بررسی اثر مصرف زغال زیستی روی رنگیزه‌های فتوسنتزی، فعالیت آنزیمی و عملکرد گلرنگ (Carthamus tinctorius L.) در شرایط تنش آبی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 بخش اگرواکولوژی، دانشکده کشاورزی و منابع ‌طبیعی داراب، دانشگاه شیراز، ایران.

2 بخش علوم خاک، دانشکده کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی داراب، دانشگاه شیراز، ایران.

چکیده

به‌منظور بررسی مصرف زغال زیستی و تنش آبی بر ویژگی‌های بیوشیمیایی و عملکرد گلرنگ (Carthamus tinctorius L.) پژوهشی به‌صورت کرت‌های خرد شده در قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار در دانشگاه شیراز در فصل رشد 99- 1398 اجرا شد. فاکتورهای آزمایش شامل رژیم آبیاری (آبیاری مطلوب و قطع آبیاری پس از گل‌دهی) و تیمار کودی شامل شاهد بدون کود، مصرف سه تن زغال زیستی گندم و یا پنبه در هکتار، 150 کیلوگرم اوره + 50 کیلوگرم سوپرفسفات تریپل در هکتار، 5/112 کیلوگرم اوره + 5/37 کیلوگرم سوپرفسفات تریپل در هکتار و 5/112 کیلوگرم اوره + 5/37 کیلوگرم سوپر فسفات تریپل + سه تن زغال­زیستی گندم و یا پنبه در هکتار بودند. در شرایط قطع آبیاری مصرف 5/112 کیلوگرم اوره + 5/37 کیلوگرم سوپرفسفات تریپل + سه تن زغال زیستی گندم در هکتار به‌ترتیب میزان کلروفیل a و کل را 55 و 40 درصد، نسبت به شاهد افزایش دادند. بالاترین میزان فعالیت آنزیم کاتالاز و پراکسیداز در تیمار قطع آبیاری در گل‌دهی به‌دست آمد. همچنین، در شرایط تنش آبی کاربرد 5/112 کیلوگرم اوره + 5/37 کیلوگرم سوپرفسفات تریپل + سه تن زغال زیستی پنبه، سبب افزایش محتوای نسبی آب برگ، عملکرد زیست‌توده و دانه به‌ترتیب به‌میزان 03/53، 05/22 و 7/34 درصد گردید. به‌طور کلی، کاربرد 5/112 کیلوگرم اوره + 5/37 کیلوگرم سوپرفسفات تریپل + سه تن زغال زیستی پنبه در هکتار، در شرایط تنش آبی باعث بهبود محتوای نسبی آب برگ، تعداد دانه در طبق، تعداد طبق بارور در بوته و در نهایت، عملکرد دانه گلرنگ شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigation of Biochar Application Effect on Photosynthetic Pigments, Enzymes Activity and Yield of Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) under Water Stress

نویسندگان [English]

