ارزیابی عملکرد و اجزای‌ عملکرد ارقام مختلف باقلا (Vicia faba L.) در کشت مخلوط با‌ تریتیکاله (Tritico secale L.)

سوری, سمیه; امیرنیا, رضا; رضائی چیانه, اسماعیل; شیخ, فاطمه

doi:10.22067/jag.v12i1.81918

ارزیابی عملکرد و اجزای‌ عملکرد ارقام مختلف باقلا (Vicia faba L.) در کشت مخلوط با‌ تریتیکاله (Tritico secale L.)

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

¹ گروه مهندسی تولید و ژنتیک گیاهی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه ارومیه، ایران.

² بخش زراعی و باغی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان گلستان، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، گرگان، ایران

10.22067/jag.v12i1.81918

چکیده

به‌منظور بررسی عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد ارقام مختلف باقلا (Vicia faba L.) در کشت مخلوط سری جایگزینی با تریتیکاله (Tritico secale L.)، در قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار در مزرعه تحقیقاتی دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه ارومیه در سال زراعی 97-1396 به‌اجرا درآمد. تیمارها شامل کشت مخلوط تریتیکاله + رقم هیستال باقلا، تریتیکاله + رقم شادان باقلا، تریتیکاله + رقم فیض باقلا، تریتیکاله + رقم مهتا، تریتیکاله + رقم برکت باقلا، تریتیکاله + رقم لوزدی اتونو،کشت خالص تریتیکاله و هر یک از ارقام باقلا بودند. کشت مخلوط اثر معنی‌داری بر صفات مورد مطالعه (صفات تعداد و وزن خشک گره ریشه باقلا، ارتفاع بوته، طول نیام، تعداد نیام در بوته، تعداد دانه در نیام، وزن 100 دانه و عملکرد دانه و بیولوژیک در باقلا و در تریتیکاله صفات ارتفاع بوته، طول سنبله، تعداد سنبله در بوته، تعداد سنبلچه در سنبله، تعداد دانه در سنبله، وزن 1000 دانه، عملکرد دانه و بیولوژیک) دو گیاه باقلا و تریتیکاله داشتند. تراکم بهینه دو گیاه در کشت خالص برای باقلا 20 بوته و برای تریتیکاله 400 بوته در مترمربع در نظر گرفته شد. نتایج در مورد گیاه تریتیکاله نشان داد که بیشترین عملکرد دانه (4/7035 کیلوگرم در هکتار) و عملکرد بیولوژیک (22874 کیلوگرم در هکتار) به‌ترتیب در کشت مخلوط تریتیکاله + رقم فیض و تریتیکاله+ رقم لوزدی ‌اتونو مشاهده شد. بیشترین عملکرد دانه و عملکرد بیولوژیک باقلا به‌ترتیب با میانگین 9/3554 و 5/8356 کیلوگرم در هکتار به رقم شادان در کشت مخلوط با تریتیکاله تعلق داشت. بیشترین تعداد گره و وزن خشک گره ریشه باقلا (به‌ترتیب با 4/203 عدد گره و 1/1 گرم) از رقم شادان در کشت مخلوط با تریتیکاله و کمترین آن به‌ترتیب با 3/117 گره و 4/0 گرم از کشت خالص رقم شادان باقلا به‌دست آمد. نسبت برابری زمین (LER) در تمامی تیمارهای کشت مخلوط بیشتر از یک بود و بالاترین میزان برای تیمارهای کشت مخلوط تریتیکاله با هر یک از ارقام فیض، هیستال و شادان به‌دست آمد که می‌تواند برای کشت مخلوط با تریتیکاله توصیه شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

20.1001.1.20087713.1399.12.1.9.1

عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation of Yield and Yield Components of Different Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.) Varieties in Intercropping with Triticale (Tritico secale)

نویسندگان [English]

Somaieh Sori ¹
Reza Amirnia ¹
Esmaeil Rezaei-Chiyaneh ¹
Fatemeh Sheikh ²

¹ Department of Production Engineering and Plant Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Urmia University, Iran.

² Department of Agricultural and Horticultural , Center for Research and Education of Agriculture and Resources Golestan Province Natural, Agricultural Research, Education and Promotion Organization, Gorgan, Iran

چکیده [English]

Introduction
Intercropping, i.e. growing two or more crops together on the same land at the same time. The intercropped legumes/cereal systems reduce inter-specific competition by enhancing complementarity/facilitation processes thereby improving the exploitation of environmental resources; on the other hand, it has led to improved crop production, which is due to greater efficiency in the intercropping system. Salehi et al. (2018) in intercropping of triticale with annual legumes reported that the highest plant height, number of spike per m-2, spikelet number per spike, grain number per spike, grain and biological yield of triticale were obtained in the sole crops but the lowest economic yield of triticale was achieved from intercropping of triticale with vetch, respectively. The purpose of this study was to investigate the response of growth, yield and yield components for different fababean cultivars affected as in intercropping with triticale in order to achieve the most suitable combination in terms of maximum yield and land use efficiency in Urmia weather conditions.
Materials and Methods
In order to evaluate yield and yield components of different faba bean varieties in intercropping with triticale, a field experiment was conducted based on a randomized complete block design with thirteen treatments and three replications at the Research Farm of the Faculty of Agriculture, Urmia University, Iran, during the growing season of 2018. Treatments were included sole cropping of triticale, replacement intercropping of triticale with five-faba bean varieties (Mahta, Histal, Feyz, Barkat, Luzde otono and Shadan) in ratios 1:1. Triticale was harvested when spike turned brown and different faba bean varieties were harvested when the first pod of the plants fully matured. Field data were collected by cutting 10 plants randomly from each plot and yield component of each plant was considered as the average for each plot. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed using SAS software; version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) and significant differences between treatments were compared with the Duncan test at P≤0.05.
Results and Discussion
The results showed that the highest plant height, spike length, number of spike per m-2, spikelet number per spike, grain number per spike, grain and biological yield, and chlorophyll a and b contents of triticale were obtained in the intercropping system. Also, the maximum nodule number, nodule dry weight, plant height, length pods, number of seeds per pod, 100- seed weight, seed and biological yield, and chlorophyll a and b contents of different faba bean varieties were achieved from intercropping and the lowest amounts of mentioned were recorded in the sole cropping of both plants, respectively. The higher seed yields of the intercropping systems compared to the sole cropping were probably due to the better use of environmental resources by balancing inter-specific and intra-specific interactions. The average chlorophyll content of both plants in the intercropping system was higher than the sole cropping. Increasing the chlorophyll content in the intercropping system was attributed to the better availability of nutrients, light, and water. However, the partial LER of faba bean was higher than triticale, indicating that the former was the dominant plant in intercropping patterns. In addition, the highest LER total was calculated for intercropping triticale with Feyz faba bean (2.2 units) and the lowest total LER (1.9) was computed to the triticale with Barkat faba bean hat represents an increased advantage in intercropping than sole cropping.
Conclusion
Our study showed that the productivity of different faba bean varieties in intercropping with triticale could be increased by environmental conditions. The maximum seed and biological yield of both plants were obtained at intercropping. The LER was higher than one in all intercropping treatments compared to sole cropping systems. According to the results, it seems that the use of the intercropping system is remarkably effective to increase the economic income and land-use efficiency.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Chlorophyll
grain yield
Land equivalent ratio
Rhizobium nodule
Sustainable agriculture

مراجع

Ahmadvand, G., and Hajinia, S., 2016. Ecological aspects study of replacement intercropping patterns of soybean (Glycine max L.) and millet (Panicum miliaceum L.). Journal of Agroecology 7(4): 485-498. (In Persian with English Summary)

Amani Machiani, M., Javanmard, A., Morshedloo, M.R., and Maggi, F., 2018. Evaluation of yield, essential oil content and compositions of peppermint (Mentha piperita L.) intercropped with faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Journal of Cleaner Production 171: 529-537.

Amani Machiani, M., Javanmard, A., and Shekari, F., 2017. The effect of intercropping patterns on peppermint (Mentha piperita L.) dry biomass yield and essential oil content and faba bean (Vicia faba L.) seed yield. Journal of Crop Production and Processing 7(3):79-97. (In Persian with English Summary)

Ansari, S., Mirmohammady- Maibody, S.A.M., Arzani, A., and Golkar, P., 2018. Evaluation of different triticale (Triticosecale wittmack X) genotypes for agronomic and qualitative characters. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 15(4): 872-884. (In Persian with English Summary)

Arnon, A., 1967. Method of extraction of chlorophyll in the plants. Agronomy Journal 23(1): 112-121.

Asadi, Gh. A., and Khorramdel, S., 2014. Effects of different ratio of barley and hairy vetch intercropping on yield, plant nitrogen content, weed population and diversity. Electronic Journal of Crop Production 7(1): 131-156. (In Persian with English Summary)

Banik, P., Midya, A., Sarkar, B.K., and Ghsoe, S.S., 2006. Wheat and chickpea intercropping systems in an additive series experiment. Advantages and weed smothering. European Journal of Agronomy 24: 325- 332.

Bedoussac, L., Journet, E.P., Hauggaard- Nielsen, H., Naudin, C., Corre Hellou, G., Jensen, E.S., Prieur, L., and Justes, E., 2015. Ecological principles underlying the increase of productivity achieved by cereal-grain legume intercrops in organic farming: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 35(3): 911-935.

Bo, J.D., Han, T.F., Gai, J.Y., Yong, T.W., Sun, X., Wang, X.C., Yang, F., Liu, J., Shu, K., Liu, W.G., and Yang, W.Y., 2018. Maize-soybean strip intercropping: Achieved a balance between high productivity and sustainability. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 17(4): 747-754.

Chapagain, T., and Riseman, A., 2014. Barley–pea intercropping: Effects on land productivity, carbon and nitrogen transformations. Field Crops Research 166: 18–25.

Chen, P., Song, C., Liu, X. M., Zhou, L., Yang, H., Zhang, X., and Wang, X.C., 2019. Yield advantage and nitrogen fate in an additive maize-soybean relay intercropping system. Science of the Total Environment 657: 987-999.

Dwivedi, A., Dev, I., Kumar, V., Yadav, R.S., Yadav, M., Gupta, D., Singh, A., and Tomar, S.S., 2015. Potential role of maize-legume intercropping systems to improve soil fertility status under smallholder farming systems for sustainable agriculture in India. International Journal of Life Sciences Biotechnology and Pharma Research 4(3): 145.

Eslami, K.F., Pirdashti, H., and Motaghian, A., 2011. Evaluation of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and faba bean (Vicia faba L.) yield in different density and mixture intercropping via competition indices. Journal of Agroecology 3(1): 94-105. (In Persian with English Summary)

FAO., 2017. Food and agriculture organization of the united nation. Quaterly bulletin of Statistics. Remote, Italy.

Gao, Y., Duana, A., Qiua, X., Liua. Z., Suna, J., Zhang, J., and Wanga, H., 2010. Distribution of roots and root length density in a maize/soybean strip intercropping system. Agricultural Water Management 98: 199-212.

Ghale- Noyee, S., Koocheki, A., Yazdi, M.N.P., and Jahan, M., 2016. Effect of different treatments of mixed and row intercropping on yield and yield components of sesame and bean. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 15(3): 588-602. (In Persian with English Summary)

Gholi- Nejad, A., Yadavi, A., Movahhedi Dehnavi, M., and Farajee, H., 2018. The effect of additive intercropping on yield and yield components of sweet corn (Zea mays L. var. Saccharata) and mungbean (Vigna radiate L.) and weed biomass. Journal of Agroecology 10(1): 120-134. (In Persian with English Summary)

Ghosh, P.K., Manna, M., Bandyopadhyay, K., Ajay, A., Tripathi, A., Wanjari, R.H., Hati, K.M., Misra, A.K., Acharya, C.L., and Subba Rao, A., 2006. Interspecific interaction and nutrient use in soybean/sorghum intercropping system. Agronomy Journal 98: 1097-1108.

Hauggard- Nielson, H., Ambus, P., and Jensen, E.S., 2001. Interspecific competition, N use and interference with weeds in pea barly intercropping. Field Crop Research 70: 101- 109.

Inal, A., Gunes, A., Zhang, F., and Cakmak, I., 2007. Peanut/maize intercropping induced changes in rhizosphere and nutrient concentrations in shoots. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 45: 350-356.

Javanmard, A, Rostami, A, Nouraein, M., and Gharekhany, G., 2016. Agronomical, ecological and economical evaluation of wheat- chickpea intercropping under rainfed condition of Maragheh. Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production 26(1): 19-37. (In Persian with English Summary)

Kahraryan, B., Farahvash, F., Mohammadi, S., Mirshekari, B., and Rashidi, V., 2018. Evaluation of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and vetch (Vicia villosa Roth.) intercropping. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology 4(48): 651-670. (In Persian with English Summary)

Khorramdel, S., Siahmargooyi, A., and Ghadriyye, M., 2016. Effect of replacement and additive intercropping series of ajowan with bean on yield and yield components. Journal of Crop Production 9(1): 1-24. (In Persian with English Summary)

Koocheki, A., Zarghani, H., and Norooziyan, A., 2016. Comparison of yield and yield components of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.), sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) and red bean (Phaseolus calcaratus L.) under different intercropping arrangements. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 14(2): 226-243. (In Persian with English Summary)

Li, M., Zhang, J., Liu, S., Ashraf, U., Zhao, B., and Qui, S., 2018. Mixed- cropping systems of different rice cultivars have grain yield and quality advantages over mono- cropping systems. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 99(7): 3326-3334.

Lin, C.W., Chen, Y.C., Huang, J., and Tu, T., 2007. Temporal variation of plant height, plant cover and leaf area index in intercropped area of Sichuan, China. Chinese Journal of Ecology 26: 989-994.

Majnoun- Hosseini, N., 2008. Agriculture and Livestock Production. Tehran University Press, Iran. (In Persian)

Mouradi, M., Farissi, M., Makoudi, B., Bouizgaren, A., and Ghoulam, C., 2018. Effect of Faba bean (Vicia Faba L.) rhizobia symbiosis on barley's growth, phosphorus uptake and acid phosphatase activity in the intercropping system. Annals of Agrarian Science 16(3): 297-303.

Neugschwandtner, R., and Kaul, P.H., 2014. Sowing ratio and N fertilization affect yield and yield components of oat and pea in intercrops. Field Crops Research 155: 159–163.

Nurbakhsh, F., Koocheki, A., and Nassiri Mahallati, M., 2015. Evaluation of yield, yield components and different intercropping indices in mixed and row intercropping of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) and bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Iranian Journal of Pulses Research 6(2): 73-86. (In Persian with English Summary)

Rezaei-Chiyaneh, E., and Gholinezhad, E., 2015. Study of agronomic characteristics and advantage indices in intercropping of additive series of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and black cumin (Nigella sativa L.). Journal of Agroecology 7(3): 381-396. (In Persian with English Summary)

Rezaei- Chiyaneh, E., 2016. Evaluation of quantitative and qualitative traits of black cumin (Nigella sativa L.), and basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) in different intercropping patterns with bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Journal of Agroecology 8(2): 263-280. (In Persian with English Summary)

Rezaei-Chiyaneh, E., Khorramdel, S., and Garachali, P., 2015. Evaluation of relay intercropping of sunflower and faba bean on their yield and land use efficiency. Journal of Crops Improvement 17(1): 183-196. (In Persian)

Rezaei- Chiyaneh, E., Rasouli, Y., Jalilian, J., and Ghodsi, M., 2019. Evaluation of quantitative and qualitative yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) in intercropping affected by biological and chemical fertilizers in supplemental irrigation condistion. Journal of Agroecology 11(1): 69-85. (In Persian with English Summary)

Samizadeh, H., Yazdi-Samadi, B., Ghannadha, M.R., Malbobi, M.A., Taleei, A.R., and Ricestingam, G., 2003. A study of molecular marker associated with pod length trait in canola (B. napus) double haploid population. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 34(4): 871-879. (In Persian with English Summary)

Sheikh, F., Asteraki, H., and Aghajani, M.A., 2018. Report on the introduction of the new bean mahta (G- Faba-95). Seed and Plant Improvement Institute (SII), Iran. 43 p. (In Persian)

Sheikh, F., Sekhavat, R., Miri, K., Asteraki, H., and Aghajani, M. A., 2017a. Report on the introduction of the new bean feyz (G- Faba-1-1). Seed and Plant Improvement Institute (SPII), Iran. 54 p. (In Persian)

Sheikh, F., Sekhavat, R., Miri, K., Asteraki, H., and Aghajani, M.A., 2017b. Report on the introduction of the new bean Shadan (G- Faba-133). Seed and Plant Improvement Institute (SPII), Iran. 57 p. (In Persian)

Soleimanpur, L., Naderi, R., Bijanzdeh, E., and Emam, Y., 2017. Response of faba bean and pea yield and yield components to cereal-legume intercropping under weed competitions. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research 8(1): 150-163. (In Persian with English Summary)

Streit, J., Meinen, C., Nelson, W.C.D., Siebrecht-Schöll, D.J., and Rauber, R., 2019. Above-and belowground biomass in a mixed cropping system with eight novel winter faba bean genotypes and winter wheat using FTIR spectroscopy for root species discrimination. Plant and Soil p. 1-18.

Tadayyon, M.R., and Ghorbaninejad, A.J., 2012. Effect of supplementary irrigation and compost application on morphological triats and yield of two chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research 3(2): 31-44. (In Persian with Enlish Summary)

Tuna, C., and Orak, A., 2007. The role of intercropping on yield potential of common vetch/oat cultivated in pure stand and mixtures. Journal of Agriculture Biological Science 2: 14-19.

Takeda, K., and Frey, J., 1976. Contributions of vegetative growth rate and harvest index in grain yield of progenies from Avena Sativa XA. Crop Science 16: 817-822.

Xiao, J., Yin, X., Ren, J., Zhang, M., Tang, L., and Zheng, Y., 2018. Complementation drives higher growth rate and yield of wheat and saves nitrogen fertilizer in wheat and faba bean intercropping. Field Crops Research 221: 119-129.

Yang, F., Huang, S., Gao, R., Liu, W., Yong, T., Wang, X., Wu, X., and Yang, W., 2014. Growth of soybean seedling in relay strip intercropping systems in relation to light quantity and red: far- red ratio. Field Crops Research 155: 245-253.

Yilmaz, Ş., Özel, A., Atak, M., and Erayman, M., 2015. Effects of seeding rates on competition indices of barley and vetch intercropping systems in the Eastern Mediterranean. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 39(1): 135-143.