اثر سطوح مختلف کود مرغی پلیت شده و کود شیمیایی بر عملکرد دانه و کیفیت علوفه ذرت (Zea mays L.)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه مهندسی تولید و ژنتیک گیاهی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران.

2 گروه علوم دامی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران.

چکیده

به‌منظور بررسی اثر سطوح مختلف کود مرغی پلیت شده و کود شیمیایی بر کیفیت علوفه و عملکرد دانه ذرت (Zea mays L.)، آزمایش حاضر در قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار انجام شد. تیمارهای آزمایش شامل شاهد (عدم مصرف کود)، 1250 کیلوگرم کود مرغی پلیت شده، 1250 کیلوگرم کود مرغی پلیت شده + 25 درصد کود شیمیایی (کود اوره، کود سوپر فسفات تریپل و سولفات پتاسیم)، 1250 کیلوگرم کود مرغی پلیت شده + 50 درصد کود شیمیایی، 2500کیلوگرم کود مرغی پلیت شده، 2500 کیلوگرم کود مرغی پلیت شده + 25 درصد کود شیمیایی، 2500 کیلوگرم کود مرغی پلیت شده + 50 درصد کود شیمیایی، 5000 کیلوگرم کود مرغی پلیت شده، 5000 کیلوگرم کود مرغی پلیت شده + 25 درصد کود شیمیایی، 5000 کیلوگرم کود مرغی پلیت شده + 50 درصد کود شیمیایی و 100 درصد کود شیمیایی بود. نتایج نشان داد که تیمارهای تلفیقی موجب بهبود عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد به‌ویژه ارتفاع بوته، وزن بلال، تعداد دانه در ردیف، عملکرد دانه، عملکرد بیولوژیک و شاخص برداشت شدند. بیشترین ارتفاع بوته (2/241 سانتی‌متر)، تعداد بلال در بوته (1/2 بلال)، وزن هزار دانه (99/26 گرم بر مترمربع)، عملکرد دانه (76/12 تن در هکتار) و عملکرد بیولوژیک (42/26 تن در هکتار) در تیمار 5000 کیلوگرم کود مرغی پلیت شده + 50 درصد کود شیمیایی توصیه شده مشاهده گردید. بیشترین درصد پروتئین سیلاژ علوفه (58/12 درصد) و خاکستر سیلاژ (32/10 درصد) در تیمار 2500 کیلوگرم کود مرغی پلیت شده + 50 درصد کود شیمیایی توصیه شده مشاهده گردید. نتایج حاصل از اندازه‌گیری‌ها نشان داد که تیمارهای کود تلفیقی در مقایسه با تیمار کود شیمیایی خالص و کود مرغی خالص دارای برتری بودند و سبب بهبود عملکرد و کیفیت محصول ذرت گردید. باتوجه به نتایج حاصل از آزمایش حاضر ترکیب کود شیمیایی با مقادیر متفاوت کود مرغی، موجب کاهش مصرف کودهای شیمیایی و بهبود عملکرد و کیفیت ذرت شد. این امر می‌تواند علاوه‌بر صرفه‌جویی در مصرف کود و هزینه‌های ناشی از آن، کاهش اثرات مخرب زیست‌محیطی را نیز سبب شود و وضعیت خاک از لحاظ حاصلخیزی درازمدت و درصد ماده آلی خاک بهبود پیدا کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Effect of Different Levels of Pelleted Poultry Manure and Chemical Fertilizer on Fodder Quality and Maize (Zea mays L.) Grain Yield

نویسندگان [English]

