry of Agricultural Jihad, Iran. (In Persian)

Motiee Langroudi, H., Faragi Sabokbar, H.A., Ghadiri Masoum., M., and Bakhshi, Z. 2017. Spatial Analysis of Distribution of Rural Settlements in Sabzevar-Neyshabur based on existing ecological resources. Human Geography Research 49: 227-242.

Naderianfar, M., Ansari, H., Ziaie, A., and Davari, K. 2012. Evaluating the groundwater level fluctuations under different climatic conditions in the basin Neyshabour. Journal of Irrigation and Water Engineering Researches 1: 22-37. (In Persian with English Summary)

Najam, A., Poling, J.M., Yamagishi, N., Straub, D.G., Sarno, J., De Ritter, S.M., and Kim, E.M. 2002. From Rio to Johannesburg Progress and Prospects. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 44: 26-38.

Nemecek, T.D., Dubois, O., Huguenin, E., and Gaillard, G. 2011. Life cycle assessment of Swiss farming systems: I. Integrated and organic farming. Journal of Agricultural Systems 104: 217-232.

OECD. 2001a. Environmental Indicators for Agriculture Methods and Results. OECD Publications, Paris, France 3: 409.

OECD. 2001b. Multifunctionality: Towards an Analytical Framework. OECD Publications, Paris, France, pp. 160.

Roy, P., Nei, D., Orikasa, T., Xu, Q., Okadome, H., Nakamura, N., and Shiina, T. 2009. A review of life cycle assessment (LCA) on some food products. Journal of Food Engineering 90: 1-10.

Roy, P.D., Nei, T., Orikasa, Q.X., and Okadome, H. 2009. A review of cycle life assessment (LCA) on some food products. Journal of Food Engineering 90: 1-10.

Schröder, J.J., Aarts, H.F.M., Ten Berge, H.F.M., Van Keulen, H., and Neeteson, J.J. 2003. An evaluation of whole-farm nitrogen balances and related indices for efficient nitrogen use. European Journal of Agronomy 20: 33-44.

Soltani, A., Torabi, B., Galeshi, S., and Zeinali, E. 2012. Analyzing Wheat yield constraints in Gorgan with comparative performance analysis (CPA) method. Journal of Crop Production 4:1-17. (In Persian with English Summary)

Tzilivakis, J., Warner, D.J., May, M., Lewis, K.A., and Jaggard, K. 2005. An assessment of the energy inputs and greenhouse gas emissions in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) production in the UK. Journal of Agricultural Systems 85: 101-119.

Yarmohammadi Barsari, E., Firousi, S., Amin Panah, H. 2016. Environmental impacts of watermelon production in Guilan Province by life cycle assessment. Iranian Journal of Engineering Biotechnology Researches 47: 139-146. (In Persian with English Summary)

Zeijts, H.V, Leneman, H., and Sleeswijk, A.W. 1999. Fitting fertilization in LCA: allocation to crops in a cropping plan. Cleaner Production 7: 69-74.