  • Marzieh Ghaedi 1
  • Ehsan Bijanzadeh 1
  • Mahdi Najafi Ghiri 2
  • Ali Behpouri 1
  • Vahid Barati 1
1 Department of agroecology , College of Agriculture and Natural Resources of Darab, Shiraz University, Iran
2 Department of Soil Science , College of Agriculture and Natural Resources of Darab, Shiraz University, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction
Water stress is one of the main factors in crop growth in arid and semi-arid regions of the world, which limits the grain yield of the safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). To increase the soil fertility and yield of crops, it is necessary to pay sufficient attention to the use of biomass of organic matter, especially crop residues, and its conversion to biochar. This research aims to evaluate the biochar application produced from cotton and wheat residues under late-season water stress in the south of Fars province (Darab) on photosynthetic pigments, enzyme activity, yield components, and yield of safflower.
Materials and Methods
In order to investigate the biochar application and water stress on the amount of photosynthetic pigments, enzyme activity, and yield of safflower, a field experiment was laid out as split plots in the form of randomized complete block design with 3 replications in the 2019-2020 growing season. The experimental factors include the irrigation regime as the main factor in two levels (optimal irrigation and cutting off irrigation after the flowering stage), and the secondary factors were fertilizer treatment as subplot including control (without fertilizer), consumption of 3 tons of biochar from wheat residues per hectare, consumption of 3 tons of biochar from cotton residues per hectare, consumption of 150 kg of urea per hectare + 50 kg of triple superphosphate per hectare, consumption of 112.5 kg of urea per hectare + 37.5 kg of triple superphosphate per hectare, consumption of 112.5 kg of urea + 37.5 kg of triple superphosphate + 3 tons wheat biomass per hectare, and 112.5 kg of urea + 37.5 kg of triple superphosphate + 3 tons of cotton biomass per hectare. In this research, chlorophyll a and b, total chlorophyll, catalase, and peroxidase activities, yield components, and yield of safflower were calculated.
Results and Discussion
The results of the experiment showed that the measured traits were significantly affected by the irrigation regime and fertilizer treatment. Under cutting-off irrigation after the flowering stage, the fertilizer treatment of 112.5 urea + 37.5 phosphate + 3 tons of wheat biochar per hectare increased 55 and 40% chlorophyll a and total chlorophyll compared to the control, respectively. Water stress increased the carotenoid content, catalase, and peroxidase enzymes. The highest amount of catalase and peroxidase enzyme activity was obtained in the control under cutting-off irrigation after the flowering stage, which increased by 48 and 38%, respectively, compared to the control under optimal irrigation. The number of seeds per capitule and the number of fertile capitules per plant in the treatment of 112.5 urea + 37.5 phosphate + 3 tons of cotton biochar under water stress conditions increased by 8.8 and 19.51%, respectively. Also, under water stress, the application of 112.5 urea + 37.5 phosphates + 3 tons of cotton biochar improved and increased the relative content of leaf water, biological capitules yield, and grain yield compared to the control by %53, %22, and %34, compared to control, respectively.
Conclusion
Results showed that in both of the irrigation regimes, application of 3 tons of cotton or wheat biochar alone can increase the biomass and grain yield compared to control. Overall, the application of 112.5 urea + 37.5 phosphate + 3 tons of cotton biochar under water stress conditions improved the relative water content of the leaves, the number of seeds per capitule, the number of fertile capitule per plant, and finally, biomass and yield of safflower. With respect to water shortage under late season in southern parts of Fars province, and in order to decrease the detrimental effects of water stress, farmers can use the biochar of cotton combined with reduced dosage of urea and triple superphosphate fertilizers.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Catalase
  • Chlorophyll
  • Cutting off irrigation
  • Number of seed per capitule
  • Peroxidase

