Role of Rural Women in the Sustainability of Iran's Agroecosystems

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• Anahita Valiollahi Bisheh ¹
• Alireza Koocheki ¹
• Mehdi Nassiri Mahallati ¹
• Minoo Moallem ²

¹ Department of Agrotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. Mashhad. Iran

² Department of Gender and Women's Studies, University of California, Berkeley, USA

10.22067/agry.2021.69949.1040

Abstract

Introduction
Following population growth and increasing demand for food, agricultural systems have been considerably altered across the world. Nonetheless, the majority of these changes have been accompanied with many consequences by reason of focusing on economic growth and ignoring the relation between humans and environmental wellbeing. Thus, it seems that any future increase in food production should be done in a sustainable way which considers various issues. Based on this viewpoint, understanding the importance of diverse women’s roles and addressing gender equality are indisputable preconditions for achieving sustainability in the agriculture sector. Women significantly affect the welfare and sustainability of farmer households through numerous tasks assigned to them by societies. However, women do not have the same rights as men in access to productive resources because of gender-based norms. Although the sustainability of agricultural systems has been evaluated by many researchers, they rarely used gender-based analyzes in their assessments. Hence, we aim to determine women’s participation in various agricultural systems and evaluate the impact of women’s activities on the sustainability of agroecosystems in Iran by using a comprehensive approach.
Materials and Methods
To explore answers to our research goals, a specific questionnaire was utilized, and its validity and reliability were approved by experts and the Cronbach’s alpha test, respectively. We used the purposive sampling method to identify townships and villages and applied the simple random sampling technique to select farmer households. Based on different methods and the results of pre-test surveys, 930 farmer households were considered as the appropriate sample size in this study. Because there are different climatic conditions, agricultural products and subcultures in Iran, this study was carried out in all 31 provinces of Iran to cover differences between regions. The sustainability of farmer households was assessed by applying 15 indicators. Then, scores attained by farmer households were simplified to define three principal thresholds for sustainability: unacceptable (scores≤ 1.5), limited (1.5 <scores≤ 2.5), and good (2.5 <scores). Women’s different activities in market-oriented (male-dominated) agricultural systems were ranked by the Friedman test. The correlation between women’s participation in male-dominated farms and the sustainability of farmer households was determined based on the Tao B. Kendall correlation coefficient. Moreover, the effect of women’s participation in female-dominated agricultural systems (home gardens) on the sustainability of farmer households was assessed by the independent samples t-test.
Results and Discussion
Results disclose that the majority of rural women are pushed back from market-oriented (male-dominated) agricultural systems, especially from cash crop and fruit production systems. Nonetheless, women continue to play a significant role in subsistence (female-dominated) agricultural systems, with 44.1% of them having home gardens. Our findings reveal that farmer households do not experience the good threshold of sustainability, but households whose women have home gardens succeed in gaining higher scores of sustainability than other farmer households. Home gardens, compared with male-dominated farms, put the minimum pressure on the environment because of their reliance on renewable energy inputs. In economic and social dimensions, women meaningfully improve the sustainability of their households by producing different crops and fruits in home gardens. Farmer households with home gardens are able to offer a wider variety of products for sale, make more profit, and even have better savings and liquidity. Home gardens can also increase women’s economic ability, which subsequently improves the food security, health and education of children. Women positively affect the sustainability of farmer households by participating in male-dominated farms. Nonetheless, women’s participation in these systems is not as effective on the sustainability of farmer households as their participation in female-dominated agricultural systems (home gardens).
Conclusion     
Our findings indicate that women’s agricultural activities influence the sustainability of farmer households in a positive way. Therefore, we suggest that experts and policymakers address issues affecting the agriculture sector through a gender lens. Because, the marginalization of rural women from the agriculture sector means the transformation of rural women from economically active actors into consumers with a different lifestyle, which undoubtedly puts a lot of pressure on the economy, both locally and nationally. It will also lead to numerous environmental and social consequences.



 
 

Keywords

• Economic sustainability
• Environmental sustainability
• Gender
• Home garden
• Household
• Social sustainability

---

©2023 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source.