  • Sara Darabi 1
  • Gholamreza Heidari 1
  • Shiva Khalesro 1
  • Hossein Jahani Azizabadi 2
1 Department of Production Engineering and Plant Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran
2 Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction
Maize (Zea mays L.) ranks first in terms of forage production among forage plants by producing about 490 million tons of fresh and silage forage in the world. Chemical fertilizers are used to increase crop yields and provide human food, but reduce soil organic matter content and, in the long run, pose a serious environmental risk, resulting in contamination of arable soils and surface and groundwater. Organic manures reduce the harmful effects of chemical fertilizers by producing humus and increasing the activity of the soil microbial community. Utilization of non-chemical resources such as farmyard manure in combination with chemical fertilizers can lead to soil fertility and increase yield and crop quality because combined fertilizer systems can provide most of the plant's nutritional needs by increasing the absorption efficiency of nutrients in crops. Considering the importance of organic manures and their combination with chemical fertilizers, this experiment was conducted in order to investigate the effects of different levels of poultry manure, chemical fertilizer, and their combination on yield, yield components, and maize forage quality.
Materials and Methods
The research was carried out in the research farm of Kurdistan University located in Dehgolan County, Kurdistan Province, Iran in the crop year 2017-2018. The experiment was performed in the form of randomized complete blocks with three replications. Experimental treatments included different levels of pelleted poultry manure in combination with chemical fertilizers: Figure 2. T1: no fertilizer (control), T2: 1250 kg of poultry manure + zero kg of recommended chemical fertilizer, T3: 1250 kg of poultry manure + 25% of the recommended chemical fertilizer, T4: 1250 kg of poultry manure + 50% recommended chemical fertilizer, T5: 2500 kg of poultry manure + zero kg of recommended chemical fertilizer, T6: 2500 kg of poultry manure + 25% of recommended chemical fertilizer, T7: 2500 kg of poultry manure + 50% Recommended chemical fertilizer, T8: 5000 kg of poultry manure + 0 kg of recommended chemical fertilizer, T9: 5000 kg of poultry manure + 25% of recommended chemical fertilizer, T10: 5000 kg of poultry manure + 50% of chemical fertilizer Recommended, T11: 100% recommended chemical fertilizer. In this experiment, traits such as plant height, 1000-seed weight, biological and grain yield, seed nitrogen, starch, oil contents and forage quality were measured.
Results and Discussion
The results of the analysis of variance showed that the plant height, grain yield, biological yield, grain nitrogen, starch and oil contents, and oil yield were affected by fertilizer treatments at a probability level of 1%. The index harvest of maize was significant at the level of 5% probability. The number of plants per square meter and 1000-seed weight were not affected by fertilizer treatment. The highest plant height (241.2 cm), number of ears per plant (1.2 ears), 1000-seed weight (26.99 g.m-2), seed yield (12.76 tons per hectare) and biological yield (26.42 tons per hectare) were observed in the treatment of 5000 kg of plated chicken manure + 50% of the recommended chemical fertilizer. The highest percentage of fodder silage protein (12.58%) and silage ash (10.32%) was observed in the treatment of 2500 kg of plated chicken manure + 50% of the recommended chemical fertilizer. The highest percentage of insoluble fibers in neutral detergent was observed in the T6 and T8 treatments, and the lowest percentage of insoluble fibers in neutral detergents was observed in the T10 treatment. The highest and lowest percentages of insoluble fibers in acidic detergent were in the T2, T4, and T3 treatments, respectively. According to the results of the present experiment, the combination of chemical fertilizer with different amounts of chicken manure has reduced the consumption of chemical fertilizers, and in addition to saving on the consumption of fertilizer and the resulting costs, the harmful effects on the environment have also been reduced, and the condition of the soil in terms of fertility in the long term, the percentage of soil organic matter will improve.
Conclusion
 The results of the experiment showed that combined fertilizer treatments were superior compared to pure chemical fertilizer and pure poultry manure treatments, improved the yield and yield components of maize and caused a reduction in chemical fertilizers consumption. Chemical fertilizer treatment provided acceptable yield only at high levels.
 



 
 



 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Ash
  • Crude Protein
  • Forage maize
  • Harvest Index
  • Starch percentage

©2023 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source.