©2023 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source

مراجع

  1. Abbasi, M.K., & Anwar, A.A. (2015). Ameliorating effects of biochar derived from poultry manure and white clover residues on soil nutrient status and plant growth promotion-greenhouse experiments. Plos One, 10(6), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131592
  2. Abdalla, M.M., & El-Khoshiban, N.H. (2007). The influence of water stress on growth, relative water content, photosynthetic pigments, some metabolic and hormonal contents of two Triticum aestivum Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 3, 2062-2074.
  3. Adejumo, S.A., Owolabi, M.O., & Odesola, I.F. (2016). Agro-physiologic effects of compost and biochar produced at different temperatures on growth, photosynthetic pigment and micronutrients uptake of maize crop. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 11, 661-673. http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2015.9895
  4. Aebi, H. (1984). Catalase in vitro. In Methods in Enzymology, 105, 121-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(84)05016-3
  5. Amiri, A., Sirousmehr, A.R., Yadollahi, P., Asgharipour, A.R., & Esmaeilzadeh Bahbadi S. (2016). Effect of drought stress and spraying of salicylic acid and chitosan on photosynthetic pigments and antioxidant enzymes in safflower. Journal of Crops Improvement, 18,453-466. (In Persian with English abstract)
  6. Arnon, A.N. (1967). Method of extraction of chlorophyll in the plants. Agronomy Journal, 23, 112-121.
  7. Arvin, P., Vafabakhsh, J., & Mazaheri, D. (2017). Study of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and drought on physiological traits and ultimate yield of cultivars of oilseed rape (Brassica L.). Journal of Agroecology, 4, 1208-1226. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/jag.v9i4.61808
  8. Asghari, B., & Gharibi Asl, S. (2016). The oil and protein content of Isfahan’s safflower in different periods of irrigation, levels of humic acid and superabsorbent. International Journal of Life Science and Pharma Research, 1, 56-63.
  9. Asqarpanh, J., & Kazemivash, N. (2013). Pharmacology and medicinal properties of (Carthamus tinctorius L). Chines Journal of Integrative Medicine, 19(2), 53-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11655-013-1354-5
  10. Azad Bakht, F., Ahmadi, K., & Omidi, H. (2017). Effect of late season drought stress on seed germination indices and photosynthetic pigments of native root genotypes (Carthamus tinctrorius) safflower. Crop Physiology, 3, 75-90. (In Persian with English abstract)
  11. Barrsu, H. D., & Weatherley, P.E. (1962). Are-examination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficits in leaves. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences, 15, 413-4280. https://doi.org/10.1071/BI9620413
  12. Bahadori, F., Bijanzadeh, E., & Behpuri, A. (2019). Investigating delayed cultivation on the re-transfer of cultured materials, yield components and yield of two safflower cultivars in the condition of interruption of irrigation. Journal of Plant Production Research, 28(4), 85-104. https://doi.org/0.22069/JOPP.2021.17472.2612
  13. Berek, A.K., Hue, N., & Ahmad, A. (2011). Beneficial use of biochar to correct soil acidity. The Food Provider, 9, 1-3.
  14. Blackwell, P., Riethmuller, G., & Collins, M. (2009). Biochar application for soil. P 207-222, In: J. Lehman and S. Joseph (Eds.), Biochar for Environmental Management, Science and Technology. Eds Earthscan, London, Sterling, VA.
  15. Borislev, M., Borislev, I., Zupunski, M., Arsenvo, D., Pajevic, S., Curcic, Z., Vasin, J., & Djordjevic, A. (2016). Drought impact is alleviated in sugar beets (Beta vulgaris) by foliar application of fullerenol nanoparticles. Plos One, 10, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166248
  16. Chalker-Scott, L. (2002). Do anthocyanins function as osmoregulators in leaf tissues? Advances in Botanical Research, 37, 103-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2296(02)37046-0
  17. Chang, C.C., Lee, H.L., & Hsu, S.H. (2013). Food security: Global trends and regional perspective with reference to East Asia. The Pacific Review, 26, 589-613. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2013.842315
  18. Chan, K.Y., Van Zwieten, L., Meszaros, I., Downie, A., & Joseph, S. (2008). Using poultry litter biochars as soil amendments. Soil Research, 46(5), 437-444. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR08036
  19. Cornelissen, G., Martinsen, V., Shitumbanuma, V., Alling, V., Breedveld, G.D., Rutherford, D.W., & Mulder, J. (2013). Biochar effect on maize yield and soil characteristics in five conservation farming sites in Zambia. Agronomy, 3(2), 256-274. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy3020256
  20. Daneshmand, A.R., Shirani Rad, A.H., & Ardakani, M.R. (2006). Evaluation of water deficit stress on tolerance of spring rapeseed (Brassica napus) genotypes. Agronomy Research, 1, 48-60. (In Persian with English abstract)
  21. Das, R.C., Somanagouda, G., & Singh, B. (2017). Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management (INM) practices on growth, yield and oil yield of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius). Internatiol Journal of Current Microbiolgy and Applied Sciences, 6, 511-516.
  22. Ding, Z., Hu, X., Wan, Y., Wang, S., & Gao, B. (2015). Removal of lead, copper, cadmium, zinc and nickel from aqueous solutions by alkali-modified biochar: Batch and column tests. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 15, 300-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2015.10.007
  23. Flemmer, A.C., Franchini, M.C., & Lindstrom, L.I. (2015). Description of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) phonological growth stages according to the extended BBCH scale. Annals of Applied Biology, 27, 331-339. https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12186