References

1. Abdelali-Martini, M., Amri, A., Ajlouni, M., Assi, R., Sbieh, Y., & Khnifes, A. (2008). Gender dimension in the conservation and sustainable use of agro-biodiversity in West Asia. Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(1), 365-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2007.06.007
2. Alayón-Gamboa, J.A., & Gurri-García, F.D. (2008). Home garden production and energetic sustainability in Calakmul, Campeche, Mexico. Human Ecology, 36(3), 395-407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-007-9151-4
3. 3- Amini, A., & Taheri, A.H. (2017). An analysis on the role-playing of rural women’s economic activities and its dereminants: The case of Simakan rural district in Jahrom country. Iraninan Agricultural Extension and Education Jouranl, 12(2), 37-51. (In Persian with English abstract)
4. Amini, S., Rohani, A., Aghkhani, M.H., Abbaspour-Fard, M.H., & Asgharipour, M.R. (2020). Assessment of land suitability and agricultural production sustainability using a combined approach (Fuzzy-AHP-GIS): A case study of Mazandaran province, Iran. Information Processing in Agriculture, 7(3), 384-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpa.2019.10.001
5. Arabioun, A.A.G., Kalantari, K., Asadi, A.L.I., & Shaaban Ali Fami, H. (2010). Measuring sustainability level of wheat cropping system in Fars province and determining affecting factors. Iranian Agricultural Extension and Education Journal, 5(2), 17-28. (In Persian with English abstract)
6. Asadi, A., Kalantari, K., & Choobchian, S. (2013). Structural analysis of factors affecting agricultural sustainability in Qazvin province, Iran. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology,15(1), 11-22.
7. Asfaw, Z., & Woldu, Z. (1997). Crop associations of home gardens in Welayta and Gurage in Southern Ethiopia. SINET: Ethiopian Journal of Science, 20(1), 73-90. https://doi.org/4314/sinet.v20i1.18092
8. Baden, S. (1999). Gender, Governance and the Feminisation of Poverty. Background paper prepared for UNDP meeting on ‘Women and Political Participation: 21st Century Challenges’, New Delhi. pp. 24-26.
9. Bailey, K.D. (1994). Method of Social Research. Free Press, New York.
10. Barghi, H., Taghdisi, A., Taziki, R., & Nadekhani, Z. (2014). Investigating rural women’s participation in agricultural activities (Case of Northern Astarabad villages of Gorgan). Journal of Spatial Planning, 3(4(11)), 155-174. (In Persian with English abstract)
11. Bäthge, S. (2010). Climate Change and Gender: Economic Empowerment of Women through Climate Mitigation and Adaptation. German Technical Cooperation Agency (GTZ), Eschborn.
12. Birah, A., Srivastava, R., Chand, S., & Ahmed, S.Z. (2016). Role of women in pest management in Andaman. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education, 11(21), 79-82.
13. Bouzarjomehri, K. (2018). Assessment and analysis of rural women’s indigenous ecological knowledge and its use in sustaining natural resources: A case study of villages in the counties of Nishapur and Firuzeh. Journal of Sustainable Rural Development, 2(1), 17-28. https://doi.org/10.32598/JSRD.01.03.270
14. Bouzarjomehri, K., Masoumi Jashni, M., & Jahantigh, H. (2017). Investigating the role of indigenous knowledge and local traditions of women in the production and management of livestock products (Case study: Abu Nasr village, Bavanat city). Indigenous Knowledge of Iran, 3(6), 89-118. (In Persian)
15. Calvet-Mir, L., March, H., Corbacho-Monné, D., Gómez-Baggethun, E., & Reyes-García, V. (2016). Home garden ecosystem services valuation through a gender lens: A case study in the Catalan Pyrenees. Sustainability, 8(8), 718. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8080718
16. Carr, M., & Hartl, M. (2010). Lightening the Load: Labour-Saving Technologies and Practices for Rural Women. Practical Action, Rugby.
17. Chege, C.G., Andersson, C.I., & Qaim, M. (2015). Impacts of supermarkets on farm household nutrition in Kenya. World Development, 72(C), 394-407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.03.016
18. Dehdari, S., Faraji, M., Cheraghian, A., & Ghorbani, M. (2017). The role of rural women traditional knowledge in livestock management-in Imam Zadeh Saleh Kutah village. Rangeland, 11(3), 306-320. (In Persian with English abstract)
