Pricing of environmental friendly herbicides appropriate for sustainable agriculture, A case study: wheat farmers in Khorasan Razavi province

Document Type : Scientific - Research

Authors

Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

Awareness of wheat farmers’ personal preferences towards environmental issues and weed types is important in pricing bioherbicides for sustainable weed management and could consequently be a fundamental guide to agricultural authorities and policy-makers. In the present study, a survey was carried out by using data collected from 180 wheat farmers of Korasan Razavi province during 2008, together with hedonic pricing method. The role of environmental qualitative factors and weed type on pricing environmental-friendly herbicides on the basis of “willingness to pay” was studied. Results from the estimation of hedonic pricing method indicated that reduction of water pollution, human health risk, farmers information about negative effects of chemical herbicides and the virtual variable of weed type had significant effects on pricing environmental friendly herbicides. Variables of soil pollution and weed perenniality had no significant effects on pricing herbicide applicable to sustainable agricultural systems. Based on the results of this study, possibilities of using bioherbicide or less pollutant herbicides and also the rate of farmers willingness to pay for alternatives in the region are important factors recommended for additional studies

Keywords


Anderson, F.R., 1993. Natural resource damages, superfund, and the courts. In R.J. Kopp and V.K. Smith (eds.),
Valuing Natural Assets. the Economics of natural resource damage assessment. Washington D.C.: Resource for the
Future, 26-62.
2- Beach, E., Carlson, G., 1993. Hedonic analysis of herbicides: Do user safety and water quality matter? Amer. J.
Agric. Econ, 75: 612-623.
3- Blair, A., White, D., 1985. Leukemia cell types and agricultural practices in Nebraska. Archives of Env. Health,
40:211-214.
4- Cochran, W.G. 1963. Sampling techniques. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York.
5- Fernandez-Cornejo, J., Jans, S., 1995. Quality-adjusted price and quality indices for pesticides. Amer. J. Agric.
Econ, 77:645-659.
6- Florax, R., Travisi, C., Nijkamp, P., 2005. A meta-analysis of the willingness to pay for reduction in pesticide
exposure. European Rev. Agric. Econ, 32:441-467.
7- Funari, E., Donati, L., Sandroni, D., Vighi, M., 1995. Pesticide levels in groundwater: Value and limitation of
monitoring. In M. Vighi and E. Funari (eds), Pesticide Risk in Groundwater. Chelsea, MI: Lewis.
8- Freeman, A.M., 1974. On estimating air pollution control benefit from land value studies. J. Envir. Econ. and
manage, 9(1): 74-83.
9- Gaugler, R., 1997. Alternative paradigms for commercializing biopesticides. Phytoparastitica, 25:3.
10- Ghorbani, M., 1997. Qualitative factors affecting rice price: Application of hedonic pricing model. Presented in
conference of recognition talents trade - economic province, Babolsar, University of Mazandaran.
100 نشریه بوم شناسی کشاورزی، جلد 1، شماره 1، سال 1388
11- Ghorbani, M., Koocheki, A.R., Laqzian, A., Kohansal, M.R., Tabaraei, M., Motallebi, M., Shokri, A., Torshizi, M.,
2008. Factors affecting on farmers investment in soil conservation of Khorasan Razavi province. J. Agric. Sci and
Indust, 21(2): 11-21.
12- Ghorbani, M., Firozzare, A., 2008. Introduction to valuation of environment. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
Press, Iran.
13- Ghorbani, M., Ghorbani, R., Kohansal, M.R., Nemati, A., 2009. Determinants of weeds management methods in
wheat farms of Khorasan Razavi province. J. Agric. Econ, (Forthcoming).
14- Higley, L., Wintersteen, W., 1992. A novel approach to environmental risk assessment of pesticides as a basis for
incorporating environmental costs into economic injury level . Amer. Entomologist, 38: 34-39.
15- Hoseini, S.S., Ghorbani, M., 2005. Economics of soil erosion. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Press, Iran.
16- Hoar, S.K., Blair, A., Holmes, F.F., Boysen, C.D., Robel, R.J., Hoover, R., Fraumeni, J.F. Jr, 1986. Agricultural
herbicide use and risk of lymphoma and soft-tissue sarcoma. J. Amer. Med. Assn, 256: 1141-1147.
17- Lancaster, K.J., 1966. A new approach to consumer theory. J. politic. Econ, 74: 132-156.
18- Lucas, R.E.B., 1975. Hedonic price functions. Econ. inqurity, 13: 157-178.
19- Luhdholm, E., 1987. Thinning of egg shells in birds by DDT: Mode of action on the eggshell gland. Comparative
Biochemistry and Physiology, 88: 1–22.
20- Mason, C. F., Ford, T. C., Last N. I., 1986. Organochlorine residues in British otters. Bulletin of Environmental
Contamination and Toxicology, 36: 29–436.
21- Menn, J. J., 1996. Biopesticides: Has their time come? Journal of Environmental Science and Health B, 31(3): 383-
389.
22- Mullen, j., Norton, G., Reaves, D., 1997. Economic analysis of environmental benefits form integrated pest
management. J. Agric. App. Econ, 29(2):243-253.
23- Murray, A., 1985. Acute and residual toxicity of a new pyretroid insecticide, WL 85871, to honey bees. Bulletin of
Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 34: 560–564.
24- Navon, A., 2000. Bacillus thuringiensis insecticides in crop protection-reality and prospects. Crop Protection, 19:
669-676.
25- Nemati, A., 2009. Evaluating the management of weeds in wheat farms (case study of Khorasan Razavi Province).
M.sc. Thesis. Fac. Agric. Ferdowsi Univ Mashhad., Iran.
26- Pimentel, D., Greiner A., 1997. Environmental and socio-economic costs of pesticide use. In D. Pimentel (ed.),
Techniques for Reducing Pesticide Use: Economics and Environmental Benefits. Chichester: John Wiley.
27- Ribaudo, M., 1993. Atrazine and water quality: Issues, regulations and economics. Agricultural Resources Situation
and Outlook, AR-30. Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC,
28- Rosen, S., 1974. Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition. J.Politic. Econ,
82:34–55.
29- Sivayoganathan, C., Gnanachandran, S., Lewes, J., Fernando, M., 2000. Protective measure use and symptoms
among agropesticide applicators in Sri Lanka. Social Sci. and Medicine, 40:431-436.
30- Soderqvist, T., 1998. Valuing chemical characteristics: A hedonic approach. In: Swanson, T., Vighi, M. (Eds.),
Regulating Chemical Accumulation in the Environment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
31- Sydorovych, O., Marra, M., 2008. Valuing the changes in herbicide risks resulting from adoption of Roundup
Ready Soybeans by U.S. farmers: An empirical analysis of revealed value estimates. Southern Agricultural
Economics Association Annual Meetings.
32- Travisi, C., Nijkamp, P., Vindigni, G., 2006. Pesticide risk valuation in empirical economics: A comparative
approach. EcoL. Econ, 56:455-474.
33- Wigle, D.T., Semenciw, R.M., Wilkins, K., Riedel, D., Ritter, L., Morrison, Mao, H.I., 1990. Mortality Study of
Canadian Male Farm Operators: Non-Hodgkin's Lymphonoma Mortality and Agricultural Practices in
Saskatchewan. J. National Cancer Inst, 82: 575-582.
34- World Bank. 1998. Economic analysis and environmental assessment. Supplement of the Environmental
Assessment sourcebook 23. Washington D.C.: The World Bank – Environment Department.
CAPTCHA Image