  24. Flexas, J., Bota, J., Gales, J., Medrano, H., & Ribas- Carbo, M. (2008). Keeping a positive carbon balance under adverse conditions responses of photosynthesis and respiration to water stress. Physiologia Plantarum, 12, 343-352. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2006.00621.x
  25. Gee, G.W., & Or, D. (2002). Particle size analysis. In: Methods of soil analysis Part 4 physical methods. Wisc. USA: Madison 255–293.
  26. Ghosh, P.K., Ajay, K.K., Bandyopadhyay, M.C., Manna, K.G., Mandal, A.K., & Hati, K.M. (2004). Comparative effectiveness of cattle manure, poultry manure, phosphocompost and fertilizer NPK on three cropping system in vertisoils of semi-arid tropics. Dry matter yield, nodulation, chlorophyll content and enzyme activity. Bioresource Technology, 95, 85-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2004.02.011
  27. Glaser, B., Lehmann, J., & Zech, W. (2002). Ameliorating physical and chemical properties of highly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal–A review. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 35(4), 219-230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-002-0466-4
  28. Gunes, A., Cicek, N., Inal, A., Alpaslan, M., Eraslan, F., Guneri, E., & Guzelordu, T. (2006). Genotypic response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) cultivars to drought stress implemented at pre-and post-anthesis stages and its relations with nutrient uptake and efficiency. Plant Soil and Environment, 52, 868- 876. https://doi.org/10.17221/3454-PSE
  29. Hayashi, H., & Hanada, K. (1985). Effects of soil water deficit on seed yield and yield components of safflower. Japanese Journal of Crop Science, 54, 346-352. https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.54.346
  30. Helmke, P., Sparks, D., Page, A., Loeppert, R., Soltanpour, P., Tabatabai, M., Johnston, C., & Sumner, M. (1996). Lithium, sodium, potassium, rubidium, and cesium. Methods of soil analysis Part 3 chemical methods 551–574.
  31. Herath, H.M.S.K., Camps-Arbestain, M., & Hedley, M. (2013). Effect of biochar on soil physical properties in two contrasting soils: An Alfisol and an Andisol. Geoderma, 209, 188-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.06.016
  32. Hassanpour Lescokelaye, K., Ahmadi, J., Daneshyan, J., & Hatami, S. (2013). Changes in chlorophyll, protein and antioxidant enzymes on durum wheat under drought stress. Journal of Crop Breeding, 1, 76-87. (In Persian with English abstract)
  33. Hosseinzadeh, S.R., Amiri, H., & Ismaili, A. (2016). Effect of vermicompost fertilizer on photosynthetic characteristics of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) under drought stress. Photosynthetic, 54, 87-92.
  34. Hussain, M.I., Lyra, D.A., Farooq, M., Nikoloudakis, N., & Khalid, N. (2016). Salt and drought stresses in safflower: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 36(1), 4-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0344-8
  35. Ippolito, J.A., Laird, D.A., & Busscher, W.J. (2012). Environmental benefits of biochar. Journal of Environmental Quality, 41(4), 967-972. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2012.0151
  36. Kafi, M., & Rostami, M. (2007). Yield characteristics and oil content of three safflower. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research. 5(1), 121-132. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/gsc.v5i1.903
  37. Lehmann, J., Rillig, M.C., Thies, J., Masiello, C.A., Hockaday, W.C., & Crowley, D. (2011). Biochar effects on soil biota–A review. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 43(9), 1812-1836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.04.022
  38. Lin, C.C., & Kao, C.H. (2006). Abscisic acid induced changes in cell wall peroxidase activity and hydrogen peroxide level in roots of rice seedlings. Plant Science, 2, 323-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(00)00396-4
  39. Lindsay, W.L., & Norvell, W.A. (1978). Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Soil Science Society of American Journal, 42, 421–428. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1978.03615995004200030009x
  40. Liu, F., Andersen, M.N., & Jensen, C.R. (2004). Root signal controls pod growth in drought stressed soybean during the critical, abortion sensitive phase of pod development. Fields Crop Research, 85, 159-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(03)00164-3
  41. Liu, Z., Chen, X., Jing, Y., Li, Q., Zhang, J., & Huang, Q. (2014). Effects of biochar amendment on rapeseed and sweet potato yields and water stable aggregate in upland red soil. Catena, 123, 45-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2014.07.005
  42. Manya, J.J. (2012). Pyrolysis for biochar purposes: A review to establish current knowledge gaps and research needs. Environmental Science and Technology, 46, 15. 7939-7954. https://doi.org/10.1021/es301029g
  43. Melo, C.A., Coscionc, A.R., Aberu, C.A., Puga, A.P., & Camargo, O.A. (2013). Influence of pyrolysis temperature on cadmium and zinc sorption capacity of sugar cane straw derived biochar. Bioresources, 8(4), 4992-5004.
  44. Mendez, A., Gomez, A., Paz-Ferreeiro, J., & Gasco, G. (2012). Effects of sewage sludge biochar on plant metal availability after application to a Mediterranean soil. Chemosphere, 89, 1354-1359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.05.092
  45. Najafi-Ghiri, M., Bijanzadeh E., & Bahadori, F. (2022a). Effect of wheat-derived biochar on soil nutrients availability and nutrients uptake by two safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) cultivars under water stress. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 53, 1592-1606. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2022.2060251