19. Doss, C.R. (2014). Data needs for gender analysis in agriculture. In: Quisumbing, A., Meinzen-Dick, R., Raney, T., Croppenstedt, A., Behrman, J., & Peterman, A. (Eds.). Gender in Agriculture. Springer, Netherlands. p. 55-68. https://doi.org/1007/978-94-017-8616-4_3
20. Doss, C.R., & Morris, M.L. (2000). How does gender affect the adoption of agricultural innovations? The case of improved maize technology in Ghana. Agricultural Economics, 25(1), 27-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2001.tb00233.x
21. Fan, L., Liu, G., Wang, F., Geissen, V., Ritsema, C.J., & Tong, Y. (2013). Water use patterns and conservation in households of Wei River Basin, China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 74(C), 45-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.02.017
22. (2011). The State of Food and Agriculture: Women in Agriculture-Closing the Gender Gap for Development. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
23. (2015). Sustainability Assessment of Food and Agriculture Systems: Smallholders App. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
24. (2020). The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World. Available at: http://www.fao.org/3/ca9692en/online/ca9692en.html# (verified 31 March 2021)
25. , IFAD., UNICEF., WFP., & WHO. (2019). The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2019. Safeguarding against Economic Slowdowns and Downturns. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
26. Fattori, T. (2005). Organizing Afghan Women to Generate Income from Poultry. Rebuilding Agricultural Markets Program (RAMP) in Afghanistan Food and Agriculture organization (FAO). Chemonics International Inc, Washington D.C.
27. Foltz, J., Larson, B.A., & Lopez, R. (2000). Land Tenure, Investment, and Agricultural Production in Nicaragua. Development discussion paper No. 738. Institute for International Development, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
28. Galhena, D.H., Freed, R., & Maredia, K.M. (2013). Home gardens: A promising approach to enhance household food security and wellbeing. Agriculture & Food Security, 2(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/2048-7010-2-8
29. Garibaldi, L.A., Gemmill-Herren, B., D’Annolfo, R., Graeub, B.E., Cunningham, S.A., & Breeze, T.D. (2017). Farming approaches for greater biodiversity, livelihoods, and food security. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 32(1), 68-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.10.001
30. Haile, M., Abay, F., Waters-Bayer, A., & Reij, C. (2001). Joining forces to discover and celebrate local innovation in land husbandry in Tigray, Ethiopia. In: Reij, C., & Waters-Bayer, A. (Eds.). Farmer Innovation in Africa: A source of Inspiration for Agricultural Development. Routledge, London. p. 58-73.
31. Hejazi, Y., Mirtorabi, M.S., & Hosseini, S.M. (2011). Factors influencing rural women’s participation in post-harvest activities: A case study (Asara, Karaj). Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 42-2(1), 117-128. (In Persian with English abstract)
32. Iannotti, L., Cunningham, K., & Ruel, M. (2009). Improving Diet Quality and Micronutrient Nutrition: Homestead Food Production in Bangladesh. IFPRI discussion paper. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C.
33. Jackson, C. (1993). Doing what comes naturally? Women and environment in development. World Development, 21(12), 1947-1963. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(93)90068-K
34. Karami, E., & Mansoorabadi, A. (2008). Sustainable agricultural attitudes and behaviors: A gender analysis of Iranian farmers. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 10(6), 883-898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-007-9090-7
35. Karimi, V., Karami, E., & Keshavarz, M. (2018). Climate change and agriculture: Impacts and adaptive responses in Iran. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 17(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61794-5
36. Kariuki, J. (2019). Gender and livestock. In: Ferranti, P., Berry, E.M., & Anderson, J.R. (Eds.). Encyclopedia of Food Security and Sustainability. Elsevier, p. 481–487.
37. Kremen, C., & Miles, A. (2012). Ecosystem services in biologically diversified versus conventional farming systems: Benefits, externalities, and trade-offs. Ecology and Society, 17(4), 40. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-05035-170440
38. Kerr, R.B., Snapp, S., Chirwa, M., Shumba, L., & Msachi, R. (2007). Participatory research on legume diversification with Malawian smallholder farmers for improved human nutrition and soil fertility. Experimental Agriculture, 43(4), 437-453. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479707005339
39. Kumar, B.M., & Nair, P.R. (2004). The enigma of tropical homegardens. Agroforestry Systems, 61(1-3), 135-152. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2424-1_10
40. Lawal, J., & Muyiwa, A. (2009). Food security and socioeconomic characteristics of cocoa farming households in Nigeria: Support through agricultural biotechnology. Journal of Applied Biosciences, 20, 1166-1171.
41. Lundberg, S.J., Pollak, R.A., & Wales, T.J. (1997). Do husbands and wives pool their resources? Evidence from the United Kingdom child benefit. Journal of Human Resources, 32(3), 463-480. https://doi.org/10.2307/146179
42. Meinzen-Dick, R., Behrman, J.A., Pandolfelli, L., Peterman, A., & Quisumbing, A.R. (2014). Gender and social capital for agricultural development. In: Quisumbing, A., Meinzen-Dick, R., Raney, T., Croppenstedt, A., Behrman, J., & Peterman, A. (Eds.). Gender in Agriculture. Springer, Netherlands. p. 235-266. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8616-4_10
43. Mitchell, R., & Hanstad, T. (2004). Small Homegarden Plots and Sustainable Livelihoods for the Poor. LSP working paper No. 11. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
44. Mohammadi, A., Tabatabaeefar, A., Shahin, S., Rafiee, S., & Keyhani, A. (2008). Energy use and economical analysis of potato production in Iran a case study: Ardabil province. Energy Conversion and Management, 49(12), 3566-3570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2008.07.003
45. Neumayer, E., & Plümper, T. (2007). The gendered nature of natural disasters: The impact of catastrophic events on the gender gap in life expectancy, 1981–2002. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 97(3), 551-566. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2007.00563.x
46. Njuki, J., Kaaria, S., Chamunorwa, A., & Chiuri, W. (2011). Linking smallholder farmers to markets, gender and intra-household dynamics: Does the choice of commodity matter? European Journal of Development Research, 23(3), 426-443. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2011.8
47. Nouri, M. (2016). An analysis on the extent of change in participation of rural women in agriculture sector: A case study of rural areas of Torbat-e-Jam county of Iran. Village and Development, 19(2), 131-153. (In Persian with English abstract)
48. Pionetti, C. (2006). Seed Diversity in The Drylands: Women and Farming in South India. International Institute for Environment and Development, London.
49. Pishgar-Komleh, S., Sefeedpari, P., & Rafiee, S. (2011). Energy and economic analysis of rice production under different farm levels in Guilan province of Iran. Energy, 36(10), 5824-5831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.08.044
50. Porbar, Z., Moghani, B., Hosseini, S.F., & Ejtemai, B. (2014). Explaining the role of rural women in agricultural activities. New Attitudes in Human Geography, 6(2), 69-86. (In Persian)
51. Quisumbing, A.R., Meinzen-Dick, R., Raney, T.L., Croppenstedt, A., Behrman, J.A., & Peterman, A. (2014). Closing the knowledge gap on gender in agriculture. In: Quisumbing, A., Meinzen-Dick, R., Raney, T., Croppenstedt, A., Behrman, J., & Peterman, A. (Eds.). Gender in Agriculture. Springer, Netherlands. p. 3-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8616-4
52. Rafiee, S., Avval, S.H.M., & Mohammadi, A. (2010). Modeling and sensitivity analysis of energy inputs for apple production in Iran. Energy, 35(8), 3301-3306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.04.015
53. Ranasinghe, T.T. (2009). Manual of Low/No-Sspace Agriculture Cum Family Business Gardens. RUAF Foundation, International Water Management Institute.
54. Ravon, L. (2014). Resilience in Times of Food Insecurity: Reflecting on the Experiences of Women’s Organizations. Oxfam Canada, Ottawa.
55. Rezaei, M.E., Barmaki, M., & Veisi, H. (2018). Sustainability assessment of potato fields using the DEXi decision support system in Hamadan province, Iran. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 17(11), 2583-2595. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(18)62107-0
56. Saito,A., Mekonnen, H., & Spurling, D. (1994). Raising the Productivity of Women Farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa. World Bank discussion paper No. WDP 230. World Bank, Washington, D.C.
57. Smith, P. (2013). Delivering food security without increasing pressure on land. Global Food Security, 2(1), 18-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2012.11.008
58. Sonaiya, E., Branckaert, R., & Gueye, E. (1999). Research and development options for family poultry. In: Gueye, E.F. (Ed). The First INFPD/FAO Electronic Conference on the Scope and Effect of Family Poultry Research and Development.
59. Thornton, P.K., Kruska, R.L., Henninger, N., Kristjanson, P.M., Reid, R.S., Atieno, F., Odero, A.N., & Ndegwa, T. (2002). Mapping Poverty and Livestock in the Developing World. International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi.
60. Thomas, D. (1997). Incomes, expenditures and health outcomes: Evidence on intrahousehold resource allocation. In: Haddad, , Hoddinott, J., & Alderman, H. (Eds.). Intrahousehold Resource Allocation in Developing Countries. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. p. 142-165.
61. Torquebiau, E. (1992). Are tropical agroforestry home gardens sustainable? Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 41(2), 189-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8809(92)90109-O
62. Trinh, L.N., Watson, J.W., Hue, N.N., De, N.N., Minh, N., Chu, P., Sthapit, B.R., & Eyzaguirre, P.B. (2003). Agrobiodiversity conservation and development in Vietnamese home gardens. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 97(1-3), 317-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(02)00228-1
63. UN. (2016). Official Homepage United Nations (UN): Sustainable Development Goals. Available at Web site https://sdgs.un.org/goals (verified 31 March 2021).
64. UN Women, UNDP., UNEP., and World Bank. (2015). The Cost of the Gender Gap in Agricultural Productivity in Malawi, Tanzania, and Uganda. World Bank, Washington, D.C.
65. Van de Vliert, E., Huang, X., & Parker, P.M. (2004). Do colder and hotter climates make richer societies more, but poorer societies less, happy and altruistic? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(1), 17-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00021-5
66. Veisi, H., Khoshbakht, K., & Sabahi, H. (2013). A participatory assessment of agro-ecosystem sustainability in abesard, iran. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 11(1), 52-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2012.676797
67. Wanasundera, L. (2006). Rural women in Sri Lanka’s post conflict rural economy. Rap Publication, 13, 7-43.
68. WFP. (2021). These are the Top 6 Reasons Women are Hungrier than Men Today. Available at Web site https://www.wfpusa.org/articles/women-in-crisis-top-ways-women-are-hungrier/ (verified 31 March 2021).
69. Wilson, R.T. (1995). Livestock Production Systems (The Tropical Agriculturalist Macmillan/CTA). Macmillan Education, London.
70. World Bank. (2020). COVID-19 to Add as Many as 150 Million Extreme Poor by 2021. Available at: https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2020/10/07/covid-19-to-add-as-many-as-150-million-extreme-poor-by-2021 (verified 31 March 2021)
71. World Bank. (2021). Employment in Agriculture, Female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SL.AGR.EMPL.FE.ZS (verified 31 March 2021)
72. World Bank., FAO., & IFAD. (2009). Gender in Agriculture Sourcebook. Agriculture and Rural Development. World Bank, Washington, D.C.
73. World Bank and ONE Campaign. (2014). Levelling the Field: Improving Opportunities for Women Farmers in Africa. World Bank, Washington, D.C.
74. Yang, Y.E., Passarelli, S., Lovell, R.J., & Ringler, C. (2018). Gendered perspectives of ecosystem services: A systematic review. Ecosystem Services, 31, 58-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.03.015
75. Yisehak, K. (2008). Gender responsibility in smallholder mixed crop–livestock production systems of Jimma zone, South West Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 20(11), 12.
76. Zhang, W., Ricketts, T.H., Kremen, C., Carney, K., & Swinton, S.M. (2007). Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture. Ecological Economics, 64(2), 253-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.02.024