مراجع

  1. Agyenim-Boateng, S., Zickermann, J., & Kornahrens, M. (2016). Poultry manure effect on growth and yield of maize. West African Journal of Applied Ecology, 9(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/4314/wajae.v9i1.45682
  2. AO (1999). In: Cunnif, P. Official methods of analysis of the association of official analytical chemists, 16th Ed. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
  3. Armstrong, K.L., Albrecht, K.L., Lauer, J.G., & Riday, H. (2018). Intercropping corn with lablab bean, velvet bean, and scarlet runner bean for forage. Crop Science, 48, 371-379. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2007.04.0244
  4. Ayeni, L.S., & Adetunji, M.T. (2010). Integrated application of poultry manure and mineral fertilizer on soil chemical properties, nutrient uptake, yield and growth components of maize. Nature and Science, 8(1), 60-67.
  5. Ayub, M., Nadeem, M.A., Sharar, M.S., & Mahmood, N. (2017). Response of maize (Zea mays) fodder to different levels of nitrogen and phosphorus. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 1(4), 352-354. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2002.352.354
  6. Bhattacharyya, R., Kundu, S., Prakash, V., & Gupta, H.S. (2018). Sustainability under combined application of mineral and organic fertilizers in a rain fed soybean-wheat system of the Indian Himalayas. European Journal of Agronomy 28, 33-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2007.04.006
  7. Bostick, W.M.N., Bado, V.B., Bationo, A., Solar, C.T., Hoogenboom, G., & Jones, J.W. (2007). Soil carbon dynamics and crop residue yields of cropping systems in the Northern Guinea Savanna of Burkina Faso. Soil and Tillage Research, 93(7), 138-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2006.03.020
  8. Cheema, M.A., W. Farhad, M.F., Saleem, H.Z., Khan, M.A., Vahid, F., Rasul., & Hammad. H.M. (2010). Nitrogen management strategies for sustainable maize production. Crop and Environment, 1(1), 49-52.
  9. Contreras-Govea, F.E., Muck, R.E., Armstrong, K.L., & Albrecht, A. (2009). Nutritive value of corn silage in mixture with climbing beans. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 150, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2008.07.001
  10. Curran, B., & Posch, J. (2010). Agronomic management of silage for yield and quality: Silage cutting height. Crop Insights 10 (2): 145-155.
  11. Dilshad, M.D., Lone, M.I., Jilani, G., Azim-Malik, M., Yousaf, M., Khalid, R. & Shamin, F. (2010). Integrated nutrient management (IPNM) on maize under rainfed condition. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 9, 896-901. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2010.896.901
  12. Djilan, G., & Mourad, S. (2013). Influence of organic manure on the vegetative growth and tuber production of potato (Solanum tuberosum) in a Sahara Desert region. International Journal of Agricultural and Crop Research, 5 (22), 2724-2731.
  13. Eyni, B., & Bashtani, B. (2016). Survey of nutritive value and degradability of sorghum silage from first and second cutting of forage. Research on Animal Production 7(16), 142-136. (In Persian with English abstract). https://www.doi.org/10.29252/rap.7.14.142
  14. F (2021). FAOSTAT. Statistical of crop production. Avilable at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data.
  15. Farhad, W., Saleem, M. f., Cheema, M.A., & Hammad, H.M. (2009). Effect of poultry manure levels the productivity of spring maize (Zea mays). Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 19(3), 122-125.
  16. Fernandez-Luqueno, F., Reyes-Varela, V., Martinez-Suarez, C., Salomon-Hernandez, G., Yanez-Meneses, J., Ceballos-Ramirez, M., & Dendooven, L. (2010). Effect of different nitrogen sources on plant characteristics and yield of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Bioresource Technology, 101, 396-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.07.058
  17. Ghasemi, A., Ghanbari, A., Fakheri, B.A., & Fanaie, H.R. (2018). Effect of different tillage management on maize forage and grain quality and quantity under the influence of different sources of organic and chemical fertilizers. Journal of Agroecology 10(2), 490-50 (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/jag.v10i2.59988
  18. Habibi, S., & Majidian, M. (2014). Effect of different levels of nitrogen fertilizer and vermicompost on yield and quality of sweet corn (Zea mays Hybrid Chase). Journal of Crop Production and Processing, 11(4), 143-155. (In Persian with English abstract)
  19. Hirzel, J., Donnay, D., Fernandez, C., Meier, S., Lagos, O., & Mejias-Barrera, P. (2018). Evolution of nutrients andsoil chemical properties of seven organic fertilizers in two contrasting soils under controlled conditions. Chilean Journal of Agricultural and Animal Sciences, 34, 77–88. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0719-38902018005000301
  20. Hirzel, J., Matus, I., Novoa, F., & Walter, I. (2007). Effect of poultry litter on silage maize (Zea mays) production and nutrient uptake. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 5, 102-109. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2007051-226