  46. Najafi-Ghiri, M., Bijanzadeh, E., & Ghaedi, M. (2022b). Soil potassium relations in an arid soil treated with biochar and chemical fertilizers after cultivation with safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) under water stress. Arid Land Research and Management, 36, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/15324982.2022.2158960
  47. Navabpour, S., Ramezanpour, S.S., & Mazandarani, A. (2015). Evaluation of enzymatic and non-enzymatic defense mechanism in response to drought stress during growth stage in soybean. Technologies Crops Production, 2(15), 39-52.
  48. Noroozi, M., & Kazemini, S.A.R. (2012). Effect of water stress and plant density on growth and seed yield of safflower. Iranian Journal Field Crops Research. 10, 781-788. (In Persian with English abstract)
  49. OlsenR., (1954). Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. United States Department of Agriculture. Washington.
  50. Peng, J., Han, X., Li, N., Chen, K., Yang, J., Zhan, X., Peyiu, L., & Liu, N. (2021). Combined application of biochar with fertilizer promotes nitrogen uptake in maize by increasing nitrogen retention in soil. Biochar, 3, 367-379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-021-00090-6
  51. Rahbarian, R., Khavari-Nejad, R., Ganjeali, A., Bagheri, A., Najafi, F., & Roshanfekr, M. (2012). Use of biochemical indices and antioxidant enzymes as a screening technique for drought tolerance in chickpea genotypes (Cicer arietinum). African Journal of Agricultural Research, 7, 5372-5380. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR11.846
  52. Rajkovich, S., Enders, A., Hanley, K., Hyland, C., Zimmerman, A.R., & Lehmann, J. (2012). Corn growth and nitrogen nutrition after addition of biochars with varying properties to a temperate soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 48, 271-284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00374-011-0624-7
  53. Rhoades, J.D. (1996). Salinity: Electrical conductivity and total dissolved solids. In: Methods of soil analysis Part 3 chemical methods. Wisc. USA: Madison. 417–435.
  54. Sajedi, A., & Sajedi, N.A. (2018). Effect of application biochar and priming and foliar application with water and salicylic acid on physiological traits of dry land safflower. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 17, 305-316. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22077/escs.2019.1823.1426
  55. Santosa, C. (2004). Regulation of chlorophyll biosynthesis and degradation by salt stress in sunflower leaves. Scientia Horticultura, 10, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2004.04.009
  56. Shiresmaeili, G., Maghsoudi mood, A.A., Khajoueinezhad, G., & Abdolshahi, R. (2017). Effect of irrigation cut treatment on yield and yield components of ten safflower cultivars in spring and summer crops. Applied Research in Field Crops, 30(3), 1-17. (In Persian with English abstract)
  57. Sirous Mehr, A., Bardel, J., & Mohammadi, S. (2014). Changes of germination properties, photosynthetic pigments and antioxidant enzymes activity of safflower as affected by drought and salinity stresses. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology, 4, 517-534. (In Persian with English abstract)
  58. Sohi, S. P., Krull, E., Lopez-Capel, E., & Bol, R. (2010). A review of biochar and its use and function in soil. Advances in Agronomy, 105, 47-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(10)05002-9
  59. Sohi, S.P. (2012). Carbon storage with benefits. Science, 338(6110), 1034-1035. https://doi: 10.1126/science.1225987
  60. Song, W., & Guo, M.X. (2012). Quality variations of poultry litter biochar generated at different pyrolysis temperatures. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 94, 138-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2011.11.018
  61. Sun, Y., Gao, B., Yao, Y., Fang, J., Zhang, M., Zhao, Y., Chen, H., & Yang, L. (2014). Effect of feedstock type, production method and pyrolysis temperature on biochar and hydrobiochar properties. Chemical Engineering Journal, 240, 574-578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.10.081
  62. Taheri, S., Gholami, A., Abbasdokht, H., & Makarian, H. (2017). Alleviation of water deficit stress effects on safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) cultivars by seed priming. Journal of Crops Improvement, 2, 478-502. (In Persian with English abstract) . https://doi.org/10.22059/jci.2018.244528.1858
  63. Van Zwieten, L., Kimber, S., Morris, S., Chan, K.Y., Downie, A., Joseph, S., & Cowie, A. (2010). Effects of biochar from slow pyrolysis of papermill waste on agronomic performance and soil fertility. Plant and Soil, 327(1), 235-246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-0050-x
  64. Yang, X., Liu, J., McGrouther, K., Hung, H., Lu, K., Gao, X., He, L., Lin, X., Che, L., Ye, Z., & Wang, H. (2016). Effect of biochar on the extractability of heavy metals (Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn) and enzyme activity in soil. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22, 3183-3190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4233-0
  65. Zhou, R., Yu, X., Ottosen, C.O., Rosenqvist, E., Zhao, L., Wang, Y., & Wu, Z. (2017). Drought stress had a predominant effect over heat stress on three tomato cultivars subjected to combined stress. BMC Plant Biology, 17, 24-33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-017-0974-x
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله
CAPTCHA Image

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 02 دی 1401
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 07 اسفند 1401
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 29 فروردین 1402
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار: 29 فروردین 1402

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار