p. 1−19
2423-4281
Vol.7/No.1
p. 20−37
2423-4281
Vol.7/No.1
0 and the competitive ratio of soybean (1.07, 1.2) was>1 that show that yield advantage was greater than mono-cropping system. The relative crowding coefficient (RCC) of calendula (0.46, 0.46, 0.76) was greater than that of soybean that proves the competitive advantage of calendula against soybean. In strip intercropping, 6:4 and 4:2 aggressivity of soybean (0.98, 1.43) was>0, that indicates the relative yield of soybean is greater than calendula. The negative aggressivity of calendula (0.93, 1.19) in this treatment shows that the relative yield of calendula is less than soybean. In row intercropping and strip intercropping 4:4 and 2:2 competitive ratio of calendula (1.13, 1.25, 2.06) was>0 and competitive ratio of soybean (1.07, 1.2) was >1 that shows that yield advantage was greater than mono-cropping system.]]>
p. 38−51
2423-4281
Vol.7/No.1
p. 52−61
2423-4281
Vol.7/No.1
p. 62−73
2423-4281
Vol.7/No.1
p. 74−83
2423-4281
Vol.7/No.1
p. 84−98
2423-4281
Vol.7/No.1
p. 99−108
2423-4281
Vol.7/No.1
p. 109−119
2423-4281
Vol.7/No.1
p. 120−126
2423-4281
Vol.7/No.1