  21. Jahanzad, E., Sadeghpoura, A., Lithourgidisb, A.S., Hashemi, M., Lithourgidis, A.M., Esmaeilic, A., & Hosseinic, M.B. (2014). Forage yield and quality of barley-annual medic intercrops in semi-arid environments. International Journal of Plant Production, 8(1), 1735-8043.
  22. Javanmard, A., & Shekari, F. (2016). Improvement of seed yield, its components and oil content of sunflower (Helianthus annuus) by applications of chemical and organic fertilizers. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology, 37(1), 35-56. (In Persian with English abstract)
  23. Judith, N., Chantigny, M., Dayegamiye, A., & Laverdiere, M. (2009). Dairy cattle manure improves soil productivity in low residue rotation systems. Agronomy Journal, 101, 207-214. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2008.0142
  24. Kariminejad, M., Pazoki, A., & Fooladi Toroghi, (2017). Effect of methods and amounts of complete fertilizer using on yield and yield components of corn variety in Shahr-e-Rey region. Agronomy and Plant Breeding, 12 (4), 15-33. (In Persian with English abstract)
  25. Maghsudi, E., Ghalavand, A., & Aghaalikhan, M. (2014). The effect of different levels of fertilizer (organic, biological and chemical) on morphological traits and yield of maize single cross hybrid 704. Applied Field Crops Reaserch, 27(104): 129-135. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22092/aj.2014.101820
  26. McCready, R.M., Guggolz, J., Silviera, V., & Owens, H.S. (1950). Determination of starch and amylase in Analytical Chemistry, 22(9): 1156–1158.
  27. Modirshanechi, M. (2015). Production and management of forage plants. First edition, Astan Ghadi Razavi Publications, Mashhad, 448 pp.
  28. Mojab Ghasroddashti, A., Maghsoudi, E., Behzadi, Y., & Fereidooni, M.J. (2017). The effects of different sources of nitrogen on yield and yield component of sweet corn (Zea mays saccharata). Journal of Agroecology, 9(1), 171- 184. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/jag.v9i1.52309
  29. Muhammet, (2019). The effects of poultry manure and inorganic fertilizer applications on nitrogen and irrigation water use efficiency in forage corn cultivars. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gazi Osman Pasa University, 32(1), 104-111. https://doi.org/10.13002/jafag767
  30. Nelson, D. & Sommers, L. (1973). Determination of total nitrogen in plant material. Agronomy Journal, 65(1), 109-112.
  31. Rodney, K., Heitschmid, T., & Jerry, S. (2011). Grazing Management and Ecological Perspective, 2nd Ed. Timber Publishing, 259 pp.
  32. Saeednejad, A.H., Rezvani Moqhaddam, P., Kazaei, H.R., & Nasir Mahalati, M. (2012). Assessment the effect of organic fertilizers, biofertilizers and chemical on forage quality of Sorghum. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 9(4), 623-630. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/gsc.v9i4.13241
  33. Shata, S.M., Mahamoud, A., & Siam, S. (2007). Improving calcareous soil productivity by integrated effect of intercropping and fertilizer. Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences, 3, 733-739.
  34. Sharma, R., Singh, M., Kumar, P., & Sharma, A. (2020). Mineral profile of abandoned cows suffering from anestrus. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 90(4), 581-583. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v90i4.104203
  35. Suresh, G., Mehera, B., & Kumar, P. (2022). Effect of organic manures on growth and yield of Wheat (Triticum aestivum). Pharma Innovation, 11(7),759-762.
  36. Thind, S.S., Sing, M., Sidhu, A.S., & Chhibba, I.M. (2018). Influence of continuous application of organic manures and nitrogen fertilizer on crop yield, N uptake and nutrient status under maize-wheat rotation. Journal of Research Punjab Agricultural University, 39(3), 357-361.
  37. Tilley, J.A. & Terry, R.A. (1963). A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crop. Journal of British Grassland Society, 18, 104-111
  38. Vajedi Roshan, S.A., Rahimi Petroudi, E., Mirzaie, G., & Mobasser, H. (2015). Effects of nitrogen fertilizers and manure (farmyard manure) on grain yield and yield components. New Finding in Agriculture, 9(3), 237-251. (In Persian with English abstract)
  39. Van Soest, P.J., Robertson, J.B., & Lewis, B.A. (1991). Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74(10), 3583-3596. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
  40. Waniyo, U.U., Sauwa, M.M., Ngala, A.L., Abubakr, G.A., & Anelo, E.C. (2014). Influence of sources and rates of manure on yield and nutrient uptake of maize (Zea mays) in Maiduguri, Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Basic and Applied Science, 21(4), 259-265. https://doi.org/10.4314/njbas.v21i4.3
  41. Zeidan, M.S., Amany, A., & El. Kramany, M.F. (2016). Effect of N- fertilizer and plant density on yield quality of maize in sandy soil. Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Science, 2(4), 156-161.
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله
CAPTCHA Image
بوم شناسی کشاورزی
دوره 16، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 59
فروردین 1403
صفحه 129-146

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 30 مرداد 1401
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 16 دی 1401
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 14 فروردین 1402
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار: 14 فروردین 1402

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار